Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Compensation of Rs. 2 Crores Imposed on Jaipur Development Authority for STP Non-compliance”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the imposition of an interim compensation of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- (Rupees two crores) on the Jaipur Development Authority by the National Green Tribunal. The case stemmed from a finding that the sewage treatment plant (STP) operated by the appellant had been non-compliant for 135 days. The appellant did not dispute this finding but challenged the substantial amount of the imposed compensation.

The Court observed, “After having perused paragraph No.8 of the impugned judgment, we find that there is absolutely no reason recorded by the Tribunal for coming to the conclusion that the appellant is liable to pay a sum of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- towards the interim compensation.” The Court noted that the Tribunal did not provide reasons for rejecting the Committee of Experts’ proposed compensation of Rs. 33,75,000/- (Rupees thirty three lakhs seventy five thousand), which the appellant had already deposited.

Given the lack of recorded reasons for the imposition of the higher compensation amount, the Supreme Court has decided to remand the case back to the National Green Tribunal for a fresh reconsideration of the quantum of interim compensation. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal must hear the parties and decide on the interim compensation issue afresh. Until a new determination is made, the appellant’s deposited amount of Rs. 33,75,000/- shall be treated as interim compensation.

The appeal has been partly allowed by the Supreme Court, which has also urged the Tribunal to expedite the resolution of the interim compensation matter. This decision highlights the importance of providing proper reasoning for the imposition of compensation amounts and ensures a fair assessment of penalties in cases of non-compliance with environmental regulations.

Date of Decision: August 09, 2023.

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Jaipur_Development_Authority_vs_The_State_Of_Rajasthan_on_9_August_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News