Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Recognizes Equivalence of Diplomas for Art & Craft Teacher Recruitment in Haryana

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India has allowed the review petitions challenging the finding of non-equivalence of qualifications for the recruitment of Art & Craft Teachers in Haryana. The judgment, delivered by Justice Sanjay Kumar, highlights the recognition of the Diploma in Art & Craft from Kurukshetra University as an equivalent qualification to the Diploma in Art & Craft from the Haryana Industrial Training Department.

The review petitions were filed by a group of candidates who had obtained Diplomas in Art & Craft from Kurukshetra University and were aggrieved by the earlier finding of non-equivalence. The Government of Haryana, in a notable change of stance, expressed its willingness to accept the Diploma from Kurukshetra University as equivalent to the one offered by the Industrial Training Department.

The Supreme Court took into account the certification provided by Kurukshetra University, stating that a Standing Committee had examined the matter and recommended treating both courses as equivalent for all purposes. Consequently, the Court allowed the review petitions and directed the government to accommodate the candidates with Diplomas from Kurukshetra University who were included in the selection list.

To facilitate this accommodation, the government decided to convert 178 posts of TGT Art to the post of Art & Craft Teacher (Diminishing Cadre). This step was taken to ensure that the candidates with Diplomas from Kurukshetra University could be appointed without affecting the previous appointees or their seniority.

The Supreme Court emphasized that the appointments should be made strictly based on the merit ranking from the selection list dated 14.11.2021. The vacant posts notified under Advertisement No. 6/2006, excluding the converted posts, will be available for the new appointments. The process is expected to be completed within two months from the date of the judgment.

The Court also clarified that the government's decision to convert the posts should not be treated as a precedent for future cases. Additionally, there shall be no order as to costs in this matter.

This judgment brings relief to the review petitioners and others in a similar situation, as their Diplomas from Kurukshetra University are now recognized as equivalent qualifications. It also underscores the importance of ensuring fairness and equal opportunities in the recruitment process, enabling deserving candidates to be considered for the vacant positions.

Date of Decision: July 3, 2023

NEERAJ KUMAR & ANR. vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Latest Legal News