Motor Insurance Policy Covers Cross-Border Travel If Specifically Authorized By Valid Permit Under MVA: Supreme Court Petrol Pumps Act As 'Commission Agents' For Mahanagar Gas, Liable To Pay Service Tax Under Business Auxiliary Service: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Dilute 'Bangalore Water Supply' Ratio, Affirms Worker Protection Remains The Core Of Industrial Disputes Act Order XXII Rule 9(3) CPC | Application Under Section 5 Limitation Act Must Be Filed Separately To Condonate Delay In Setting Aside Abatement: Supreme Court Principle Of Parity | Supreme Court Extends Benefit Of Fixed-Term Sentence To Co-Accused Based On Remission Period Right To Catch Fish Amounts To 'Profit à Prendre' And Is Compulsorily Registrable As A Lease Under Section 17(1)(d) Registration Act: Supreme Court Supreme Court Mandates Adoption Of Guidelines To Inculcate Sensitivity And Compassion In Judicial Processes For Sexual Offences 'Last Seen' Circumstance Is Weak Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused PSEB | Pre-Regularization Service Must Be Counted As Qualifying Service For Pensionary Benefits: Supreme Court Writ Of Quo Warranto Cannot Be Used For Redress Of Personal Grievances By Unsuccessful Candidates In Selection Process: Supreme Court 'Case Of No Investigation': Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Citing 'Shoddy' Police Work And Lack Of Forensic Evidence 'Status Quo Cannot Be Vacated Without Appropriate Security': Supreme Court Directs Additional ₹200 Crores Deposit In RAKIA-Matrix Case SARFAESI Act | 'Bank' As Assignee Can Invoke Recovery Measures Even If Debt Was Originally Created By Non-Notified Financial Institution: Supreme Court 'CBI Failed Miserably': Supreme Court Tears Into 'Fabricated' Case, Acquits Bank Manager In 35-Year-Old Corruption Trial Mere Delay In Tax Deposit Cannot Be Equated With Non-Payment: Supreme Court Quashes Penalty On Saudi Arabian Airlines Revisional Power Under Section 56 Karnataka Land Revenue Act Cannot Be Invoked Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period: Supreme Court Prosecution Can’t Use Known Locations To Create 'Discovery' Fiction: Supreme Court Rejects Site Plan As Evidence Irretrievable Breakdown Of Marriage And Long-Term Separation Constitute Valid Grounds For Divorce Under Section 13(1)(ib) HMA: Supreme Court 'Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Is A Guideline And Not A Fetish': Supreme Court Acquits Man In 2007 Murder Case Over Fragile Circumstantial Evidence Plea Of Juvenility Is A Jurisdictional Fact; High Court Must Recall Final Judgments Under Section 482 CrPC To Remedy Miscarriage Of Justice: Supreme Court SEBI | Professional Clearing Members Have No Statutory Obligation To Verify Credit/Debit Positions Of Individual Clients Of Trading Members: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Entire Election Process in Ladakh, Warns Against Misuse of Authority in Electoral Matters

04 September 2024 11:29 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the entire election process initiated by the Administration of Union Territory of Ladakh. The Court also declared Jammu and Kashmir National Conference entitled to the exclusive allotment of the Plough symbol for the upcoming elections.

"Court Declares Jammu and Kashmir National Conference Entitled to Exclusive Allotment of the Plough Symbol, Cautions Authorities on 'Misconceived Notion' of Non-Interference"

Apex Court took a stern view against the misuse of authority in electoral matters. "This case constrains the Court to take note of the broader aspect of the lurking danger of authorities concerned using their powers relating to elections arbitrarily," the judgment read. The Court further warned that such conduct may compel it to reconsider its self-imposed restrictions on interfering in elections, stating that the notion that courts would not interfere is "just that – misconceived." [Para 39]

Supreme Court also emphasized the importance of election symbols, especially for political parties. "The serious consequence was that R1’s identity as a political party was eclipsed, right before the election to the LAHDC, where it was the incumbent party in power," the judgment noted. [Para 41-43]

Supreme Court held the Appellants responsible for the current situation due to their non-compliance with the High Court's orders. "The stark factor which stares us in the face is that well before and well in time, by way of the writ petition, R1 had approached the Court of first instance (the learned Single Judge), for the reliefs, which have been found due to them ultimately, and upheld by the Appellate Court (the learned Division Bench)," the Court observed. [Para 38]

The Court has mandated the issuance of a fresh Notification for elections to constitute the 5th Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council, Kargil. The appeal was dismissed with costs of Rs. 1,00,000 to be deposited in the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Welfare Fund. [Para 44, 45]

The Court also disposed of a pending Writ Petition and stated that another case survives and should be proceeded with expeditiously. [Para 46]

The judgment has been hailed as a significant step in ensuring fair electoral practices and holding authorities accountable for their actions.

Date of Decision: 06 SEPTEMBER, 2023 

UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH & ORS. vs JAMMU AND KASHMIR NATIONAL CONFERENCE & ANR.

Latest Legal News