'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Telangana High Court Declares Detention Illegal: Violation of Procedure in Habeas Corpus Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Telangana High Court declared the detention of a petitioner's husband as illegal, citing a blatant violation of procedural requirements and guidelines. The case involved allegations of an arrest made without adhering to the due procedure laid down under the law, raising concerns over compliance with essential legal safeguards.

The bench, comprising Justices K. Lakshman and K. Sujana, delivered the verdict on September 27, 2023. The case centered on a writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Smt. Dubashi Swapana against the State of Telangana.

The court observed that the arrest of the petitioner's husband was conducted without adhering to the procedure prescribed by law and failed to comply with the guidelines set by the Supreme Court in the D.K. Basu case. The judgment stated, "The arrest of the husband of the petitioner is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It is an illegal detention."

Additionally, the court raised concerns about the notice issued under Section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), noting that the respondents provided no satisfactory explanation regarding its issuance and service. The judgment remarked, "There is no mention about the date, time, and place of service of the said notice on the detenu. The contention of the respondents that they followed the entire procedure laid down under law while arresting the husband of the petitioner is untenable."

As a result of the ruling, the Superintendent of District Jail, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh, was added as respondent No. 7 in the case. Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 were directed to release Dubashi Devender, the husband of the petitioner, immediately.

However, the court granted respondents the liberty to strictly follow the procedure laid down under the law while conducting investigations in NIA Case No. RC-01/2021/NIA/RPR, dated 18.03.2021.

This judgment underscores the importance of adhering to legal procedures and safeguarding the rights of detainees, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

Date of Decision: 27 September, 2023

Smt. Dubashi Swapana   vs The State of Telangana etc.   

 

Latest Legal News