Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Sets Stringent Guidelines for Divorce on Irretrievable Breakdown Grounds: Divorce Petition Dismissed

06 September 2024 5:47 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment delivered on October 10th, 2023, the Supreme Court of India has set stringent guidelines for granting divorces on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. The ruling comes as a significant development in divorce law, as it emphasizes the importance of maintaining the sanctity of marriage while considering divorce cases.

The apex court's decision, authored by Justice Bela M. Trivedi, underscores that the irretrievable breakdown of marriage, while recognized as a ground for divorce under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, should be exercised with great care and caution. The court outlined a series of factors to be considered before granting a divorce on this ground.

Supreme Court held that  "Grant of divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage by this Court is not a matter of right, but a discretion which is to be exercised with great care and caution, keeping in mind several factors ensuring that 'complete justice' is done to both parties."

The Supreme Court clarified that the court must be fully convinced that the marriage is "totally unworkable, emotionally dead, and beyond salvation" for a divorce to be granted on these grounds. The ruling also highlights that the duration of separation should be sufficiently long, usually more than six years, and that the court must consider the economic and social status of the parties, including their educational qualifications and the welfare of any children involved.

The judgment further emphasized that despite the increasing trend of divorce cases, the institution of marriage still plays a crucial role in society. The court acknowledged that while divorce is a legal option, it should be exercised cautiously, considering the impact on the individuals involved and the societal norms.

In this specific case, where the husband and wife were aged 89 and 82, respectively, and had been married since 1963, the court declined to grant a divorce based on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown. The court took into account the wife's willingness to continue the marriage and her sentiment against being labeled a "divorcee."

This judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications for divorce cases in India, emphasizing the importance of preserving the institution of marriage while also providing a framework for considering divorces based on irretrievable breakdown grounds.

Date of Decision: 10 October 2023

NIRMAL SINGH PANESAR vs MRS. PARAMJIT KAUR PANESAR

Latest Legal News