Rigours of UAPA Melt Before Article 21: Jharkhand High Court Grants Bail After Six Years of Incarceration Accused Cannot Challenge in Arguments What He Never Challenged in Cross-Examination: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction Counterblast Plea, Civil Dispute Defence No Shield When Cognizable Offence Is Disclosed: Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Ex-Driver Accused Of Outraging Modesty Lawyers Who Burned a Colleague's Furniture for Defending Toll Workers Have Tainted a Noble Profession: Supreme Court A Suspicious Dying Declaration Cannot Hang a Man: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Murder Conviction IQ of 65, Memory Loss, Frontal Lobe Damage: Supreme Court Holds Brain-Injured Manager Suffered 100% Functional Disability, Enhances Compensation to ₹97.73 Lakh Cannot Be Forced to Pay Gratuity to Retired Employees Who Refuse to Vacate Company Quarters: Supreme Court Victim Who Incited Riot Inside Court Cannot Blame Accused for Trial Delay: Supreme Court Grants Bail in Section 307 Case You Cannot Sell What You Don’t Own: ‘Vendor’s Half Share Means Buyer Gets Only Half’ : Andhra Pradesh High Court Nagaland's Oil Laws Face Constitutional Challenge: Gauhati High Court Sends Union-State Dispute to Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 3 CPC | Will's Validity Cannot Be Decided in Substitution Proceedings: Himachal Pradesh High Court 6-Year-Old Loses Arm To Live 11kV Wire Passing 'Almost Touching' Her Balcony: Punjab & Haryana High Court Awards Rs. 99.93 Lakh To Child Despite Nigam Blaming Father For 'Extending Balcony' Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 To Quash Rape & POCSO Conviction After Marriage Between Accused And Victim NGT Cannot Order Demolition of Temple On Ground of Encroachment of Park: Supreme Court Quashes Removal Order For Want of Jurisdiction Hostile Witnesses & Doubtful Recovery Can Collapse Prosecution: J&K High Court Sets High Threshold for Criminal Proof Compassion Cannot Override the Clock: Karnataka HC Denies Job to Guardian Aunt Despite 2021 Rule Change” Second Marriage During Pendency of Divorce Appeal Is Void: Kerala High Court Appearing in Exam Does Not Cure Attendance Deficiency: MP High Court Upholds 'Year Down' Against BBA Student With Sub-30% Attendance Patna High Court Directs Bihar To Submit Detailed Rehabilitation Plan For Recovered Mental Health Patients, Expand Half-Way Homes Across State Rajasthan High Court Upholds Refusal to Drop Bharat Band Stone-Pelting Case

Supreme Court Refers Controversial NCT Ordinance to Constitution Bench, Questions Validity of Parliament's Power

04 September 2024 10:34 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, July 20, 2023: In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has referred the constitutional validity of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Ordinance 2023 [“NCT Ordinance”] to a Constitution Bench. The NCT Ordinance, which was promulgated by the President on May 19, 2023, has been a subject of contention and has raised concerns about the extent of legislative and executive powers vested in the National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD).

"The disposal of the writ petition requires this Court to answer a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution." - Chief Justice of India, Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud.

The Court has posed critical questions regarding the scope of Parliament's authority under Article 239-AA(7) of the Constitution, which grants the power to make laws affecting NCTD. The NCT Ordinance introduced Section 3A in the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act 1991 [“GNCTD Act”], thereby excluding Entry 41 of List II from GNCTD's legislative competence.

The judgment highlights that the NCT Ordinance has potentially abrogated the principles of governance for NCTD, raising concerns about the democratic will and accountability of the elected government to the public. The Court observed, "The triple chain of accountability requires the permanent executives to be responsible to the elected government, the elected government to be responsible to the legislature, and the legislature to be responsible to the public." The impact of the NCT Ordinance on these principles has become a focal point of the legal battle.

The Court also draws attention to the apparent conflict between Article 239-AA(7)(a) and (b) of the Constitution. While (a) specifies that laws must only give effect to or supplement the provisions of Article 239-AA, (b) denotes that such laws could alter the existing constitutional structure of governance for NCTD. This conflict raises concerns over the validity of Parliament's exercise of power under Article 239-AA(7).

Chief Justice of India, Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, leading the Bench, stated, "Neither the 2018 Constitution Bench judgment nor the 2023 Constitution Bench judgment has dealt with the interpretation of Article 239-AA(7). We are of the considered opinion that the disposal of the writ petition requires this Court to answer a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution."

The judgment comes after the protracted legal battle between the Union of India and the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi on the administration of NCTD. The Constitution Bench has been tasked with resolving the questions of law and deciding on the validity of the NCT Ordinance. The Court's ruling is eagerly awaited as it could have far-reaching implications on the governance structure and executive powers in the national capital.

As the case proceeds to the Constitution Bench, the nation watches closely to see how the apex court interprets the constitutional provisions and clarifies the extent of Parliament's power over the governance of Delhi.

Date of Decision: July 20, 2023

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi  vs Union of India & Ors.

Latest Legal News