Bail | Right to Speedy Trial is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21: PH High Court    |     Postal Department’s Power to Enhance Penalties Time-Barred, Rules Allahabad High Court    |     Tenants Cannot Cross-Examine Landlords Unless Relationship is Disputed: Madras High Court    |     NDPS | Conscious Possession Extends to Vehicle Drivers: Telangana High Court Upholds 10-Year Sentence in Ganja Trafficking Case    |     Aid Reduction Of Without Due Process Unlawful: Rajasthan High Court Restores Full Grants for Educational Institutions    |     Assessment of Notional Income in Absence of Proof Cannot Be 'Mathematically Precise,' Says Patna High Court    |     NCLT's Resolution Plan Overrides State Tax Claims: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Demands Against Patanjali Foods    |     An Agreement is Not Voidable if the Party Could Discover the Truth with Ordinary Diligence: Calcutta High Court Quashes Termination of LPG Distributorship License    |     Independent Witnesses Contradict Prosecution's Story: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquit Accused in Arson Case    |     Merely Being a Joint Account Holder Does Not Attract Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act:  Gujarat High Court    |     Higher Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perversity is Found: Himachal Pradesh High Court Refused to Enhance Maintenance    |     Perpetual Lease Allows Division of Property: Delhi High Court Affirms Partition and Validity of Purdah Wall    |     "Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Videography in Temple Premises Limited to Religious Functions: Kerala High Court Orders to Restrict Non-Religious Activities on Temple Premises    |     Past Service Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Affirms Pension Rights for Daily Wage Employees    |     'Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ Does Not Mean Beyond All Doubt: Madras High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Man Convicted of Murdering Mother-in-Law    |    

Supreme Court Sets Stringent Guidelines for Divorce on Irretrievable Breakdown Grounds: Divorce Petition Dismissed

06 September 2024 5:47 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment delivered on October 10th, 2023, the Supreme Court of India has set stringent guidelines for granting divorces on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. The ruling comes as a significant development in divorce law, as it emphasizes the importance of maintaining the sanctity of marriage while considering divorce cases.

The apex court's decision, authored by Justice Bela M. Trivedi, underscores that the irretrievable breakdown of marriage, while recognized as a ground for divorce under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, should be exercised with great care and caution. The court outlined a series of factors to be considered before granting a divorce on this ground.

Supreme Court held that  "Grant of divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage by this Court is not a matter of right, but a discretion which is to be exercised with great care and caution, keeping in mind several factors ensuring that 'complete justice' is done to both parties."

The Supreme Court clarified that the court must be fully convinced that the marriage is "totally unworkable, emotionally dead, and beyond salvation" for a divorce to be granted on these grounds. The ruling also highlights that the duration of separation should be sufficiently long, usually more than six years, and that the court must consider the economic and social status of the parties, including their educational qualifications and the welfare of any children involved.

The judgment further emphasized that despite the increasing trend of divorce cases, the institution of marriage still plays a crucial role in society. The court acknowledged that while divorce is a legal option, it should be exercised cautiously, considering the impact on the individuals involved and the societal norms.

In this specific case, where the husband and wife were aged 89 and 82, respectively, and had been married since 1963, the court declined to grant a divorce based on the grounds of irretrievable breakdown. The court took into account the wife's willingness to continue the marriage and her sentiment against being labeled a "divorcee."

This judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications for divorce cases in India, emphasizing the importance of preserving the institution of marriage while also providing a framework for considering divorces based on irretrievable breakdown grounds.

Date of Decision: 10 October 2023

NIRMAL SINGH PANESAR vs MRS. PARAMJIT KAUR PANESAR

Similar News