Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

Surplus Funds Not Used in Furtherance of the Object of the Club" – Supreme Court Rules Interest Earned by Clubs on Bank Deposits Taxable

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that the interest earned on bank deposits made by various clubs, including Secunderabad Club, Madras Gymkhana Club, and others, is liable to be taxed. The Court rejected the application of the principle of mutuality, holding that the surplus funds were not used in furtherance of the object of the club.

The appeals arose from the High Courts of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad and the Madras High Court, where the central question of law was whether the deposit of surplus funds by the appellant Clubs in various banks is liable to be taxed. The clubs contended that the principle of mutuality should apply, and the interest earned from the deposits should not be subject to tax under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

In its observation, the Supreme Court noted that "there must be a complete identity between the class of participators and class of contributors, and the actions of the participators and contributors must be in furtherance of the mandate of the association" [Para 10]. The Court further analyzed the arrangement between the banks and the Club and the use of surplus funds in fixed deposits with banks.

The judgment concluded that the first condition for a claim of mutuality is not satisfied in the present case. The Court stated, "the surplus funds were not used in furtherance of the object of the club, thus not satisfying the second condition" [Paras 29-30].

The decision has significant implications for clubs and similar associations across the country, as it clarifies the tax liability on interest earned from surplus funds deposited in banks. The judgment reaffirms the principles laid down in previous cases, including Bangalore Club vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, and sets a precedent for future cases involving the principle of mutuality.

The Supreme Court's ruling has settled the legal debate on this issue, providing clear guidance to clubs and tax authorities alike. The judgment emphasizes the importance of the purpose and use of surplus funds in determining tax liability, shedding light on the nuanced application of the principle of mutuality in the context of clubs.

 

Date of Decision: August 17, 2023

SECUNDRABAD CLUB ETC.  vs C.I.T.-V ETC.        

Similar News