Mere Entry, Abuse Or Assault Is Not Civil Contempt – Willfulness And Dispossession Must Be Clearly Proved: Bombay High Court Magistrate Cannot Shut Eyes To Final Report After Cognizance – Supplementary Report Must Be Judicially Considered Before Framing Charges: Allahabad High Court Examination-in-Chief Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Amid Serious Doubts: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Cannot Reclaim Absolute Ownership After Letting Your Declaration Suit Fail: AP High Court Enforces Finality in Partition Appeal Death Due to Fat Embolism and Delayed Treatment Is Not Culpable Homicide: Orissa High Court Converts 30-Year-Old 304 Part-I Conviction to Grievous Hurt Fabricated Lease Cannot Be Sanctified by Consolidation Entry: Orissa High Court Dismisses 36-Year-Old Second Appeal Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization

Surplus Funds Not Used in Furtherance of the Object of the Club" – Supreme Court Rules Interest Earned by Clubs on Bank Deposits Taxable

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that the interest earned on bank deposits made by various clubs, including Secunderabad Club, Madras Gymkhana Club, and others, is liable to be taxed. The Court rejected the application of the principle of mutuality, holding that the surplus funds were not used in furtherance of the object of the club.

The appeals arose from the High Courts of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad and the Madras High Court, where the central question of law was whether the deposit of surplus funds by the appellant Clubs in various banks is liable to be taxed. The clubs contended that the principle of mutuality should apply, and the interest earned from the deposits should not be subject to tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

In its observation, the Supreme Court noted that "there must be a complete identity between the class of participators and class of contributors, and the actions of the participators and contributors must be in furtherance of the mandate of the association" [Para 10]. The Court further analyzed the arrangement between the banks and the Club and the use of surplus funds in fixed deposits with banks.

The judgment concluded that the first condition for a claim of mutuality is not satisfied in the present case. The Court stated, "the surplus funds were not used in furtherance of the object of the club, thus not satisfying the second condition" [Paras 29-30].

The decision has significant implications for clubs and similar associations across the country, as it clarifies the tax liability on interest earned from surplus funds deposited in banks. The judgment reaffirms the principles laid down in previous cases, including Bangalore Club vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, and sets a precedent for future cases involving the principle of mutuality.

The Supreme Court's ruling has settled the legal debate on this issue, providing clear guidance to clubs and tax authorities alike. The judgment emphasizes the importance of the purpose and use of surplus funds in determining tax liability, shedding light on the nuanced application of the principle of mutuality in the context of clubs.

 

Date of Decision: August 17, 2023

SECUNDRABAD CLUB ETC.  vs C.I.T.-V ETC.        

Latest Legal News