Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Stresses Effective Support for Child Victims of Sexual Offences, Orders Stringent Implementation of Support Person System

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment delivered on August 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the crucial need for creating a secure and supportive environment for child victims of sexual offences. The judgment, authored by Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Justice Aravind Kumar, underscored the significance of effective support mechanisms in aiding victims throughout the investigation and trial process under The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act).

"Behaviour - physical, verbal, and non-verbal, ranging from what discomfits a child to as horrifying as rape and physical sexual abuse have been criminalized. Special mechanisms to provide access to the justice delivery system, and ensure speedy justice, have been devised," observed the court, highlighting the legislative intent behind the enactment of the POCSO Act.

The case, originating from the struggles of an individual victim seeking justice, shed light on the challenges victims and their families face while navigating the complex legal processes involved in prosecuting offences under the POCSO Act. The judgment underscored the need for a 'support person' as envisioned in the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules, 2020 (POCSO Rules, 2020), who could provide crucial assistance to victims throughout their ordeal.

The court directed the State of Uttar Pradesh to take proactive measures in implementing the support person system. It laid out a comprehensive framework, involving guidelines for selection, appointment, training, and remuneration of support persons, with a focus on their qualifications and expertise. The court highlighted the necessity of continuous training to ensure that support persons could provide not only legal guidance but also emotional support to child victims.

Justice Bhat and Justice Kumar emphasized, "The existing monitoring framework under Rule 12, although a step in the right direction, needs to be enhanced to ensure strict and effective implementation of the support person system. The role of support persons, whether engaged externally or from District Child Protection Units, must be clearly defined and their progress regularly monitored."

The judgment acknowledged that a support person could play a pivotal role in offering encouragement, reassurance, and guidance to victims, translating to more just outcomes in terms of both prosecution and rehabilitation. It stressed that justice in cases of child sexual abuse is not merely about apprehending the offender and imposing punishment but also about providing victims with adequate support, care, and security to facilitate their healing and recovery.

The Ministry of Women and Child Development was also directed to bring the judgment to the notice of the National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), which, in accordance with Rule 12(1)(c), would monitor the progress of all states in framing guidelines to ensure the effective implementation of the support person system.

Date of Decision: August 18, 2023

BACHPAN BACHAO ANDOLAN  vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.      

Latest Legal News