Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Entire Election Process in Ladakh, Warns Against Misuse of Authority in Electoral Matters

04 September 2024 11:29 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the entire election process initiated by the Administration of Union Territory of Ladakh. The Court also declared Jammu and Kashmir National Conference entitled to the exclusive allotment of the Plough symbol for the upcoming elections.

"Court Declares Jammu and Kashmir National Conference Entitled to Exclusive Allotment of the Plough Symbol, Cautions Authorities on 'Misconceived Notion' of Non-Interference"

Apex Court took a stern view against the misuse of authority in electoral matters. "This case constrains the Court to take note of the broader aspect of the lurking danger of authorities concerned using their powers relating to elections arbitrarily," the judgment read. The Court further warned that such conduct may compel it to reconsider its self-imposed restrictions on interfering in elections, stating that the notion that courts would not interfere is "just that – misconceived." [Para 39]

Supreme Court also emphasized the importance of election symbols, especially for political parties. "The serious consequence was that R1’s identity as a political party was eclipsed, right before the election to the LAHDC, where it was the incumbent party in power," the judgment noted. [Para 41-43]

Supreme Court held the Appellants responsible for the current situation due to their non-compliance with the High Court's orders. "The stark factor which stares us in the face is that well before and well in time, by way of the writ petition, R1 had approached the Court of first instance (the learned Single Judge), for the reliefs, which have been found due to them ultimately, and upheld by the Appellate Court (the learned Division Bench)," the Court observed. [Para 38]

The Court has mandated the issuance of a fresh Notification for elections to constitute the 5th Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council, Kargil. The appeal was dismissed with costs of Rs. 1,00,000 to be deposited in the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Welfare Fund. [Para 44, 45]

The Court also disposed of a pending Writ Petition and stated that another case survives and should be proceeded with expeditiously. [Para 46]

The judgment has been hailed as a significant step in ensuring fair electoral practices and holding authorities accountable for their actions.

Date of Decision: 06 SEPTEMBER, 2023 

UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH & ORS. vs JAMMU AND KASHMIR NATIONAL CONFERENCE & ANR.

Latest Legal News