Motor Insurance Policy Covers Cross-Border Travel If Specifically Authorized By Valid Permit Under MVA: Supreme Court Petrol Pumps Act As 'Commission Agents' For Mahanagar Gas, Liable To Pay Service Tax Under Business Auxiliary Service: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Dilute 'Bangalore Water Supply' Ratio, Affirms Worker Protection Remains The Core Of Industrial Disputes Act Order XXII Rule 9(3) CPC | Application Under Section 5 Limitation Act Must Be Filed Separately To Condonate Delay In Setting Aside Abatement: Supreme Court Principle Of Parity | Supreme Court Extends Benefit Of Fixed-Term Sentence To Co-Accused Based On Remission Period Right To Catch Fish Amounts To 'Profit à Prendre' And Is Compulsorily Registrable As A Lease Under Section 17(1)(d) Registration Act: Supreme Court Supreme Court Mandates Adoption Of Guidelines To Inculcate Sensitivity And Compassion In Judicial Processes For Sexual Offences 'Last Seen' Circumstance Is Weak Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused PSEB | Pre-Regularization Service Must Be Counted As Qualifying Service For Pensionary Benefits: Supreme Court Writ Of Quo Warranto Cannot Be Used For Redress Of Personal Grievances By Unsuccessful Candidates In Selection Process: Supreme Court 'Case Of No Investigation': Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Citing 'Shoddy' Police Work And Lack Of Forensic Evidence 'Status Quo Cannot Be Vacated Without Appropriate Security': Supreme Court Directs Additional ₹200 Crores Deposit In RAKIA-Matrix Case SARFAESI Act | 'Bank' As Assignee Can Invoke Recovery Measures Even If Debt Was Originally Created By Non-Notified Financial Institution: Supreme Court 'CBI Failed Miserably': Supreme Court Tears Into 'Fabricated' Case, Acquits Bank Manager In 35-Year-Old Corruption Trial Mere Delay In Tax Deposit Cannot Be Equated With Non-Payment: Supreme Court Quashes Penalty On Saudi Arabian Airlines Revisional Power Under Section 56 Karnataka Land Revenue Act Cannot Be Invoked Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period: Supreme Court Prosecution Can’t Use Known Locations To Create 'Discovery' Fiction: Supreme Court Rejects Site Plan As Evidence Irretrievable Breakdown Of Marriage And Long-Term Separation Constitute Valid Grounds For Divorce Under Section 13(1)(ib) HMA: Supreme Court 'Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Is A Guideline And Not A Fetish': Supreme Court Acquits Man In 2007 Murder Case Over Fragile Circumstantial Evidence Plea Of Juvenility Is A Jurisdictional Fact; High Court Must Recall Final Judgments Under Section 482 CrPC To Remedy Miscarriage Of Justice: Supreme Court SEBI | Professional Clearing Members Have No Statutory Obligation To Verify Credit/Debit Positions Of Individual Clients Of Trading Members: Supreme Court

Suspicion, May Be Of Higher Degree, Cannot Take Place Of Proof” – High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal In Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Himachal Pradesh High Court on Friday dismissed a criminal appeal by the State against the acquittal of Prem Raj alias I.D., who had been previously cleared of murder charges by the Sessions Court. The Bench comprising Justice Vivek Singh Thakur and Justice Virender Singh held that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal stemmed from a 2011 acquittal in a murder case where the respondent was accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Prem Raj had pushed the deceased, Sanjay, from a cliff after a physical altercation, resulting in Sanjay’s death.

The case hinged on the reliability of witness testimonies and the coherence of the prosecution narrative. Key issues included the credibility of eyewitnesses, the forensic evidence presented, and procedural adherence during the investigation.

The court noted significant discrepancies in witness accounts and found their testimonies lacked consistency. For instance, witnesses provided conflicting statements regarding the events leading up to the alleged crime.

The forensic analysis did not conclusively link the respondent to the crime scene with definitive evidence. Moreover, the prosecution was unable to present a coherent sequence of events that aligned with the physical evidence collected.

The court criticized the handling of the investigation, highlighting procedural lapses that compromised the integrity of the evidence.

Emphasizing a foundational principle of criminal law, the bench stated, “It is apparent from the above discussion that suspicion, may be of higher degree, cannot take place of proof of commission of offence.” The court maintained that the benefit of doubt must be extended to the accused in the absence of conclusive evidence.

Decision: The High Court concluded that the state failed to meet the threshold of proof required for a conviction in a criminal case. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the Sessions Court’s decision to acquit Prem Raj.

Date of Decision :  April 20, 2024

State of H.P. vs. Prem Raj @ I.D.

Latest Legal News