Accused Loses Right To Default Bail By Acquiescence If Extension Orders Are Challenged Only After Chargesheet Filing: Supreme Court AP High Court Orders Release Of Vehicle Seized For Mineral Transport Violations Upon Payment Of Penalty, Says Rules Don't Mandate Indefinite Detention Short Time Gap Between 'Last Seen' And Death Clinches Murder Conviction Against Fired Driver: Allahabad High Court Court Must Restore Possession To Dispossessed Party If Ex-Parte Decree Is Set Aside Even If Property Descriptions Differ: Andhra Pradesh High Court Management Cannot Deny Compassionate Appointment Citing Delay If It Failed To Maintain Service Records: Calcutta High Court Long Possession Alone Does Not Establish Tenancy; Burden Of Proof Lies On Person Claiming Status Of Tenant: Bombay High Court Consent Of Minor Immaterial: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction But Acquits Man Of Kidnapping Charges Notional Income Of Minor In Motor Accident Claims Must Be Based On Minimum Wages Of Skilled Workmen: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹56.8 Lakhs Revenue Records Serve Only Fiscal Purpose, Cannot Be Treated As Proof Of Title To Property: Supreme Court Executing Court Cannot Grant 'Deemed Extension' Of Time For Deposit In Specific Performance Decree: Supreme Court Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable If Balance Sale Consideration Not Deposited Within Stipulated Time: Supreme Court Supreme Court Protects MSMEs From Closure Over Missing Environmental Clearance If Pollution Boards Were Unaware Of Requirement Industrial Units Operating With Valid PCB Consents Can't Be Closed Merely For Technical Want Of Prior Environmental Clearance: Supreme Court Punishment On Charge Not Framed In Show Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Supreme Court Reduces Doctor's Penalty To Censure Plea Of Acquiescence Cannot Defeat Lawful Title Claim When Encroachment Is Established: Madras High Court Board Of Revenue Can't Quash Unchallenged Orders While Exercising Revisional Jurisdiction: Orissa High Court Penetration To Any Extent Sufficient For Offence Under POCSO Act; Intact Hymen No Bar For Conviction: Meghalaya High Court Expeditious Conclusion Of Summary Force Court Trial Not Arbitrary If Procedure Followed; ITBPF Act Self-Contained: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Doesn't Bar Appeal Filed Prior To Withdrawal Of Earlier Defective Appeal Against Same Order: Madhya Pradesh High Court Appointment Of Receiver Is An 'Extreme Remedy', Cannot Be Ordered Lightly Especially After Decades Of Inaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Recognizes Equivalence of Diplomas for Art & Craft Teacher Recruitment in Haryana

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India has allowed the review petitions challenging the finding of non-equivalence of qualifications for the recruitment of Art & Craft Teachers in Haryana. The judgment, delivered by Justice Sanjay Kumar, highlights the recognition of the Diploma in Art & Craft from Kurukshetra University as an equivalent qualification to the Diploma in Art & Craft from the Haryana Industrial Training Department.

The review petitions were filed by a group of candidates who had obtained Diplomas in Art & Craft from Kurukshetra University and were aggrieved by the earlier finding of non-equivalence. The Government of Haryana, in a notable change of stance, expressed its willingness to accept the Diploma from Kurukshetra University as equivalent to the one offered by the Industrial Training Department.

The Supreme Court took into account the certification provided by Kurukshetra University, stating that a Standing Committee had examined the matter and recommended treating both courses as equivalent for all purposes. Consequently, the Court allowed the review petitions and directed the government to accommodate the candidates with Diplomas from Kurukshetra University who were included in the selection list.

To facilitate this accommodation, the government decided to convert 178 posts of TGT Art to the post of Art & Craft Teacher (Diminishing Cadre). This step was taken to ensure that the candidates with Diplomas from Kurukshetra University could be appointed without affecting the previous appointees or their seniority.

The Supreme Court emphasized that the appointments should be made strictly based on the merit ranking from the selection list dated 14.11.2021. The vacant posts notified under Advertisement No. 6/2006, excluding the converted posts, will be available for the new appointments. The process is expected to be completed within two months from the date of the judgment.

The Court also clarified that the government's decision to convert the posts should not be treated as a precedent for future cases. Additionally, there shall be no order as to costs in this matter.

This judgment brings relief to the review petitioners and others in a similar situation, as their Diplomas from Kurukshetra University are now recognized as equivalent qualifications. It also underscores the importance of ensuring fairness and equal opportunities in the recruitment process, enabling deserving candidates to be considered for the vacant positions.

Date of Decision: July 3, 2023

NEERAJ KUMAR & ANR. vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Latest Legal News