Supreme Court  Upholds High Courts’ Authority Over Tribunals, Balances Development and Environment

In a Landmark Ruling, Apex Court Overrules NGT Decisions, Reaffirms High Courts’ Judicial Supervision, and Stresses Sustainable Development.

In a landmark judgment today, the Supreme Court of India, presided over by Justices B.R. Gavai and Aravind Kumar, has overturned several orders of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) pertaining to environmental clearance for a development plan in the State of Himachal Pradesh. This significant ruling reiterates the importance of judicial propriety and the necessity of balancing developmental needs with environmental conservation.

The bench declared, “In view of the settled legal position, we are of the view that the continuation of the proceedings by the NGT during the pendency of the writ petitions before the High Court was not in conformity with the principles of judicial propriety.” This observation underscores the supervisory role of High Courts over Tribunals and the importance of respecting the jurisdiction of courts.

This decision comes against the backdrop of the NGT’s orders that were challenged for being passed despite related matters being pending in the High Court of Himachal Pradesh. The apex court criticized this move as an overreach of NGT’s jurisdiction and a breach of judicial decorum.

Further, the Court highlighted the need for sustainable development, stating, “While ensuring the developmental activities so as to meet the demands of growing population, it is also necessary that the issues with regard to environmental and ecological protection are addressed too.” This reflects a growing judicial recognition of the delicate balance between human development and environmental preservation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh, thereby permitting the implementation of the development plan, subject to the condition that it adheres to the principles of sustainable development and environmental protection.

The judgment also opens a window for specific challenges to the development plan if any of its provisions are found detrimental to environmental or ecological concerns. This aspect provides a safeguard against potential environmental degradation that might arise from unregulated development.

This ruling is a significant step in defining the boundaries of jurisdiction among different judicial and quasi-judicial bodies in India, particularly in matters involving environmental concerns and developmental policies. It also sets a precedent for future cases where the intricate balance between development and environmental conservation is at stake.

The full implications of this judgment on environmental law and policy-making are yet to be seen, but it is expected to influence a wide range of future environmental and developmental decisions across India.

Date of Decision: January 11, 2024

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS VS YOGENDERA MOHAN SENGUPTA AND ANOTHER .