Triple Riding On Motorcycle Not Automatic Proof Of Contributory Negligence; High Court Can Enhance Award Even Without Cross-Appeal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Statutory Power To Lay Electricity Lines Prevails Over Private Land Claims; Landowners Entitled To Compensation, Not Obstruction: Bombay High Court Beer & Whisky Are Allied/Cognate Goods; Use Of Identical Mark For Spirits Infringes 'Godfather' Beer Trademark: Delhi High Court Minimum Percentile Fixed By Indian Nursing Council For B.Sc. Nursing Admissions Must Be Strictly Adhered To; Cannot Be Diluted Without Approval: Calcutta High Court Bride Not Expected To Keep All Gold In Personal Custody In Matrimonial Home; Entrustment To Husband Presumed: Kerala High Court Default Imprisonment Not Additional Punishment But Coercive Measure To Secure Fine; Cannot Become 'De Facto' Debtors' Prison: Karnataka High Court Mahant Is Only A Custodian Of Deity’s Property, Assets Gifted For Temple Maintenance Belong To Public Trust: Gujarat High Court Pendency Of Criminal Antecedents Alone Not A Ground To Deny Bail: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail In Abduction Case After 3-Year Delay In FIR Beer Falls Under ‘IMFL’ Category; No Obligation To Collect TCS On Sales Prior To June 2003: Telangana High Court Dismissal From Service For Negligence Without Proved Misappropriation Is Disproportionate: Orissa High Court Merit In A Case Does Not Justify Disregarding Statutory Delay: NCDRC Upholds Dismissal Of Star Health's Appeal Filed With 442-Day Delay Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Arbitration Act Commences Only From Receipt Of Signed Copy Of Award: Madhya Pradesh High Court Government Employee Not Eligible For Regular Promotion During Pendency Of Vigilance Proceeding: Orissa High Court Arrest Warrants Against Directors Under Section 72 CP Act Should Be Last Resort; Proper Procedure Must Be Followed: NCDRC

Supreme Court Questions High Court's Reliance on Settlement for Offence Under Section 302 IPC – Bail Order Quashed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, August 22, 2023 – The Supreme Court of India today set aside a Gujarat High Court order granting bail to an accused in a murder case, questioning the High Court's reliance on a settlement reached between the accused and the original complainant. The apex court also criticized the State for failing to present any 'special circumstances' against the accused, despite his criminal antecedents.

In a decisive judgment, the Supreme Court highlighted the procedural irregularities in the High Court's approach, specifically regarding the decision to grant anticipatory bail based on a settlement for an offence falling under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, which pertains to murder. "The reliance on a settlement between the accused and the original complainant for an offence under Section 302 of the IPC was notably irregular," the judgment read. [Para 1-5]

The apex court also took issue with the lack of 'special circumstances' presented by the State against the accused. "It is alarming that no special circumstances against the respondent were presented by the State, despite his criminal antecedents," the Court observed. [Para 9]

The judgment also emphasized the importance of personal liberty and cautioned courts to ordinarily grant bail, especially in serious cases involving offences carrying long sentences. [Para 10]

Ultimately, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's 'casual approach' in granting anticipatory bail. The accused was directed to surrender before the Court for regular bail proceedings. All courts and police authorities have been directed to strictly follow the law laid down in Arnesh Kumar and the directions in this latest judgment within a specified time frame. [Para 13]

Date of Decision: 22nd August, 2023

BHARWAD SANTOSHBHAI SONDABHAI       vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

Latest Legal News