Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     Sudden Fight Without Premeditation Led to Fatal Injury, Not Murder: Supreme Court Reduces Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide    |     Andhra Pradesh High Court Holds Indefinite Suspension of Bar License Without Reason Violates Natural Justice Principles    |     Statements Recorded Under Section 108 of the Customs Act Do Not Warrant Pre-Arrest Bail: Kerala High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Petitioners in Gold Smuggling Case    |     Muslim Law | Delay in Declaring Matrimonial Status Does Not Apply to Divorce Cases: Allahabad HC    |     Absence of Doctor's Certification on Victim's Mental Fitness Makes Dying Declaration Unreliable: Allahabad High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Death Case    |     Dying Declaration Can Sustain Conviction Even Without Doctor's Certificate of Fitness: Punjab & Haryana HC Upholds Conviction in Dowry Death Case    |     Mere Allegations of Harassment Do Not Constitute Cruelty Without Sufficient Evidence: Bombay High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Abetment of Suicide and Cruelty    |     Right to Hearing: Petitioners Must Be Heard Before Finalizing FTL of Durgam Cheruvu: Telangana High Court Directs No Demolition Until Decision    |     No Fresh Consent Needed Under Section 50 of NDPS Act Once Accused Elects Search Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate: Punjab and Haryana High Court    |     Suspicious Circumstances Around the 1993 Will: Wife Declared Dead While Alive: Calcutta HC Voids Probate    |     Extension of Sale Deed Deadline Prima Facie Binding, Time Not Essence of the Contract: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit    |     Law Does Not Compel the Impossible : High Court Invokes Doctrine of Impossibility in Pension Eligibility Case    |     Bar Council of India Mandates Criminal Background Checks, Biometric Attendance, and Strict Employment Declarations for Law Students    |     Service Law | Grant of Prosecution Sanction is Not Enough for Sealed Cover: SC Upholds DPC Findings in Favor of IRS Officer    |     Stamp Act | Agreements to Sell with Possession Clauses Are Conveyances and Must Be Stamped Separately: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Directs Immediate Implementation of Electronic Road Safety Monitoring Under Motor Vehicles Act    |     Supreme Court Stays Defamation Proceedings Against Shashi Tharoor, Issues Notice on "Person Aggrieved" Under Section 199 CrPC    |     Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention Violates Fundamental Right to Speedy Trial: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in Murder Conspiracy Case    |     Prosecution Failed to Prove Identity of the Exhumed Body: Supreme Court Acquits Police Officers in Custodial Death Case    |     Sacrosanct Duty of Husband to Financially Support Wife, Even if Able-Bodied and of Limited Means: Delhi HC Upholds Wife’s Maintenance    |     Delay in Filing FIR Undermines Credibility of Threat Allegations Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition for Bail Cancellation    |     False Claims Shake Court's Trust in Legal Proceedings: Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Premature Release After False Statements on Imprisonment Duration    |    

Supreme Court Upholds Cadre Merger in Education Department: "Policy Decision Generally Not to Be Interfered With"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India today upheld the merger of cadres in the Education Department, dismissing the appeals filed against the decision. The bench, comprising Justice Rajesh Bindal, delivered a judgment affirming the High Court's earlier decision, emphasizing the principle that "merger of cadres is a policy decision which cannot generally be interfered with."

The appeals, Civil Appeal Nos. 786 and 787 of 2013, challenged the order dated April 9, 1999, which merged the staff of the Adult Education Department with the Education Department and provided category-wise seniority. The appellants, who were already working in the Education Department, sought to quash this merger order.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court meticulously examined the posts, responsibilities, and pay scales involved in the merger and concluded that they were at the same level. This scrutiny led the court to dismiss the appellants' claims for a lack of substantial grounds for interference.

Justice Bindal, in his judgment, stated, "The level of posts being merged was examined and it was opined that these were at the same level. The argument raised by the writ petitioners before the High Court that there could be a better policy could not be a ground to quash the same."

The judgment also addressed concerns regarding personal liberty and seniority impacted by the merger. The court noted the significant delay in raising the issue, with many officers having been promoted or retired in the 24 years since the merger. "Other officers in the cadre who may be likely to be affected immediately with the merger, were not aggrieved with the action of the State," the judgment read.

This decision marks a pivotal moment in the legal discourse surrounding government policy decisions and their judicial review. The Supreme Court's stance reiterates the limited scope of judicial interference in policy matters, particularly when the decisions involve intricate administrative details and long-standing practices.

Date of Decision: 12 December  2023.

PRAFFUL SHUKLA AND OTHERS VS GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH

 

Similar News