Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Supreme Court Rules Non-Production of Power of Attorney Not Fatal to Validity of Sale Deed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has clarified that the non-production of a power of attorney in a suit is not fatal to the validity of a sale deed executed through a power of attorney. The court emphasized that the production of the original power of attorney is not an indispensable requirement to establish the validity of the execution of a sale deed.

The case, titled Dhirendra Chandra Saha and Another v. Sarat Chandra Majumdar and Others, involved the validity of a sale deed executed by the plaintiff, Dhirendra Chandra Saha, through a power of attorney. The defendants had challenged the sale deed, arguing that the power of attorney was not produced in the suit and therefore the execution of the sale deed was invalid.

Justice B.V. Nagarathna, delivering the judgment on 13th January 2023, observed that the registration of a document is a solemn act and the recitals of a registered document are presumed to be valid unless strong evidence is presented to the contrary. The court held that the statutory presumption of validity under Section 60 of the Registration Act could be invoked when all the requirements of executing a sale deed are complied with.

Furthermore, the court referred to Section 32(c) of the Registration Act, which authorizes the agent of a person, representative, or assignee to present a document for registration. It noted that the person executing the document, in this case, the power of attorney holder, does not require a power of attorney to present the document. The court clarified that the power of attorney holder need not produce the original document conferring power of attorney before the Sub-Registrar at the time of registration.

The court cited the case of Amar Nath v. Gian Chand and Another, wherein it was held that a sale deed executed through a power of attorney would not be liable to be disturbed solely on the ground that the power of attorney was not produced before the Sub-Registrar.

In this case, the defendants failed to produce any evidence to rebut the presumption of validity of the sale deed executed through the power of attorney. The court noted that the defendants had accepted the findings of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court, which concluded that they had no title over the suit land. The original owner of the property also did not dispute the execution of the power of attorney.

Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the High Court, which decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff. The court held that the non-production of the power of attorney in the suit was not fatal to the case of the plaintiff, and the sale deed executed through the power of attorney was valid.

Date of Decision: 13th January, 2023

Manik Majumder and Others   VS Dipak Kumar Saha (Dead) through Lrs. & Others 

Latest Legal News