MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Suspicion, May Be Of Higher Degree, Cannot Take Place Of Proof” – High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal In Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Himachal Pradesh High Court on Friday dismissed a criminal appeal by the State against the acquittal of Prem Raj alias I.D., who had been previously cleared of murder charges by the Sessions Court. The Bench comprising Justice Vivek Singh Thakur and Justice Virender Singh held that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal stemmed from a 2011 acquittal in a murder case where the respondent was accused under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that Prem Raj had pushed the deceased, Sanjay, from a cliff after a physical altercation, resulting in Sanjay’s death.

The case hinged on the reliability of witness testimonies and the coherence of the prosecution narrative. Key issues included the credibility of eyewitnesses, the forensic evidence presented, and procedural adherence during the investigation.

The court noted significant discrepancies in witness accounts and found their testimonies lacked consistency. For instance, witnesses provided conflicting statements regarding the events leading up to the alleged crime.

The forensic analysis did not conclusively link the respondent to the crime scene with definitive evidence. Moreover, the prosecution was unable to present a coherent sequence of events that aligned with the physical evidence collected.

The court criticized the handling of the investigation, highlighting procedural lapses that compromised the integrity of the evidence.

Emphasizing a foundational principle of criminal law, the bench stated, “It is apparent from the above discussion that suspicion, may be of higher degree, cannot take place of proof of commission of offence.” The court maintained that the benefit of doubt must be extended to the accused in the absence of conclusive evidence.

Decision: The High Court concluded that the state failed to meet the threshold of proof required for a conviction in a criminal case. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the Sessions Court’s decision to acquit Prem Raj.

Date of Decision :  April 20, 2024

State of H.P. vs. Prem Raj @ I.D.

Latest Legal News