Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail, Cites 'Error of Law' and 'Inadequate Reasoning'

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgement, setting aside the bail granted to the respondents-accused in Criminal Appeal No. 2078 of 2023. The two-judge bench comprising Hon'ble Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra ruled that the High Court had erred in granting bail to the accused without adequate reasoning, which amounted to a "vice of non-application of mind."

The judgement, delivered on 24th July 2023, emphasized the importance of considering material aspects of the case while granting bail. The apex court highlighted that though detailed discussions on the merits of the case were not required during bail applications, the court must record adequate reasons to validate the grant of bail.

The bench stated, "While not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the prosecution has brought on record adequate material that would prima-facie point towards the guilt of the accused." The Court also underscored the need for balancing an individual's liberty with the seriousness of the allegations against them.

The impugned orders passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur on 14th February 2022 and 02nd February 2023 were criticized for being cryptic and casual in granting bail to the respondents-accused. The Court pointed out that the High Court did not consider vital aspects of the case, including the specific roles attributed to each accused in the alleged crime.

"The High Court referred only to the testimony of one hostile witness, and on that basis, exercised its discretion to grant bail in an erroneous manner," the judgement quoted. Consequently, the Supreme Court found the bail orders lacking adequate reasoning and set them aside.

In conclusion, the Court canceled the bail bonds of the respondents-accused and directed them to surrender before the concerned jail authorities within two weeks from the date of the judgement.

This ruling serves as a reminder to lower courts to exercise their discretion judiciously while granting bail and to ensure that bail orders are backed by adequate reasoning based on material aspects of the case.

Date of Decision: 24th July 2023

ROHIT BISHNOI vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.   

Similar News