Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Decision on Land Acquisition Lapse

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, April 11, 2023: In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the decision of the High Court regarding the lapse of land acquisition proceedings. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar.

The appeals before the Supreme Court involved the Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (HSIIDC) and others as appellants and M/s Honeywell International (India) Pvt. Ltd. as the respondent. The High Court had declared that the acquisition proceedings had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

The Supreme Court divided the appeals into two categories. In the first category, where the original writ petitioners had challenged the acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and sought a declaration of lapse under Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013, the High Court's decision was solely based on a previous case. The Supreme Court ruled that the High Court's decision in these cases was unsustainable, citing another judgment by the Constitution Bench.

In the second category of appeals, where only a declaration of lapse was sought, the Supreme Court also set aside the High Court's judgments. The Court further remanded both categories of appeals back to the High Court for fresh consideration of the writ petitions on their merits, excluding the issue of the applicability of Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013.

The Supreme Court emphasized the need for an early disposal of the cases and requested the High Court to decide them within a period of nine months.

This judgment brings clarity to the issue of land acquisition lapse and provides guidance for the future interpretation of relevant laws. The decision will have a significant impact on land acquisition cases and related disputes throughout the country.

The referred cases in this judgment include Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal & Others Etc., (2020) 8 SCC 129, and Pune Municipal Corporation v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki, (2014) 3 SCC 183.

D.D-11.Apr.2023

Haryana State Industrial  And Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.  vs M/s Honeywell International (India) Pvt. Ltd.             

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/11-Apr-2023-Haryana-State-Industrial-Vs-Honeywell-Rep.pdf"]

Latest Legal News