Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Upholds Counting of Service Rendered by Transferred Teachers for Seniority in Pune Municipal Corporation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India upheld the inclusion of service rendered by primary teachers in the Zilla Parishad (ZP) for determining their seniority after their transfer to the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC). The judgment, delivered by Justice Surya Kant and Justice J.K. Maheshwari, emphasized the importance of interpreting the relevant statutory provisions and established that the service rendered by the transferred teachers in the ZP should be considered as service rendered in the PMC itself.

The Court stated, "Service rendered by such officers and servants before the appointed day shall be deemed to be service rendered in the service of the Corporation," highlighting the protection provided under Clause 5(c) of Appendix IV of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. Consequently, the seniority of the primary teachers is to be counted from the initial date of their appointment in the ZP.

The ruling dismissed the argument that Section 3(3)(b) of the MMC Act, which deals with the protection of conditions of service, was applicable to the determination of seniority. The Court clarified that Section 3(3)(b) does not regulate the conditions of service of transferred employees and should not be invoked in this context. Instead, the Court relied on Clause 5(c) of Appendix IV, which explicitly safeguards the rights of officers and servants transferred to the Corporation, deeming their prior service as service rendered in the PMC.

Furthermore, the Court rejected the plea of estoppel and acquiescence, stating that the transferred teachers were not obliged to challenge the recommendations of the PMC Committee. The Court emphasized that the cause of action arose upon the issuance of the final seniority list, which prompted the timely approach to the High Court. As a result, the objection of estoppel and acquiescence raised by the appellant was untenable.

Date of Decision: March 17, 2023

Maharashtra Rajya Padvidhar Prathamik Shikshak Va Kendra Pramukh Sabha   vs Pune Municipal Corporation and Ors. 

 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/17-Mar-2023-Maharastra-vs-PMC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News