Seniority Must Be Calculated From the Date of Initial Appointment, Not Regularization: Madras High Court Rules Section 319 Cr.P.C. | Mere Association Not Enough for Criminal Liability: Karnataka HC Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds ₹25,000 Per Kanal Compensation for Land Acquired for Nangal-Talwara Railway Line, Dismisses Railway’s Appeal No Work No Pay Principle Not Applicable: Orissa High Court Orders Reinstatement and Full Back Wages for Wrongfully Terminated Lecturer No Assault, No Obstruction, Only Words Exchanged: Bombay High Court Quashes Charges of Obstruction Against Advocates Under Section 353 IPC Matrimonial Offences Can Be Quashed Even if Non-Compoundable, When Genuine Compromise Is Reached: J&K HC Plaintiff Entitled to Partition, But Must Contribute Redemption Share to Defendant: Delhi High Court Clarifies Subrogation Rights in Mortgage Redemption Labeling Someone A 'Rowdy' Without Convictions Infringes Personal Liberty And Reputation: Kerala High Court P&H High Court Denies Pensionary Benefits for Work-Charged Employee's Widow; Declares Work-Charged Service Not Eligible for ACP or Pension Benefits Acquittal is Acquittal: Rajasthan High Court Orders Appointment of Candidate Denied Job Over Past FIR At The Bail Stage, Culpability Is Not To Be Decided; Allegations Must Be Tested During Trial: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in SCST Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to "Secular" and "Socialist" Additions in Constitution Preamble Supreme Court Rejects Res Judicata in Land Allotment Case: Fresh Cause of Action Validates Public Interest Litigation Public Resources Are Not Privileges for the Few: Supreme Court Declares Preferential Land Allotments to Elites Unconstitutional Past antecedents alone cannot justify denial of bail: Kerala High Court Grants Bail Revenue Records Alone Cannot Prove Ownership: Madras High Court Dismisses Temple's Appeal for Injunction Humanitarian Grounds Cannot Undermine Investigation: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Interim Bail in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam The Power Under Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 CPC is Drastic and Extraordinary; Should Not Be Exercised Mechanically or Merely for the Asking: Calcutta High Court Telangana High Court Strikes Down Section 10-A: Upholds Transparency in Public Employment Absence of Homogeneous Mixing and Procedural Deficiencies Vitiate NDPS Conviction: Punjab and Haryana High Court Business Disputes Cannot Be Given Criminal Color: Patna High Court Quashes Complaint in Trademark Agreement Case Gujarat High Court Appoints Wife as Guardian of Comatose Husband, Calls for Legislative Framework Standard of Proof in Professional Misconduct Requires 'Higher Threshold' but Below 'Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Delhi High Court Imprisonment Cannot Bar Education: Bombay HC Allows UAPA Accused to Pursue LL.B. High Court Acquits Accused in Double Murder Case, Asserts ‘Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof’ Long separation and irreparable breakdown of marriage must be read as cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Regulation 101 Applies to All Aided Institutions, Including Minority Ones, Says Allahabad High Court Fraud Unravels All Judicial Acts : Jharkhand High Court Orders Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Ratan Heights Case Suspicious Circumstances Cannot Validate a Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds 1997 Will Over 2000 Will

Supreme Court Sets Stringent Guidelines for Divorce on Irretrievable Breakdown Grounds: Divorce Petition Dismissed

06 September 2024 5:47 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment delivered on October 10th, 2023, the Supreme Court of India has set stringent guidelines for granting divorces on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. The ruling comes as a significant development in divorce law, as it emphasizes the importance of maintaining the sanctity of marriage while considering divorce cases.

The apex court's decision, authored by Justice Bela M. Trivedi, underscores that the irretrievable breakdown of marriage, while recognized as a ground for divorce under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, should be exercised with great care and caution. The court outlined a series of factors to be considered before granting a divorce on this ground.

Supreme Court held that  "Grant of divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage by this Court is not a matter of right, but a discretion which is to be exercised with great care and caution, keeping in mind several factors ensuring that 'complete justice' is done to both parties."

The Supreme Court clarified that the court must be fully convinced that the marriage is "totally unworkable, emotionally dead, and beyond salvation" for a divorce to be granted on these grounds. The ruling also highlights that the duration of separation should be sufficiently long, usually more than six years, and that the court must consider the economic and social status of the parties, including their educational qualifications and the welfare of any children involved.

The judgment further emphasized that despite the increasing trend of divorce cases, the institution of marriage still plays a crucial role in society. The court acknowledged that while divorce is a legal option, it should be exercised cautiously, considering the impact on the individuals involved and the societal norms.

In this specific case, where the husband and wife were aged 89 and 82, respectively, and had been married since 1963, the court declined to grant a divorce based on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown. The court took into account the wife's willingness to continue the marriage and her sentiment against being labeled a "divorcee."

This judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications for divorce cases in India, emphasizing the importance of preserving the institution of marriage while also providing a framework for considering divorces based on irretrievable breakdown grounds.

Date of Decision: 10 October 2023

NIRMAL SINGH PANESAR vs MRS. PARAMJIT KAUR PANESAR

Similar News