Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Supreme Court Rules Non-Production of Power of Attorney Not Fatal to Validity of Sale Deed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has clarified that the non-production of a power of attorney in a suit is not fatal to the validity of a sale deed executed through a power of attorney. The court emphasized that the production of the original power of attorney is not an indispensable requirement to establish the validity of the execution of a sale deed.

The case, titled Dhirendra Chandra Saha and Another v. Sarat Chandra Majumdar and Others, involved the validity of a sale deed executed by the plaintiff, Dhirendra Chandra Saha, through a power of attorney. The defendants had challenged the sale deed, arguing that the power of attorney was not produced in the suit and therefore the execution of the sale deed was invalid.

Justice B.V. Nagarathna, delivering the judgment on 13th January 2023, observed that the registration of a document is a solemn act and the recitals of a registered document are presumed to be valid unless strong evidence is presented to the contrary. The court held that the statutory presumption of validity under Section 60 of the Registration Act could be invoked when all the requirements of executing a sale deed are complied with.

Furthermore, the court referred to Section 32(c) of the Registration Act, which authorizes the agent of a person, representative, or assignee to present a document for registration. It noted that the person executing the document, in this case, the power of attorney holder, does not require a power of attorney to present the document. The court clarified that the power of attorney holder need not produce the original document conferring power of attorney before the Sub-Registrar at the time of registration.

The court cited the case of Amar Nath v. Gian Chand and Another, wherein it was held that a sale deed executed through a power of attorney would not be liable to be disturbed solely on the ground that the power of attorney was not produced before the Sub-Registrar.

In this case, the defendants failed to produce any evidence to rebut the presumption of validity of the sale deed executed through the power of attorney. The court noted that the defendants had accepted the findings of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court, which concluded that they had no title over the suit land. The original owner of the property also did not dispute the execution of the power of attorney.

Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the High Court, which decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff. The court held that the non-production of the power of attorney in the suit was not fatal to the case of the plaintiff, and the sale deed executed through the power of attorney was valid.

Date of Decision: 13th January, 2023

Manik Majumder and Others   VS Dipak Kumar Saha (Dead) through Lrs. & Others 

Latest Legal News