MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Sets Aside Entire Election Process in Ladakh, Warns Against Misuse of Authority in Electoral Matters

04 September 2024 11:29 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the entire election process initiated by the Administration of Union Territory of Ladakh. The Court also declared Jammu and Kashmir National Conference entitled to the exclusive allotment of the Plough symbol for the upcoming elections.

"Court Declares Jammu and Kashmir National Conference Entitled to Exclusive Allotment of the Plough Symbol, Cautions Authorities on 'Misconceived Notion' of Non-Interference"

Apex Court took a stern view against the misuse of authority in electoral matters. "This case constrains the Court to take note of the broader aspect of the lurking danger of authorities concerned using their powers relating to elections arbitrarily," the judgment read. The Court further warned that such conduct may compel it to reconsider its self-imposed restrictions on interfering in elections, stating that the notion that courts would not interfere is "just that – misconceived." [Para 39]

Supreme Court also emphasized the importance of election symbols, especially for political parties. "The serious consequence was that R1’s identity as a political party was eclipsed, right before the election to the LAHDC, where it was the incumbent party in power," the judgment noted. [Para 41-43]

Supreme Court held the Appellants responsible for the current situation due to their non-compliance with the High Court's orders. "The stark factor which stares us in the face is that well before and well in time, by way of the writ petition, R1 had approached the Court of first instance (the learned Single Judge), for the reliefs, which have been found due to them ultimately, and upheld by the Appellate Court (the learned Division Bench)," the Court observed. [Para 38]

The Court has mandated the issuance of a fresh Notification for elections to constitute the 5th Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council, Kargil. The appeal was dismissed with costs of Rs. 1,00,000 to be deposited in the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Welfare Fund. [Para 44, 45]

The Court also disposed of a pending Writ Petition and stated that another case survives and should be proceeded with expeditiously. [Para 46]

The judgment has been hailed as a significant step in ensuring fair electoral practices and holding authorities accountable for their actions.

Date of Decision: 06 SEPTEMBER, 2023 

UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH & ORS. vs JAMMU AND KASHMIR NATIONAL CONFERENCE & ANR.

Latest Legal News