Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Compensation of Rs. 2 Crores Imposed on Jaipur Development Authority for STP Non-compliance”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the imposition of an interim compensation of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- (Rupees two crores) on the Jaipur Development Authority by the National Green Tribunal. The case stemmed from a finding that the sewage treatment plant (STP) operated by the appellant had been non-compliant for 135 days. The appellant did not dispute this finding but challenged the substantial amount of the imposed compensation.

The Court observed, “After having perused paragraph No.8 of the impugned judgment, we find that there is absolutely no reason recorded by the Tribunal for coming to the conclusion that the appellant is liable to pay a sum of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- towards the interim compensation.” The Court noted that the Tribunal did not provide reasons for rejecting the Committee of Experts’ proposed compensation of Rs. 33,75,000/- (Rupees thirty three lakhs seventy five thousand), which the appellant had already deposited.

Given the lack of recorded reasons for the imposition of the higher compensation amount, the Supreme Court has decided to remand the case back to the National Green Tribunal for a fresh reconsideration of the quantum of interim compensation. The Court emphasized that the Tribunal must hear the parties and decide on the interim compensation issue afresh. Until a new determination is made, the appellant’s deposited amount of Rs. 33,75,000/- shall be treated as interim compensation.

The appeal has been partly allowed by the Supreme Court, which has also urged the Tribunal to expedite the resolution of the interim compensation matter. This decision highlights the importance of providing proper reasoning for the imposition of compensation amounts and ensures a fair assessment of penalties in cases of non-compliance with environmental regulations.

Date of Decision: August 09, 2023.

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Jaipur_Development_Authority_vs_The_State_Of_Rajasthan_on_9_August_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News