Confiscation Of Vehicle Under Section 49 Assam Forest Regulation Is Only Temporary; Final Confiscation Requires Conviction Under Section 51: Gauhati High Court Amendment Of Written Statement Cannot Be Allowed After Trial Commences If Facts Were Within Party's Knowledge: Delhi High Court Section 149 IPC Cannot Be Invoked If Number Of Convicted Persons Falls Below Five After Acquittal Of Co-Accused: Allahabad High Court Requirement Of 'Clear Seven Days' Notice For No-Confidence Motion Under West Bengal Panchayat Act Is Procedural, Not Mandatory: Calcutta High Court Cooperative Society’s General Body Cannot Ratify Appointment Made In Violation Of Statutory Rules: Punjab & Haryana High Court Registered Will Executed In Hospital Carries Presumption Of Genuineness; Illness Doesn't Equal Unsound Mind: Delhi High Court Exacting Work From Teachers Without Paying Salary Amounts To 'Begar', Violates Article 23: Bombay High Court General & Omnibus Charge Sheet Lacking Individual Roles Of Accused In Matrimonial Case Is Abuse Of Process: Calcutta High Court Admission Of Claim By IRP Not An 'Acknowledgment Of Liability' Under Section 18 Limitation Act To Extend Limitation: Supreme Court Special Appeal Against Order Refusing To Initiate Contempt Proceedings Not Maintainable If Merits Of Original Case Not Decided: Allahabad High Court Prior Sanction Not Required For Magistrate To Direct FIR Registration Under Section 156(3) CrPC; It Is A Pre-Cognizance Stage: Supreme Court Courts Cannot Create Or Expand Criminal Offences In Absence Of Legislative Action: Supreme Court Rejects Plea For Specific Hate Speech Law State Cannot Reopen Regularisation Issues That Attained Finality; ISRO Must Grant Permanent Status To Daily-Wagers: Supreme Court Plaintiffs Seeking Declaration Of Title Must Succeed On Strength Of Own Title, Not Weakness Of Defendant’s Case: Andhra Pradesh High Court Interest Of Justice Demands Child Of Tender Age Remains In Mother's Custody: Himachal Pradesh High Court

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment Process of Election Commissioners; Dismisses Pleas for Re-selection

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, upheld the appointment process of Election Commissioners under the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023. The bench dismissed multiple petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the appointment procedure, specifically Section 7(1) of the Act.

Legal Context and Challenge: The petitions, filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, raised concerns over the appointment process, especially the replacement of the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the Selection Committee. Petitioners argued that this change jeopardized the transparency and fairness essential to democracy. They also highlighted procedural irregularities in the selection process.

Union of India’s Stance: In response, the Union of India justified the 2023 Act, detailing the formation and actions of the Selection and Search Committees. The Union emphasized the importance of the preponed selection meeting and the constitution of the committees, alongside the resignation of an Election Commissioner.

Court’s Assessment: The Court exercised judicial restraint, emphasizing the importance of not granting interim orders in cases questioning the constitutionality of legislation unless a provision is evidently unconstitutional. The bench refused to direct a re-selection process with the Chief Justice of India on the committee, stating it would amount to the Court creating new law.

Impact on Elections: Acknowledging the upcoming 18th General Elections for the Lok Sabha, the Court declined to intervene in the appointment of Election Commissioners, citing potential confusion and constitutional breakdown.

Procedural Concerns: While the Court expressed concern over the procedural shortcomings in the selection process, it refrained from issuing any directives, underscoring the need for proper deliberation and examination of candidates’ backgrounds in such important appointments.

Conclusion and Dismissal of Applications: The Supreme Court dismissed the applications for stay and other related applications, clarifying that its observations are tentative and not final as the matter remains sub-judice.

Date of Decision: 22nd January 2024.

Dr. Jaya Thakur & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr.,

Latest Legal News