Contradictions In Eyewitness Accounts And Suppression Of Crucial Evidence Weaken The Prosecution's Case: Telangana High Court High Court of Sikkim Sets Aside Trial Court’s Decision on Maintainability of Suit: Preliminary Issues Must Be Purely of Law Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Procedure, Says High Court Writ Petitions Against Civil Court Orders Must Be Under Article 227: Patna High Court Reiterates Jurisdictional Boundaries Kerala High Court Upholds Eviction, Rejects Sub-Tenant's Kudikidappu Claim Contractual Employment Does Not Confer Right to Regularization: Jharkhand High Court Divorced Wife Entitled to Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act for Past Domestic Violence: Bombay High Court Tenants Cannot Prescribe How Landlords Utilize Their Property: Delhi High Court Validates Eviction Labour Commissioner to Decide Petitioner’s Date of Birth Claim within Three Months, Ensuring Proper Verification and Consideration of Evidence: Uttarakhand High Court Concealment of Health Condition and False Allegations Amount to Cruelty: Gujarat High Court Upholds Divorce Decree Possession Implies Constructive Notice: Duty to Inquire Rests on Subsequent Purchasers: Supreme Court Clarifies Bona Fide Purchase Standards Judicial Proceedings Cannot Be Instituted After Four Years: MP High Court in Quashing FIR Against Retired Engineer Orissa High Court Invalidates Lecturer Recruitment Advertisements for Non-Compliance with UGC Standards Public Interest Jurisdiction Not a Substitute for Private Litigation: Karnataka High Court Declines PIL Cognizance under Section 188 IPC is illegal without a public servant’s complaint:Kerala High Court Juvenile Justice Act Prevails Over Recruitment Rules: Madras High Court Rules Juvenile Records Cannot Bar Employment in Police Services" Calcutta High Court Quashes MR Distributorship Selection Due to Irregularities in Godown Compliance and Selection Process Once the driver has established the validity of his license, the insurer cannot escape liability without conclusive proof to the contrary: J&K HC Belated Claims Cannot Be Entertained: Kerala High Court Overturns CAT Decision on Date of Birth Correction DNA Tests Cannot Supersede Established Legal Presumptions: Himachal Pradesh HC Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides VAT Act: Secured Creditor's Charge Has Priority Over State's Tax Dues: Gujrat High Court High Court of Delhi Clarifies Jurisdiction in Commercial Dispute: 'Procedural Efficiency Must Be Upheld Power Under Section 319 CrPC Cannot Be Exercised Without Prima Facie Case Beyond Contradictions: Supreme Court Motive Alone Insufficient for Conviction Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Supreme Court Ensures Equal Financial Benefits for All High Court Judges: Discrimination Based on Recruitment Source Struck Down Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Four Accused: Cites Contradictory Dying Declarations and Lack of Independent Evidence in Murder Case Evidence Corroborates Violent Robbery and Recovery of Stolen Articles: Calcutta High Court Upholds Conviction in Burrabazar Dacoity Case Failure to Implead Contesting Candidates is Fatal; Fundamental Defect Cannot Be Cured: Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Magistrate Not Functus Officio Post-Final Order in Maintenance Cases: Allahabad High Court Substantial Questions of Law a Must in Second Appeals, Reiterates Andhra Pradesh High Court Inconsistencies and Procedural Lapses: Allahabad High Court Acquits Four in Neeta Singh Murder Case

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment Process of Election Commissioners; Dismisses Pleas for Re-selection

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, upheld the appointment process of Election Commissioners under the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023. The bench dismissed multiple petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the appointment procedure, specifically Section 7(1) of the Act.

Legal Context and Challenge: The petitions, filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, raised concerns over the appointment process, especially the replacement of the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the Selection Committee. Petitioners argued that this change jeopardized the transparency and fairness essential to democracy. They also highlighted procedural irregularities in the selection process.

Union of India’s Stance: In response, the Union of India justified the 2023 Act, detailing the formation and actions of the Selection and Search Committees. The Union emphasized the importance of the preponed selection meeting and the constitution of the committees, alongside the resignation of an Election Commissioner.

Court’s Assessment: The Court exercised judicial restraint, emphasizing the importance of not granting interim orders in cases questioning the constitutionality of legislation unless a provision is evidently unconstitutional. The bench refused to direct a re-selection process with the Chief Justice of India on the committee, stating it would amount to the Court creating new law.

Impact on Elections: Acknowledging the upcoming 18th General Elections for the Lok Sabha, the Court declined to intervene in the appointment of Election Commissioners, citing potential confusion and constitutional breakdown.

Procedural Concerns: While the Court expressed concern over the procedural shortcomings in the selection process, it refrained from issuing any directives, underscoring the need for proper deliberation and examination of candidates’ backgrounds in such important appointments.

Conclusion and Dismissal of Applications: The Supreme Court dismissed the applications for stay and other related applications, clarifying that its observations are tentative and not final as the matter remains sub-judice.

Date of Decision: 22nd January 2024.

Dr. Jaya Thakur & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr.,

Similar News