MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement and Development Deductions

04 September 2024 11:07 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India, in a bench comprising Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Justice Dipankar Datta, dismissed a batch of 12 appeals challenging the enhancement of compensation in land acquisition cases. The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.

The High Court had enhanced the market value of the acquired land and granted statutory benefits to the landowners, which were contested by the appellants. The focus of the appellants' arguments was primarily on the valuation of the land, applicability of development charges, and consideration of sale instances.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, laid down important principles concerning the determination of market value in land acquisition cases. It emphasized that the market value should be assessed based on various factors, including the land's existing condition, location, user, proximity to different areas, size, and nature. The Court also discussed the significance of suitable deductions for development charges, taking into account the nature of the land, its development status, and the purpose of acquisition.

Justice Trivedi stated, "The guiding principles for determining the market value of the land at the date of the publication of the notification under Section 4(1) are well settled... No doubt, for ascertaining the market value of the land, its existing condition, location and user, its proximity to residential, commercial or industrial area etc. are the major factors required to be considered."

Justice Datta further added, "The assessment of market value and deductions should consider the size, shape, situation, and user of the land acquired. It involves a kind of guesswork that the courts are expected to undertake."

The Supreme Court also addressed the exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. It reiterated that this jurisdiction should be exercised only in exceptional circumstances and with utmost care and caution.

Supreme Court upheld the High Court's assessment of market value and deductions, emphasizing the importance of considering relevant factors and making suitable deductions for development charges. The appeals challenging the enhancement of compensation and deductions were dismissed.

Date of Decision: August 17, 2023

MALA ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Latest Legal News