Failure To Collect Electronic Evidence Such As Call Detail Records In Offences Under Section 354 IPC Can Prove Fatal To Prosecution Case: Telangana High Court Mere Pendency Of Challenge To Sale Certificate Before DRT Does Not Bar Mutation Under OSS Rules: Orissa High Court Court May Impose Conditions On Minor’s Custody In Habeas Corpus Proceedings To Protect Best Interest Of Child: Madhya Pradesh High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Cannot Be Rejected For Lack Of Specific Particulars Or Res Judicata At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Surprise Check Without Prior FIR Registration Casts Doubt On Foundational Facts; Uncorroborated Approver Evidence Tainted: Madras High Court Acquits Former Protector Of Emigrants Appointment Of Lambardar | Appellate Authority Remanding Matter Must Not Pre-Judge Merits Of Candidates: Punjab & Haryana High Court Disciplinary Proceedings | Subsequent Deposit Of Embezzled Amount Does Not Exonerate Employee Or Efface Misconduct: Rajasthan High Court Order XXI Rule 37 CPC | Willful Evasion Of Decretal Debt Despite Having Means Justifies Arrest And Detention: Telangana High Court Claims For Recovery Of Stridhan Must Be Substantiated By Cogent Evidence, Not Merely Oral Assertion: Kerala High Court Concurrent Findings Of Fact Regarding Unproved Oral Family Settlement Cannot Be Re-Appreciated In Second Appeal: Punjab And Haryana High Court Limitation Act | Governmental Bureaucratic Delays Without Acceptable Explanation Cannot Be A Ground For Condoning Delay Under Section 5: Telangana High Court Constitutional Courts Should Refrain From Fixing Time-Bound Schedules For Disposal Of Cases In Lower Courts: Jharkhand High Court Industrial Tribunal Cannot Bypass Adjudication Of Domestic Enquiry Validity In Termination Disputes: Calcutta High Court Section 106 Indian Evidence Act Cannot Shift Burden To Accused Unless Prosecution Establishes A Prima Facie Case: Allahabad High Court NDPS Act | Criminal Antecedents And Stage Of Investigation Are Decisive Factors For Grant Of Bail Under Section 480 BNSS: Andhra Pradesh High Court Cannot Dismember An Existing Factory: Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Notices To Acquire Private Land Under Section 299 MMC Act Order 21 Rule 32 CPC | Proof Of Violation By Way Of Expert Evidence Regarding Age Of Construction Is Mandatory: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 34 Arbitration And Conciliation Act | Court Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence, But Award Lacking Reasoning And Basis Is Patently Illegal: Calcutta High Court Section 175(3) & (4) BNSS | Magistrate Cannot Pass Mechanical Orders For FIR Registration Against Public Servants Without Complying With Statutory Safeguards: Allahabad High Court Section 69 Indian Succession Act | Provision For Automatic Revocation Of Will Upon Marriage Is Not Violative Of Article 14 Or 15 Of The Constitution: Kerala High Court Unilateral Cancellation Of Registered Gift Deed Without Civil Court Decree Is Void Ab-Initio: Andhra Pradesh High Court Inter-District Transfer Of Teachers Cannot Be Claimed As A Matter Of Right By Jeopardizing Student-Teacher Ratio: Supreme Court Judicial Misconduct | Threatening To Sleep On Pavement To Demand Official Accommodation Constitutes Grave Misconduct Disentitling A Judge From Service: Gujarat High Court Guardians And Wards Act | Father’s Declaration Of Having ‘No Children’ In Matrimonial Profile Disentitles Him To Custody: Madras High Court NDPS Act | Failure To Comply With Section 52A And Unexplained Delay In Forensic Sampling Vitiates Prosecution Case: Patna High Court

Telangana High Court Declares Detention Illegal: Violation of Procedure in Habeas Corpus Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Telangana High Court declared the detention of a petitioner's husband as illegal, citing a blatant violation of procedural requirements and guidelines. The case involved allegations of an arrest made without adhering to the due procedure laid down under the law, raising concerns over compliance with essential legal safeguards.

The bench, comprising Justices K. Lakshman and K. Sujana, delivered the verdict on September 27, 2023. The case centered on a writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Smt. Dubashi Swapana against the State of Telangana.

The court observed that the arrest of the petitioner's husband was conducted without adhering to the procedure prescribed by law and failed to comply with the guidelines set by the Supreme Court in the D.K. Basu case. The judgment stated, "The arrest of the husband of the petitioner is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It is an illegal detention."

Additionally, the court raised concerns about the notice issued under Section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), noting that the respondents provided no satisfactory explanation regarding its issuance and service. The judgment remarked, "There is no mention about the date, time, and place of service of the said notice on the detenu. The contention of the respondents that they followed the entire procedure laid down under law while arresting the husband of the petitioner is untenable."

As a result of the ruling, the Superintendent of District Jail, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh, was added as respondent No. 7 in the case. Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 were directed to release Dubashi Devender, the husband of the petitioner, immediately.

However, the court granted respondents the liberty to strictly follow the procedure laid down under the law while conducting investigations in NIA Case No. RC-01/2021/NIA/RPR, dated 18.03.2021.

This judgment underscores the importance of adhering to legal procedures and safeguarding the rights of detainees, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Date of Decision: 27 September, 2023

Smt. Dubashi Swapana   vs The State of Telangana etc.   

 

Latest Legal News