-
by Admin
07 May 2024 2:49 AM
In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of India revived a writ petition that had been withdrawn by the petitioner before the Delhi High Court. The case, titled “SABERA KHATOON v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.,” brought attention to the petitioner’s concerns about the procedure followed in her detention and the availability of medical facilities. The Supreme Court’s bench, comprising HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA, and HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA, emphasized the differentiated issues raised by the petitioner and set aside the High Court’s withdrawal order.
The Supreme Court’s observation highlighted the petitioner’s stance that her case was distinct from the one referenced in her withdrawal application. The petitioner invoked Articles 14, 19(1)(e), and 21 of the Constitution of India. Notably, the Supreme Court acknowledged the petitioner’s concerns regarding the procedure of her detention and the medical care provided to her, indicating the importance of addressing such issues individually.
The court directed that the petitioner receive essential medical treatment based on the advice of the G B Pant Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital. The judgment underscored the need to consider differentiated aspects of the case and provided the petitioner the liberty to seek interim directions before the Delhi High Court.
This decision reiterates the significance of distinguishing between distinct issues, ensuring proper medical care, and allowing due legal recourse. The court’s action serves as a reminder that individual concerns must be addressed within the framework of justice and constitutional rights.
Date of Decision: 21-08-2023
SABERA KHATOON vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
