Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

Supreme Court Sets Stringent Guidelines for Divorce on Irretrievable Breakdown Grounds: Divorce Petition Dismissed

06 September 2024 5:47 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment delivered on October 10th, 2023, the Supreme Court of India has set stringent guidelines for granting divorces on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. The ruling comes as a significant development in divorce law, as it emphasizes the importance of maintaining the sanctity of marriage while considering divorce cases.

The apex court's decision, authored by Justice Bela M. Trivedi, underscores that the irretrievable breakdown of marriage, while recognized as a ground for divorce under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, should be exercised with great care and caution. The court outlined a series of factors to be considered before granting a divorce on this ground.

Supreme Court held that  "Grant of divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage by this Court is not a matter of right, but a discretion which is to be exercised with great care and caution, keeping in mind several factors ensuring that 'complete justice' is done to both parties."

The Supreme Court clarified that the court must be fully convinced that the marriage is "totally unworkable, emotionally dead, and beyond salvation" for a divorce to be granted on these grounds. The ruling also highlights that the duration of separation should be sufficiently long, usually more than six years, and that the court must consider the economic and social status of the parties, including their educational qualifications and the welfare of any children involved.

The judgment further emphasized that despite the increasing trend of divorce cases, the institution of marriage still plays a crucial role in society. The court acknowledged that while divorce is a legal option, it should be exercised cautiously, considering the impact on the individuals involved and the societal norms.

In this specific case, where the husband and wife were aged 89 and 82, respectively, and had been married since 1963, the court declined to grant a divorce based on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown. The court took into account the wife's willingness to continue the marriage and her sentiment against being labeled a "divorcee."

This judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications for divorce cases in India, emphasizing the importance of preserving the institution of marriage while also providing a framework for considering divorces based on irretrievable breakdown grounds.

Date of Decision: 10 October 2023

NIRMAL SINGH PANESAR vs MRS. PARAMJIT KAUR PANESAR

Latest Legal News