MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Upholds Presumption of Valid Marriage in Landmark Ruling on Pension Benefits

06 September 2024 5:34 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking judgment delivered on August 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of India upheld the presumption of a valid marriage based on continuous cohabitation in a case concerning entitlement to pensionary benefits. Justices Hima Kohli and Rajesh Bindal presided over the bench that passed this landmark ruling.

The case involved Smt. Shiramabai and her children who sought to claim pensionary benefits following the demise of Subedar Pundalik Bhave. The deceased had been married multiple times, and the validity of his marriage with Smt. Shiramabai was challenged due to a prior marriage and subsequent divorce. The High Court had previously dismissed the appeal by the appellants, questioning the legitimacy of the marriage.

Justice Hima Kohli, in the judgment, emphasized the significance of long-term cohabitation as a factor for inferring a valid marriage. The court stated, "A strong presumption arises in favour of wedlock where the partners have lived together for a long spell as husband and wife," citing legal precedents. The bench acknowledged that while the presumption is rebuttable, the burden of proof falls heavily on the party challenging the relationship.

The court referred to Section 114 of the Evidence Act and a series of legal precedents to establish the principle that continuous cohabitation can imply a valid marriage. The judgment underscored the importance of considering societal recognition and the conduct of the parties involved when determining the legitimacy of a relationship.

Justice Rajesh Bindal also weighed in, stating, "The law leans in favour of legitimacy and frowns upon bastardy." The court highlighted the need to examine evidence and circumstances surrounding the relationship, and the obligation to evaluate the strength of the presumption.

The ruling further interpreted Regulation 219 of the Pension Regulation for the Army, 1961, and declared Smt. Shiramabai entitled to receive pensionary benefits as the deceased's widow. The judgment also granted benefits to the deceased's legitimate children until they reached the age of 25, in accordance with relevant regulations.

The Supreme Court's decision reverberates across legal circles, setting a significant precedent for cases involving long-term relationships and entitlement to benefits. Legal experts applaud the court's emphasis on recognizing the sanctity of relationships formed through continuous cohabitation and societal recognition. This landmark ruling is expected to influence future cases in the realm of family and pensionary law.

DATE OF DECISION: August 18, 2023

SMT. SHIRAMABAI W/O PUNDALIK. BHAVE & OTHERS  vs THE CAPTAIN, RECORD OFFICER FOR O.I.C. RECORDS,  SENA CORPS ABHILEKH, GAYA, BIHAR STATE AND ANOTHER

Latest Legal News