No Work No Pay: Delhi High Court Denies Back Wages To Reinstated Army Officer State Cannot Use 'Delay & Laches' To Evade Compensation For Land Taken Without Authority Of Law: Calcutta High Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Jail Appeal Solely On 3157-Day Delay; Orders Release Of Life Convict After 22 Years In Jail 138 NI Act | Failure To Produce Income Tax Returns Not Fatal To Cheque Bounce Case If Debt Is Established: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Public Records Not In Party's 'Power Or Possession' Until Actually Obtained; Leave Not Required For Rebuttal Documents: AP High Court For Conviction Under Section 34 IPC, Prosecution Must Establish Prior Meeting Of Minds & Pre-Arranged Plan: Allahabad High Court Merciless Beating With Blunt Side Of Deadly Weapons To Spread Terror Constitutes Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court CIT Can’t Invoke Revisionary Jurisdiction Merely Because AO’s Enquiry Was ‘Inadequate’ If View Is Plausible: Bombay High Court Mere Presence At Crime Scene Without Proof Of Prior Concert Insufficient To Invoke Section 34 IPC For Murder: Supreme Court Courts Cannot Be Used As Tools For Coercion: Bombay HC Dismisses Application To Implead Developer Without Contractual Nexus, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Cost Specific Performance Cannot Be Granted For Contingent Contracts Dependent On Third-Party Conveyance: Madras High Court Unlawful Subletting Is A ‘Continuing Wrong’, Fresh Limitation Period Runs As Long As Breach Continues: Bombay High Court Courts Must Specify Payment Timeline In Specific Performance Decrees; Order XX Rule 12A CPC Is Mandatory: Supreme Court Specific Performance Decree Does Not Automatically Rescind Due To Delay; Courts Can Extend Time For Deposit: Supreme Court Madras High Court Quashes Forgery Case Against Mahindra World City After Victims Accept Alternate Land In Settlement Motor Accident Claims: 13-Day FIR Delay Not Fatal; 80% Physical Disability Can Be Treated As 100% Functional Disability: Punjab & Haryana HC Murderer Cannot Inherit Property From Victim Through Wills; Section 25 Hindu Succession Act Bar Applies To Testamentary Succession: Supreme Court Courts Must Pierce Veil Of Clever Drafting To Reject Suits Barred By Benami Law; 2016 Amendments Are Retrospective: Supreme Court Indian Railways Is A Consumer, Not A Deemed Distribution Licensee; Must Pay Cross-Subsidy Surcharge For Open Access: Supreme Court Technical Rules Of Evidence Act Do Not Apply To Departmental Enquiries: Supreme Court Public Employment Cannot Be Converted Into An Instrument Of Fraud; Police Personnel Using Dual Identity Strikes At Root Of Service: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Stringent Guidelines for Divorce on Irretrievable Breakdown Grounds: Divorce Petition Dismissed

06 September 2024 5:47 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment delivered on October 10th, 2023, the Supreme Court of India has set stringent guidelines for granting divorces on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. The ruling comes as a significant development in divorce law, as it emphasizes the importance of maintaining the sanctity of marriage while considering divorce cases.

The apex court's decision, authored by Justice Bela M. Trivedi, underscores that the irretrievable breakdown of marriage, while recognized as a ground for divorce under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, should be exercised with great care and caution. The court outlined a series of factors to be considered before granting a divorce on this ground.

Supreme Court held that  "Grant of divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage by this Court is not a matter of right, but a discretion which is to be exercised with great care and caution, keeping in mind several factors ensuring that 'complete justice' is done to both parties."

The Supreme Court clarified that the court must be fully convinced that the marriage is "totally unworkable, emotionally dead, and beyond salvation" for a divorce to be granted on these grounds. The ruling also highlights that the duration of separation should be sufficiently long, usually more than six years, and that the court must consider the economic and social status of the parties, including their educational qualifications and the welfare of any children involved.

The judgment further emphasized that despite the increasing trend of divorce cases, the institution of marriage still plays a crucial role in society. The court acknowledged that while divorce is a legal option, it should be exercised cautiously, considering the impact on the individuals involved and the societal norms.

In this specific case, where the husband and wife were aged 89 and 82, respectively, and had been married since 1963, the court declined to grant a divorce based on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown. The court took into account the wife's willingness to continue the marriage and her sentiment against being labeled a "divorcee."

This judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications for divorce cases in India, emphasizing the importance of preserving the institution of marriage while also providing a framework for considering divorces based on irretrievable breakdown grounds.

Date of Decision: 10 October 2023

NIRMAL SINGH PANESAR vs MRS. PARAMJIT KAUR PANESAR

Latest Legal News