Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Rajasthan’s Mineral Concession Rules Amendments – Auction Process Deemed Constitutional

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the validity of the amendments made to the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986, introducing the auction process and rejecting pending applications for quarry licenses and mining leases. The judgment was delivered by a Bench of esteemed Justices on 1 August 2023.

 The apex court, in its verdict, stated,There is no fundamental right of the applicants to carry on mining operations. They have no vested right to seek a lease or a license.” The Court emphasized that the applicants’ expectations were not legitimate rights and held that the amendments were well within the scope of the law.

 The legal challenge to the amendments was brought before the Supreme Court by aggrieved parties seeking to overturn the declaration of certain Rules as unconstitutional. However, the Court held that the power conferred by Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, allowed the State Government to introduce the auction process and reject pending applications.

 The introduction of the auction process will bring transparency and efficiency in the allocation of mineral concessions,” the Court noted in its judgment. The decision is expected to streamline the allocation process and curb any potential malpractices.

 The Court further clarified that the applicants did not have a fundamental right in mining activities, and the State Government was entitled to introduce changes in the rules to promote better management of mineral resources.

 The ruling has significant implications for the mining industry in Rajasthan, as it validates the amendments aimed at improving resource allocation and promoting fair practices. The auction process is set to become the new norm for granting mineral concessions in the state.

 Industry experts have welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision, stating that it will foster a more competitive environment and attract investments in the mining sector. The judgment sets a precedent for other states to adopt similar measures in the interest of better governance and efficient utilization of mineral resources.

 With the apex court’s affirmation of the amendments’ constitutionality, Rajasthan’s mining sector is poised for a transformative shift, heralding a new era of transparency and accountability in the allocation of mineral concessions.

 D.D-1.Aug.2023

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. vs SHARWAN KUMAR KUMAWAT ETC.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/01-Aug-2023_State_Vs_Sharvan.pdf"]

Latest Legal News