Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

"Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Ruling: Unconstitutional Land Dispossession and Resumption Proceedings Deemed Illegal"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the ruling of the High Court of Orissa, underscoring the significance of lawful land allocation processes and constitutional adherence. The case, originating from a writ petition filed by Surgeon Vice Admiral GP Panda, revolved around the allocation of land to armed personnel and subsequent attempts to dispossess them through resumption proceedings.

The bench consisting of Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti emphasized the importance of a proper legal process in land allocation and re-entry. The Supreme Court observed, "The State's attempt to dispossess or allocate land without due process is unconstitutional and illegal."

The dispute arose from the allocation of land measuring acres 4.800 decimals to Surgeon Vice Admiral GP Panda, a participant in the Indo-China war. Despite the initiation of resumption proceedings by the State, the High Court found that the actions contradicted the State's own claims and were arbitrary. The High Court's decision was based on a thorough examination of documents and records, without exceeding the scope of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

"The High Court's findings were derived from existing records, not deciding disputed questions of fact," the Supreme Court noted, affirming the appropriateness of the High Court's approach.

This ruling highlights the significance of ensuring proper legal procedures in matters of land allocation and re-entry, safeguarding individuals' rights and preventing arbitrary dispossession. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by the State and the Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation of Orissa (IDCO), reinforcing the validity of the High Court's decision.

The case underscores the principle that adherence to the law is imperative even in matters involving government allocations, as the Supreme Court continues to play a pivotal role in upholding justice and safeguarding constitutional rights.

Date of Decision: August 22, 2023

Chairman-cum-managing director Vs Late surgeon vice admiral gp panda

Similar News