Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Stresses Effective Support for Child Victims of Sexual Offences, Orders Stringent Implementation of Support Person System

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment delivered on August 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the crucial need for creating a secure and supportive environment for child victims of sexual offences. The judgment, authored by Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Justice Aravind Kumar, underscored the significance of effective support mechanisms in aiding victims throughout the investigation and trial process under The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act).

"Behaviour - physical, verbal, and non-verbal, ranging from what discomfits a child to as horrifying as rape and physical sexual abuse have been criminalized. Special mechanisms to provide access to the justice delivery system, and ensure speedy justice, have been devised," observed the court, highlighting the legislative intent behind the enactment of the POCSO Act.

The case, originating from the struggles of an individual victim seeking justice, shed light on the challenges victims and their families face while navigating the complex legal processes involved in prosecuting offences under the POCSO Act. The judgment underscored the need for a 'support person' as envisioned in the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules, 2020 (POCSO Rules, 2020), who could provide crucial assistance to victims throughout their ordeal.

The court directed the State of Uttar Pradesh to take proactive measures in implementing the support person system. It laid out a comprehensive framework, involving guidelines for selection, appointment, training, and remuneration of support persons, with a focus on their qualifications and expertise. The court highlighted the necessity of continuous training to ensure that support persons could provide not only legal guidance but also emotional support to child victims.

Justice Bhat and Justice Kumar emphasized, "The existing monitoring framework under Rule 12, although a step in the right direction, needs to be enhanced to ensure strict and effective implementation of the support person system. The role of support persons, whether engaged externally or from District Child Protection Units, must be clearly defined and their progress regularly monitored."

The judgment acknowledged that a support person could play a pivotal role in offering encouragement, reassurance, and guidance to victims, translating to more just outcomes in terms of both prosecution and rehabilitation. It stressed that justice in cases of child sexual abuse is not merely about apprehending the offender and imposing punishment but also about providing victims with adequate support, care, and security to facilitate their healing and recovery.

The Ministry of Women and Child Development was also directed to bring the judgment to the notice of the National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), which, in accordance with Rule 12(1)(c), would monitor the progress of all states in framing guidelines to ensure the effective implementation of the support person system.

Date of Decision: August 18, 2023

BACHPAN BACHAO ANDOLAN  vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.      

Latest Legal News