Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Verdict in Insurance Dispute, Directs Transfer of Amount to DRT for Recovery

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of India upheld the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in an insurance dispute case involving G.M., Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. versus Ashok Kumar Roy (D) thr. Lrs. The case revolved around the validity of an insurance policy and the coverage of a fire accident under the said policy.

The dispute arose when the appellants challenged the NCDRC's verdict that directed them to pay a substantial sum of Rs.50,05,899/- along with an interest rate of 9% per annum to the respondent. The NCDRC had found that the policy issued by the appellants covered the fire and peril that had occurred during the period from 31.03.2001 to 29.03.2002.

The appellants contended that the policy had been wrongly issued and that they had subsequently taken steps to cancel it. However, their claim lacked substantiating evidence, as they failed to produce the communication supporting the alleged cancellation. The Court observed, "The absence of evidence supporting the appellant's claim is highlighted." The Court further noted that the NCDRC's conclusion was justified in considering the validity of the policy.

Addressing a separate issue, the lending bank filed an application for impleadment and sought direction for the recovery of dues. The recovery certificate issued by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 was brought into the proceedings. The Court directed the transfer of the available deposit to DRT, Guwahati, for accounting in the recovery proceedings. Both the bank and the respondent were provided an opportunity to consider the due amount and submit their arguments before the recovery officer.

The Supreme Court's decision dismissed the appeal and ordered the transfer of the deposit amount to DRT, emphasizing that the recovery officer should consider the due amount and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law. The Court's decision upheld the NCDRC's judgment and reiterated the importance of producing substantial evidence in support of claims.

Date of Decision: 09th August, 2023 

G.M.,ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD . & ORS. vs ASHOK KUMAR ROY (D) THR.LRS.   

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/G_M_Oriental_Insurance_Co_Ltd_vs_Ashok_Kumar_Roy_D_Thr_Lrs_on_9_August_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News