Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Supreme Court Recognizes Equivalence of Diplomas for Art & Craft Teacher Recruitment in Haryana

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India has allowed the review petitions challenging the finding of non-equivalence of qualifications for the recruitment of Art & Craft Teachers in Haryana. The judgment, delivered by Justice Sanjay Kumar, highlights the recognition of the Diploma in Art & Craft from Kurukshetra University as an equivalent qualification to the Diploma in Art & Craft from the Haryana Industrial Training Department.

The review petitions were filed by a group of candidates who had obtained Diplomas in Art & Craft from Kurukshetra University and were aggrieved by the earlier finding of non-equivalence. The Government of Haryana, in a notable change of stance, expressed its willingness to accept the Diploma from Kurukshetra University as equivalent to the one offered by the Industrial Training Department.

The Supreme Court took into account the certification provided by Kurukshetra University, stating that a Standing Committee had examined the matter and recommended treating both courses as equivalent for all purposes. Consequently, the Court allowed the review petitions and directed the government to accommodate the candidates with Diplomas from Kurukshetra University who were included in the selection list.

To facilitate this accommodation, the government decided to convert 178 posts of TGT Art to the post of Art & Craft Teacher (Diminishing Cadre). This step was taken to ensure that the candidates with Diplomas from Kurukshetra University could be appointed without affecting the previous appointees or their seniority.

The Supreme Court emphasized that the appointments should be made strictly based on the merit ranking from the selection list dated 14.11.2021. The vacant posts notified under Advertisement No. 6/2006, excluding the converted posts, will be available for the new appointments. The process is expected to be completed within two months from the date of the judgment.

The Court also clarified that the government's decision to convert the posts should not be treated as a precedent for future cases. Additionally, there shall be no order as to costs in this matter.

This judgment brings relief to the review petitioners and others in a similar situation, as their Diplomas from Kurukshetra University are now recognized as equivalent qualifications. It also underscores the importance of ensuring fairness and equal opportunities in the recruitment process, enabling deserving candidates to be considered for the vacant positions.

Date of Decision: July 3, 2023

NEERAJ KUMAR & ANR. vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Latest Legal News