Rigours of UAPA Melt Before Article 21: Jharkhand High Court Grants Bail After Six Years of Incarceration Accused Cannot Challenge in Arguments What He Never Challenged in Cross-Examination: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction Counterblast Plea, Civil Dispute Defence No Shield When Cognizable Offence Is Disclosed: Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Ex-Driver Accused Of Outraging Modesty Lawyers Who Burned a Colleague's Furniture for Defending Toll Workers Have Tainted a Noble Profession: Supreme Court A Suspicious Dying Declaration Cannot Hang a Man: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Murder Conviction IQ of 65, Memory Loss, Frontal Lobe Damage: Supreme Court Holds Brain-Injured Manager Suffered 100% Functional Disability, Enhances Compensation to ₹97.73 Lakh Cannot Be Forced to Pay Gratuity to Retired Employees Who Refuse to Vacate Company Quarters: Supreme Court Victim Who Incited Riot Inside Court Cannot Blame Accused for Trial Delay: Supreme Court Grants Bail in Section 307 Case You Cannot Sell What You Don’t Own: ‘Vendor’s Half Share Means Buyer Gets Only Half’ : Andhra Pradesh High Court Nagaland's Oil Laws Face Constitutional Challenge: Gauhati High Court Sends Union-State Dispute to Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 3 CPC | Will's Validity Cannot Be Decided in Substitution Proceedings: Himachal Pradesh High Court 6-Year-Old Loses Arm To Live 11kV Wire Passing 'Almost Touching' Her Balcony: Punjab & Haryana High Court Awards Rs. 99.93 Lakh To Child Despite Nigam Blaming Father For 'Extending Balcony' Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 To Quash Rape & POCSO Conviction After Marriage Between Accused And Victim NGT Cannot Order Demolition of Temple On Ground of Encroachment of Park: Supreme Court Quashes Removal Order For Want of Jurisdiction Hostile Witnesses & Doubtful Recovery Can Collapse Prosecution: J&K High Court Sets High Threshold for Criminal Proof Compassion Cannot Override the Clock: Karnataka HC Denies Job to Guardian Aunt Despite 2021 Rule Change” Second Marriage During Pendency of Divorce Appeal Is Void: Kerala High Court Appearing in Exam Does Not Cure Attendance Deficiency: MP High Court Upholds 'Year Down' Against BBA Student With Sub-30% Attendance Patna High Court Directs Bihar To Submit Detailed Rehabilitation Plan For Recovered Mental Health Patients, Expand Half-Way Homes Across State Rajasthan High Court Upholds Refusal to Drop Bharat Band Stone-Pelting Case

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement and Development Deductions

04 September 2024 11:07 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India, in a bench comprising Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Justice Dipankar Datta, dismissed a batch of 12 appeals challenging the enhancement of compensation in land acquisition cases. The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.

The High Court had enhanced the market value of the acquired land and granted statutory benefits to the landowners, which were contested by the appellants. The focus of the appellants' arguments was primarily on the valuation of the land, applicability of development charges, and consideration of sale instances.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, laid down important principles concerning the determination of market value in land acquisition cases. It emphasized that the market value should be assessed based on various factors, including the land's existing condition, location, user, proximity to different areas, size, and nature. The Court also discussed the significance of suitable deductions for development charges, taking into account the nature of the land, its development status, and the purpose of acquisition.

Justice Trivedi stated, "The guiding principles for determining the market value of the land at the date of the publication of the notification under Section 4(1) are well settled... No doubt, for ascertaining the market value of the land, its existing condition, location and user, its proximity to residential, commercial or industrial area etc. are the major factors required to be considered."

Justice Datta further added, "The assessment of market value and deductions should consider the size, shape, situation, and user of the land acquired. It involves a kind of guesswork that the courts are expected to undertake."

The Supreme Court also addressed the exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. It reiterated that this jurisdiction should be exercised only in exceptional circumstances and with utmost care and caution.

Supreme Court upheld the High Court's assessment of market value and deductions, emphasizing the importance of considering relevant factors and making suitable deductions for development charges. The appeals challenging the enhancement of compensation and deductions were dismissed.

Date of Decision: August 17, 2023

MALA ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Latest Legal News