Lethargy Is Not an Exceptional Circumstance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Striking Off of Defence for Delay in Filing Written Statement Vague Decree of Injunction Can’t Be Executed by Attaching Machines: Rajasthan High Court Strikes Down Execution Order Mere permission to join proceedings without allowing filing of written statement is illusory: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Proceedings Unregistered Power of Attorney Can’t Transfer Property: MP High Court Denies Title, Dismisses Ejectment Suit Mere Non-Recovery of Weapon Is Not Fatal When Circumstantial and Medical Evidence Prove Guilt Beyond Doubt: Allahabad High Court Failure to Examine Gazetted Officer and Magistrate Who Certified Seizure Goes to Root of Fair Trial Under NDPS Act : Calcutta High Court Tender Years Doctrine Is No Longer Good Law: Delhi High Court Slams Mother’s Custody Claim Built on Parental Alienation Negation of Bail is the Rule in NDPS Cases Involving Commercial Quantity: Himachal Pradesh High Court Denies Bail Single Stab Injury in Heat of Passion During Sudden Quarrel Is Not Murder: Kerala High Court Section 10 CPC Inapplicable To Labour Court Proceedings; Stay Of Individual Disputes Denied: Karnataka High Court 138 NI Act | Once Issuance and Signature on Cheque Are Admitted, Burden Shifts on Accused to Dislodge Statutory Presumption: Madras High Court Confession Cannot Substitute Proof: Bombay High Court Acquits Husband Convicted of Wife’s Murder "Sole Eyewitness Testimony, Corroborated by Medical and Recovery Evidence, Is Enough to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC: Allahabad High Court Partition Once Effected Cannot Be Reopened on Vague Allegations of Fraud: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Registered Family Partition Deed Cancellation of Land Acquisition Compensation Without Allegation or Hearing Is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Restores Compensation to Innocent Land Owner Whether Act Was in Discharge of Official Duty Is a Question of Fact — Magistrate, Not High Court, Must Decide: Supreme Court Restricts Writ Interference in BNSS Cases Section 175(4) BNSS | Affidavit Is Not Optional — Even Complaints Against Public Servants Must Follow Procedural Rigour: Supreme Court Magistrate Cannot Be Directed to Recall His Judicial Order by a Writ Court: Supreme Court Warns Against Article 226 Interference in Pending Criminal Proceedings Even In Absence of Written Demand, If Substantial Dispute Exists or Is Apprehended, Reference Under Section 10 ID Act Is Valid: Supreme Court Absence of Classical Signs of Strangulation and Possibility of Hanging Nullifies Homicidal Theory: Supreme Court Holds Medical Evidence Alone Cannot Prove Guilt Confession Must Be Direct Acknowledgment of Guilt, Not Mere Presence at Scene: Supreme Court Slams Misuse of Section 164 CrPC Reversal of Acquittal Without Dislodging Trial Court’s Reasoning Is Impermissible: Supreme Court Restores Acquittal

“Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order, Grants Bail to Retired Police Officer Pradeep Rameshwar Sharma: ‘No Purpose in Continuing the Appellant in Custody’”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, August 23, 2023: In a significant ruling today, the Supreme Court of India set aside the orders of the Special Court and the High Court, granting bail to retired police officer Pradeep Rameshwar Sharma. The judgment was delivered by Justice A.S. Bopanna and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha.

Sharma was accused of various offenses, including conspiracy and murder, under Sections 120B, 201, 302, 364, and 403 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Section 25 of the Arms Act, and Sections 16, 18, and 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 2004 (UAPA).

In its observation, the Supreme Court noted, “there would be no purpose in continuing the appellant in custody,” emphasizing that the charge sheet filed by the National Investigating Agency (NIA) didn’t strongly link Sharma to the alleged conspiracy of planting gelatin sticks in a vehicle. The court also took into consideration that the appellant had already been in custody since June 17, 2021, and that all the witnesses were yet to be examined.

Justice A.S. Bopanna stated in the judgment that “the fact that he was a police officer and has retired after rendering 37 years of service is a factor which should weigh in favor of the appellant as he has strong roots in Mumbai and would be available to stand trial.”

The apex court directed that Sharma should be released on bail subject to conditions imposed by the trial court.

Date of Decision: August 23, 2023

Pradeep Rameshwar Sharma  vs National Investigating Agency & Anr. 

Latest Legal News