Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail, Cites 'Error of Law' and 'Inadequate Reasoning'

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgement, setting aside the bail granted to the respondents-accused in Criminal Appeal No. 2078 of 2023. The two-judge bench comprising Hon'ble Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra ruled that the High Court had erred in granting bail to the accused without adequate reasoning, which amounted to a "vice of non-application of mind."

The judgement, delivered on 24th July 2023, emphasized the importance of considering material aspects of the case while granting bail. The apex court highlighted that though detailed discussions on the merits of the case were not required during bail applications, the court must record adequate reasons to validate the grant of bail.

The bench stated, "While not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the prosecution has brought on record adequate material that would prima-facie point towards the guilt of the accused." The Court also underscored the need for balancing an individual's liberty with the seriousness of the allegations against them.

The impugned orders passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur on 14th February 2022 and 02nd February 2023 were criticized for being cryptic and casual in granting bail to the respondents-accused. The Court pointed out that the High Court did not consider vital aspects of the case, including the specific roles attributed to each accused in the alleged crime.

"The High Court referred only to the testimony of one hostile witness, and on that basis, exercised its discretion to grant bail in an erroneous manner," the judgement quoted. Consequently, the Supreme Court found the bail orders lacking adequate reasoning and set them aside.

In conclusion, the Court canceled the bail bonds of the respondents-accused and directed them to surrender before the concerned jail authorities within two weeks from the date of the judgement.

This ruling serves as a reminder to lower courts to exercise their discretion judiciously while granting bail and to ensure that bail orders are backed by adequate reasoning based on material aspects of the case.

Date of Decision: 24th July 2023

ROHIT BISHNOI vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.   

Similar News