Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Compensation of Rs. 2 Crores Imposed on Jaipur Development Authority for STP Non-compliance”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the imposition of an interim compensation of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- (Rupees two crores) on the Jaipur Development Authority by the National Green Tribunal. The case stemmed from a finding that the sewage treatment plant (STP) operated by the appellant had been non-compliant for 135 days. The appellant did not dispute this finding but challenged the substantial amount of the imposed compensation.

The Court observed, “After having perused paragraph No.8 of the impugned judgment, we find that there is absolutely no reason recorded by the Tribunal for coming to the conclusion that the appellant is liable to pay a sum of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- towards the interim compensation.” The Court noted that the Tribunal did not provide reasons for rejecting the Committee of Experts’ proposed compensation of Rs. 33,75,000/- (Rupees thirty three lakhs seventy five thousand), which the appellant had already deposited.

Given the lack of recorded reasons for the imposition of the higher compensation amount, the Supreme Court has decided to remand the case back to the National Green Tribunal for a fresh reconsideration of the quantum of interim compensation. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal must hear the parties and decide on the interim compensation issue afresh. Until a new determination is made, the appellant’s deposited amount of Rs. 33,75,000/- shall be treated as interim compensation.

The appeal has been partly allowed by the Supreme Court, which has also urged the Tribunal to expedite the resolution of the interim compensation matter. This decision highlights the importance of providing proper reasoning for the imposition of compensation amounts and ensures a fair assessment of penalties in cases of non-compliance with environmental regulations.

Date of Decision: August 09, 2023.

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Jaipur_Development_Authority_vs_The_State_Of_Rajasthan_on_9_August_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News