Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Rules Non-Production of Power of Attorney Not Fatal to Validity of Sale Deed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has clarified that the non-production of a power of attorney in a suit is not fatal to the validity of a sale deed executed through a power of attorney. The court emphasized that the production of the original power of attorney is not an indispensable requirement to establish the validity of the execution of a sale deed.

The case, titled Dhirendra Chandra Saha and Another v. Sarat Chandra Majumdar and Others, involved the validity of a sale deed executed by the plaintiff, Dhirendra Chandra Saha, through a power of attorney. The defendants had challenged the sale deed, arguing that the power of attorney was not produced in the suit and therefore the execution of the sale deed was invalid.

Justice B.V. Nagarathna, delivering the judgment on 13th January 2023, observed that the registration of a document is a solemn act and the recitals of a registered document are presumed to be valid unless strong evidence is presented to the contrary. The court held that the statutory presumption of validity under Section 60 of the Registration Act could be invoked when all the requirements of executing a sale deed are complied with.

Furthermore, the court referred to Section 32(c) of the Registration Act, which authorizes the agent of a person, representative, or assignee to present a document for registration. It noted that the person executing the document, in this case, the power of attorney holder, does not require a power of attorney to present the document. The court clarified that the power of attorney holder need not produce the original document conferring power of attorney before the Sub-Registrar at the time of registration.

The court cited the case of Amar Nath v. Gian Chand and Another, wherein it was held that a sale deed executed through a power of attorney would not be liable to be disturbed solely on the ground that the power of attorney was not produced before the Sub-Registrar.

In this case, the defendants failed to produce any evidence to rebut the presumption of validity of the sale deed executed through the power of attorney. The court noted that the defendants had accepted the findings of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court, which concluded that they had no title over the suit land. The original owner of the property also did not dispute the execution of the power of attorney.

Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the High Court, which decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff. The court held that the non-production of the power of attorney in the suit was not fatal to the case of the plaintiff, and the sale deed executed through the power of attorney was valid.

Date of Decision: 13th January, 2023

Manik Majumder and Others   VS Dipak Kumar Saha (Dead) through Lrs. & Others 

Latest Legal News