Bail | Right to Speedy Trial is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21: PH High Court    |     Postal Department’s Power to Enhance Penalties Time-Barred, Rules Allahabad High Court    |     Tenants Cannot Cross-Examine Landlords Unless Relationship is Disputed: Madras High Court    |     NDPS | Conscious Possession Extends to Vehicle Drivers: Telangana High Court Upholds 10-Year Sentence in Ganja Trafficking Case    |     Aid Reduction Of Without Due Process Unlawful: Rajasthan High Court Restores Full Grants for Educational Institutions    |     Assessment of Notional Income in Absence of Proof Cannot Be 'Mathematically Precise,' Says Patna High Court    |     NCLT's Resolution Plan Overrides State Tax Claims: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Demands Against Patanjali Foods    |     An Agreement is Not Voidable if the Party Could Discover the Truth with Ordinary Diligence: Calcutta High Court Quashes Termination of LPG Distributorship License    |     Independent Witnesses Contradict Prosecution's Story: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquit Accused in Arson Case    |     Merely Being a Joint Account Holder Does Not Attract Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act:  Gujarat High Court    |     Higher Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perversity is Found: Himachal Pradesh High Court Refused to Enhance Maintenance    |     Perpetual Lease Allows Division of Property: Delhi High Court Affirms Partition and Validity of Purdah Wall    |     "Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Videography in Temple Premises Limited to Religious Functions: Kerala High Court Orders to Restrict Non-Religious Activities on Temple Premises    |     Past Service Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Affirms Pension Rights for Daily Wage Employees    |     'Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ Does Not Mean Beyond All Doubt: Madras High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Man Convicted of Murdering Mother-in-Law    |    

Supreme Court Upholds Presumption of Valid Marriage in Landmark Ruling on Pension Benefits

06 September 2024 5:34 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking judgment delivered on August 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of India upheld the presumption of a valid marriage based on continuous cohabitation in a case concerning entitlement to pensionary benefits. Justices Hima Kohli and Rajesh Bindal presided over the bench that passed this landmark ruling.

The case involved Smt. Shiramabai and her children who sought to claim pensionary benefits following the demise of Subedar Pundalik Bhave. The deceased had been married multiple times, and the validity of his marriage with Smt. Shiramabai was challenged due to a prior marriage and subsequent divorce. The High Court had previously dismissed the appeal by the appellants, questioning the legitimacy of the marriage.

Justice Hima Kohli, in the judgment, emphasized the significance of long-term cohabitation as a factor for inferring a valid marriage. The court stated, "A strong presumption arises in favour of wedlock where the partners have lived together for a long spell as husband and wife," citing legal precedents. The bench acknowledged that while the presumption is rebuttable, the burden of proof falls heavily on the party challenging the relationship.

The court referred to Section 114 of the Evidence Act and a series of legal precedents to establish the principle that continuous cohabitation can imply a valid marriage. The judgment underscored the importance of considering societal recognition and the conduct of the parties involved when determining the legitimacy of a relationship.

Justice Rajesh Bindal also weighed in, stating, "The law leans in favour of legitimacy and frowns upon bastardy." The court highlighted the need to examine evidence and circumstances surrounding the relationship, and the obligation to evaluate the strength of the presumption.

The ruling further interpreted Regulation 219 of the Pension Regulation for the Army, 1961, and declared Smt. Shiramabai entitled to receive pensionary benefits as the deceased's widow. The judgment also granted benefits to the deceased's legitimate children until they reached the age of 25, in accordance with relevant regulations.

The Supreme Court's decision reverberates across legal circles, setting a significant precedent for cases involving long-term relationships and entitlement to benefits. Legal experts applaud the court's emphasis on recognizing the sanctity of relationships formed through continuous cohabitation and societal recognition. This landmark ruling is expected to influence future cases in the realm of family and pensionary law.

DATE OF DECISION: August 18, 2023

SMT. SHIRAMABAI W/O PUNDALIK. BHAVE & OTHERS  vs THE CAPTAIN, RECORD OFFICER FOR O.I.C. RECORDS,  SENA CORPS ABHILEKH, GAYA, BIHAR STATE AND ANOTHER

Similar News