IBC Moratorium Under Part III Does Not Shield Directors From Personal Criminal Liability In Cheque Bounce Cases U/S 138 NI: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act Is Predominantly Criminal; IBC Moratorium Stays Recovery Of Compensation But Not Prosecution: Supreme Court Refers To 3-Judge Bench Bus Driver Not Negligent If Vehicle Moved Based On Conductor's Whistle; Not Expected To Look Back For Alighting Passengers: Supreme Court Compassionate Assistance Received By Widow Cannot Be Deducted To Negate Compensation Payable To Dependent Mother Ineligible For Such Benefit: Supreme Court Section 37 Jurisdiction Is A Narrowing Pyramid; Courts Should Not Reopen Settled Jurisdictional Issues: Supreme Court Arbitration Award Passed Without Court Leave During Pendency Of Suit Is Unenforceable Under 1940 Act: Supreme Court Notice In Mutation Proceedings Constitutes Constructive Notice Of Probate; Revocation Plea Barred By Limitation: Supreme Court Breach Of Position Limits Is A Regulatory Infraction, Not Automatic Market Fraud; Supreme Court Sets Aside Reliance RPL Disgorgement Order Mere Breach Of Position Limits Not 'Fraud' Under PFUTP Regulations Unless Manipulation Or Inducement Is Proven: Supreme Court SC Awards ₹11 Lakh Compensation To Convict For 24-Day Delay In Release; Says State Must 'Obey First, Appeal Later' Compensation For Village Fazalwas Land Acquisition No Longer Res Integra; Supreme Court Dismisses Enhancement Claim Citing Previous Precedent Uncommunicated Adverse Remarks Cannot Form Basis To Terminate Probationer; Violates Natural Justice: Supreme Court Employer Cannot Use 'Unsatisfactory Performance' As Guise To Bypass Disciplinary Inquiry For Misconduct: Supreme Court Statutory Body Cannot Act As Both Investigator And Judge; Adjudicatory Process Must Be Neutrally Conducted: Supreme Court Removal Of Mathadhipati Vitiated If Relied-Upon Documents Not Supplied; Service By Affixation On Seized Premises Is A Legal Absurdity: Supreme Court Serving Notice By Affixing It To Door Of Premises Already Seized By State Is A Legal Absurdity: Supreme Court Initiating Criminal Case After Final Settlement Of Loan Account Is An Abuse Of Process; Sanctity Of OTS Must Be Protected: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Under Sections 420 & 471 IPC Cannot Continue After Bank Loan Settlement Approved By DRT: Supreme Court RTE Act: Use Of 'Teacher' In Section 23 Shows Intent To Make TET Mandatory For In-Service Staff, Not Retrospective: Supreme Court Service Of Teachers Cannot Come At Cost Of Educational Future Of Children: Supreme Court Extends TET Deadline To 2028 Right To Know Biological Father Prevails Over Right To Privacy; DNA Test Can Be Ordered To Resolve Paternity: Supreme Court DNA | Child’s Right To Identity & Closure Outweighs Putative Father’s Right To Privacy In Paternity Disputes: Supreme Court Approver’s Testimony Doesn’t Require Corroboration Of Every Material Circumstance; Rule Of Prudence Requires Only Connecting Link To Accused: Supreme Court Conspirator Liable For All 'Reasonably Foreseeable' Crimes Committed By Others In Furtherance Of Conspiracy: Supreme Court Rent Enhancement Orders Under UP Rent Act Must Apply Retrospectively From Date Of Filing Application: Supreme Court High Court Can’t Enhance Rent Under Article 227 Based On Mere Statements Without Evidence; Power To Be Exercised Sparingly: Supreme Court Parrot Testimony | Verbatim Repetition Of Allegations In Child's Statement Indicates Tutoring; POCSO Complaint Filed As 'Counter-Blast' Liable To Be Quashed: Supreme Court Matrimonial Disputes Often Witness Vague POCSO Allegations To Settle Personal Scores: Supreme Court Quashes Case Against Husband & In-Laws

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment Process of Election Commissioners; Dismisses Pleas for Re-selection

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, upheld the appointment process of Election Commissioners under the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023. The bench dismissed multiple petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the appointment procedure, specifically Section 7(1) of the Act.

Legal Context and Challenge: The petitions, filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, raised concerns over the appointment process, especially the replacement of the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the Selection Committee. Petitioners argued that this change jeopardized the transparency and fairness essential to democracy. They also highlighted procedural irregularities in the selection process.

Union of India’s Stance: In response, the Union of India justified the 2023 Act, detailing the formation and actions of the Selection and Search Committees. The Union emphasized the importance of the preponed selection meeting and the constitution of the committees, alongside the resignation of an Election Commissioner.

Court’s Assessment: The Court exercised judicial restraint, emphasizing the importance of not granting interim orders in cases questioning the constitutionality of legislation unless a provision is evidently unconstitutional. The bench refused to direct a re-selection process with the Chief Justice of India on the committee, stating it would amount to the Court creating new law.

Impact on Elections: Acknowledging the upcoming 18th General Elections for the Lok Sabha, the Court declined to intervene in the appointment of Election Commissioners, citing potential confusion and constitutional breakdown.

Procedural Concerns: While the Court expressed concern over the procedural shortcomings in the selection process, it refrained from issuing any directives, underscoring the need for proper deliberation and examination of candidates’ backgrounds in such important appointments.

Conclusion and Dismissal of Applications: The Supreme Court dismissed the applications for stay and other related applications, clarifying that its observations are tentative and not final as the matter remains sub-judice.

Date of Decision: 22nd January 2024.

Dr. Jaya Thakur & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr.,

Latest Legal News