Lethargy Is Not an Exceptional Circumstance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Striking Off of Defence for Delay in Filing Written Statement Vague Decree of Injunction Can’t Be Executed by Attaching Machines: Rajasthan High Court Strikes Down Execution Order Mere permission to join proceedings without allowing filing of written statement is illusory: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Proceedings Unregistered Power of Attorney Can’t Transfer Property: MP High Court Denies Title, Dismisses Ejectment Suit Mere Non-Recovery of Weapon Is Not Fatal When Circumstantial and Medical Evidence Prove Guilt Beyond Doubt: Allahabad High Court Failure to Examine Gazetted Officer and Magistrate Who Certified Seizure Goes to Root of Fair Trial Under NDPS Act : Calcutta High Court Tender Years Doctrine Is No Longer Good Law: Delhi High Court Slams Mother’s Custody Claim Built on Parental Alienation Negation of Bail is the Rule in NDPS Cases Involving Commercial Quantity: Himachal Pradesh High Court Denies Bail Single Stab Injury in Heat of Passion During Sudden Quarrel Is Not Murder: Kerala High Court Section 10 CPC Inapplicable To Labour Court Proceedings; Stay Of Individual Disputes Denied: Karnataka High Court 138 NI Act | Once Issuance and Signature on Cheque Are Admitted, Burden Shifts on Accused to Dislodge Statutory Presumption: Madras High Court Confession Cannot Substitute Proof: Bombay High Court Acquits Husband Convicted of Wife’s Murder "Sole Eyewitness Testimony, Corroborated by Medical and Recovery Evidence, Is Enough to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC: Allahabad High Court Partition Once Effected Cannot Be Reopened on Vague Allegations of Fraud: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Registered Family Partition Deed Cancellation of Land Acquisition Compensation Without Allegation or Hearing Is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Restores Compensation to Innocent Land Owner Whether Act Was in Discharge of Official Duty Is a Question of Fact — Magistrate, Not High Court, Must Decide: Supreme Court Restricts Writ Interference in BNSS Cases Section 175(4) BNSS | Affidavit Is Not Optional — Even Complaints Against Public Servants Must Follow Procedural Rigour: Supreme Court Magistrate Cannot Be Directed to Recall His Judicial Order by a Writ Court: Supreme Court Warns Against Article 226 Interference in Pending Criminal Proceedings Even In Absence of Written Demand, If Substantial Dispute Exists or Is Apprehended, Reference Under Section 10 ID Act Is Valid: Supreme Court Absence of Classical Signs of Strangulation and Possibility of Hanging Nullifies Homicidal Theory: Supreme Court Holds Medical Evidence Alone Cannot Prove Guilt Confession Must Be Direct Acknowledgment of Guilt, Not Mere Presence at Scene: Supreme Court Slams Misuse of Section 164 CrPC Reversal of Acquittal Without Dislodging Trial Court’s Reasoning Is Impermissible: Supreme Court Restores Acquittal

Supreme Court Questions High Court's Reliance on Settlement for Offence Under Section 302 IPC – Bail Order Quashed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, August 22, 2023 – The Supreme Court of India today set aside a Gujarat High Court order granting bail to an accused in a murder case, questioning the High Court's reliance on a settlement reached between the accused and the original complainant. The apex court also criticized the State for failing to present any 'special circumstances' against the accused, despite his criminal antecedents.

In a decisive judgment, the Supreme Court highlighted the procedural irregularities in the High Court's approach, specifically regarding the decision to grant anticipatory bail based on a settlement for an offence falling under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, which pertains to murder. "The reliance on a settlement between the accused and the original complainant for an offence under Section 302 of the IPC was notably irregular," the judgment read. [Para 1-5]

The apex court also took issue with the lack of 'special circumstances' presented by the State against the accused. "It is alarming that no special circumstances against the respondent were presented by the State, despite his criminal antecedents," the Court observed. [Para 9]

The judgment also emphasized the importance of personal liberty and cautioned courts to ordinarily grant bail, especially in serious cases involving offences carrying long sentences. [Para 10]

Ultimately, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's 'casual approach' in granting anticipatory bail. The accused was directed to surrender before the Court for regular bail proceedings. All courts and police authorities have been directed to strictly follow the law laid down in Arnesh Kumar and the directions in this latest judgment within a specified time frame. [Para 13]

Date of Decision: 22nd August, 2023

BHARWAD SANTOSHBHAI SONDABHAI       vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

Latest Legal News