Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Recognizes Equivalence of Diplomas for Art & Craft Teacher Recruitment in Haryana

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India has allowed the review petitions challenging the finding of non-equivalence of qualifications for the recruitment of Art & Craft Teachers in Haryana. The judgment, delivered by Justice Sanjay Kumar, highlights the recognition of the Diploma in Art & Craft from Kurukshetra University as an equivalent qualification to the Diploma in Art & Craft from the Haryana Industrial Training Department.

The review petitions were filed by a group of candidates who had obtained Diplomas in Art & Craft from Kurukshetra University and were aggrieved by the earlier finding of non-equivalence. The Government of Haryana, in a notable change of stance, expressed its willingness to accept the Diploma from Kurukshetra University as equivalent to the one offered by the Industrial Training Department.

The Supreme Court took into account the certification provided by Kurukshetra University, stating that a Standing Committee had examined the matter and recommended treating both courses as equivalent for all purposes. Consequently, the Court allowed the review petitions and directed the government to accommodate the candidates with Diplomas from Kurukshetra University who were included in the selection list.

To facilitate this accommodation, the government decided to convert 178 posts of TGT Art to the post of Art & Craft Teacher (Diminishing Cadre). This step was taken to ensure that the candidates with Diplomas from Kurukshetra University could be appointed without affecting the previous appointees or their seniority.

The Supreme Court emphasized that the appointments should be made strictly based on the merit ranking from the selection list dated 14.11.2021. The vacant posts notified under Advertisement No. 6/2006, excluding the converted posts, will be available for the new appointments. The process is expected to be completed within two months from the date of the judgment.

The Court also clarified that the government's decision to convert the posts should not be treated as a precedent for future cases. Additionally, there shall be no order as to costs in this matter.

This judgment brings relief to the review petitioners and others in a similar situation, as their Diplomas from Kurukshetra University are now recognized as equivalent qualifications. It also underscores the importance of ensuring fairness and equal opportunities in the recruitment process, enabling deserving candidates to be considered for the vacant positions.

Date of Decision: July 3, 2023

NEERAJ KUMAR & ANR. vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Latest Legal News