Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Surplus Funds Not Used in Furtherance of the Object of the Club" – Supreme Court Rules Interest Earned by Clubs on Bank Deposits Taxable

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that the interest earned on bank deposits made by various clubs, including Secunderabad Club, Madras Gymkhana Club, and others, is liable to be taxed. The Court rejected the application of the principle of mutuality, holding that the surplus funds were not used in furtherance of the object of the club.

The appeals arose from the High Courts of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad and the Madras High Court, where the central question of law was whether the deposit of surplus funds by the appellant Clubs in various banks is liable to be taxed. The clubs contended that the principle of mutuality should apply, and the interest earned from the deposits should not be subject to tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

In its observation, the Supreme Court noted that "there must be a complete identity between the class of participators and class of contributors, and the actions of the participators and contributors must be in furtherance of the mandate of the association" [Para 10]. The Court further analyzed the arrangement between the banks and the Club and the use of surplus funds in fixed deposits with banks.

The judgment concluded that the first condition for a claim of mutuality is not satisfied in the present case. The Court stated, "the surplus funds were not used in furtherance of the object of the club, thus not satisfying the second condition" [Paras 29-30].

The decision has significant implications for clubs and similar associations across the country, as it clarifies the tax liability on interest earned from surplus funds deposited in banks. The judgment reaffirms the principles laid down in previous cases, including Bangalore Club vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, and sets a precedent for future cases involving the principle of mutuality.

The Supreme Court's ruling has settled the legal debate on this issue, providing clear guidance to clubs and tax authorities alike. The judgment emphasizes the importance of the purpose and use of surplus funds in determining tax liability, shedding light on the nuanced application of the principle of mutuality in the context of clubs.

 

Date of Decision: August 17, 2023

SECUNDRABAD CLUB ETC.  vs C.I.T.-V ETC.        

Similar News