Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy

Suspension Cannot be Indefinite: Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes IPS Officer's Suspension Orders  for Procedural Violations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the limits of administrative powers in suspending All India Services officers, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed the suspension orders of IPS officer Param Raj Singh Umaranangal. The bench comprising Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Justice Sudeepti Sharma held that the suspension, extending over a period of almost five years, was invalid due to non-compliance with the mandatory procedural requirements under the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969.

The petitioner, Param Raj Singh Umaranangal, challenged the suspension orders dated February 26, 2019, November 20, 2020, and March 22, 2021, on grounds of procedural irregularities. The officer had been under suspension since February 18, 2019, due to various criminal charges against him.

The court noted, "Suspension, especially preceding the formulation of charges, is essentially transitory or temporary in nature, and must perforce be of short duration." This observation was crucial in determining the fate of the suspension orders. The bench observed that the suspension orders were not valid beyond the specified period without proper review and extension by the competent authority, as required under Rule 3 of the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969.

Highlighting the importance of procedural compliance, the court remarked, "The State Government cannot pick and choose the Rules of their suitability and pass the orders without following the procedure as mentioned in the Rules."

In its judgment, the bench relied on several precedents, including the landmark judgment of Ajay Kumar Chaudhary Vs. Union of India, which emphasized the need for suspension to be for a short duration.

The court's decision to quash the suspension orders and direct the immediate reinstatement of the petitioner is seen as a reaffirmation of the principles of fairness and due process in administrative actions. This judgment sets a precedent, emphasizing the need for adherence to the prescribed procedures in the suspension of All India Services officers.

Date of Decision: 02 Feb. 2024

Param Raj Singh Umaranangal VS Union of India and Others     

 

Similar News