Sold Property During Pending Appeal, Defied Court Order: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sends Man To Jail For Contempt Hostile Witness Cannot Erase a Bribe Demand Already Made on Record: Supreme Court Restores Conviction of Ration Officer Three Decades of Unpaid Wages: Supreme Court Strips Gannon Dunkerley of Control Over Sick Company's Assets, Appoints Administrator to Pay Workers by August 2026 Gram Nyayalaya Cannot Touch Family Court's Maintenance Orders — Allahabad High Court Draws the Line Caste Abuse Allegation at Village Jatra Is Counter-Blast to Earlier Machete Attack: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Despite SC/ST Act Bar Contributory Negligence | Not Wearing a Helmet Does Not Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Madras High Court Air Force Can't Punish Officer After Criminal Court Sets Him Free: Supreme Court Overturns 30-Year-Old Dismissal Written Statement Without Affidavit of Admission/Denial: Non-Est Filing or Curable Defect? Delhi High Court Refers Conflicting Views to Larger Bench Bank's Negligence Killed Cheque Bounce Case Before It Could Begin: Supreme Court Rules Section 138 Remedy Lost Due to Stale Cheques Bank Letting Your Cheques Go Stale Is Deficiency in Service: Supreme Court Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Benefit Of Probation Act Available Even If Offender Is Sentenced Solely To Fine: Supreme Court Reporting Registration Of FIR Based On Public Records Does Not Violate Right To Privacy: Sikkim High Court CBSE Cannot Cancel Class XII Results Based on Similar MCQ Answers Alone Without Any Report of Malpractice From Examination Centre: Orissa High Court

Supreme Court Questions High Court's Reliance on Settlement for Offence Under Section 302 IPC – Bail Order Quashed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, August 22, 2023 – The Supreme Court of India today set aside a Gujarat High Court order granting bail to an accused in a murder case, questioning the High Court's reliance on a settlement reached between the accused and the original complainant. The apex court also criticized the State for failing to present any 'special circumstances' against the accused, despite his criminal antecedents.

In a decisive judgment, the Supreme Court highlighted the procedural irregularities in the High Court's approach, specifically regarding the decision to grant anticipatory bail based on a settlement for an offence falling under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, which pertains to murder. "The reliance on a settlement between the accused and the original complainant for an offence under Section 302 of the IPC was notably irregular," the judgment read. [Para 1-5]

The apex court also took issue with the lack of 'special circumstances' presented by the State against the accused. "It is alarming that no special circumstances against the respondent were presented by the State, despite his criminal antecedents," the Court observed. [Para 9]

The judgment also emphasized the importance of personal liberty and cautioned courts to ordinarily grant bail, especially in serious cases involving offences carrying long sentences. [Para 10]

Ultimately, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's 'casual approach' in granting anticipatory bail. The accused was directed to surrender before the Court for regular bail proceedings. All courts and police authorities have been directed to strictly follow the law laid down in Arnesh Kumar and the directions in this latest judgment within a specified time frame. [Para 13]

Date of Decision: 22nd August, 2023

BHARWAD SANTOSHBHAI SONDABHAI       vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

Latest Legal News