MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment Process of Election Commissioners; Dismisses Pleas for Re-selection

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, upheld the appointment process of Election Commissioners under the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023. The bench dismissed multiple petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the appointment procedure, specifically Section 7(1) of the Act.

Legal Context and Challenge: The petitions, filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, raised concerns over the appointment process, especially the replacement of the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the Selection Committee. Petitioners argued that this change jeopardized the transparency and fairness essential to democracy. They also highlighted procedural irregularities in the selection process.

Union of India’s Stance: In response, the Union of India justified the 2023 Act, detailing the formation and actions of the Selection and Search Committees. The Union emphasized the importance of the preponed selection meeting and the constitution of the committees, alongside the resignation of an Election Commissioner.

Court’s Assessment: The Court exercised judicial restraint, emphasizing the importance of not granting interim orders in cases questioning the constitutionality of legislation unless a provision is evidently unconstitutional. The bench refused to direct a re-selection process with the Chief Justice of India on the committee, stating it would amount to the Court creating new law.

Impact on Elections: Acknowledging the upcoming 18th General Elections for the Lok Sabha, the Court declined to intervene in the appointment of Election Commissioners, citing potential confusion and constitutional breakdown.

Procedural Concerns: While the Court expressed concern over the procedural shortcomings in the selection process, it refrained from issuing any directives, underscoring the need for proper deliberation and examination of candidates’ backgrounds in such important appointments.

Conclusion and Dismissal of Applications: The Supreme Court dismissed the applications for stay and other related applications, clarifying that its observations are tentative and not final as the matter remains sub-judice.

Date of Decision: 22nd January 2024.

Dr. Jaya Thakur & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr.,

Latest Legal News