Rigours of UAPA Melt Before Article 21: Jharkhand High Court Grants Bail After Six Years of Incarceration Accused Cannot Challenge in Arguments What He Never Challenged in Cross-Examination: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction Counterblast Plea, Civil Dispute Defence No Shield When Cognizable Offence Is Disclosed: Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Ex-Driver Accused Of Outraging Modesty Lawyers Who Burned a Colleague's Furniture for Defending Toll Workers Have Tainted a Noble Profession: Supreme Court A Suspicious Dying Declaration Cannot Hang a Man: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Murder Conviction IQ of 65, Memory Loss, Frontal Lobe Damage: Supreme Court Holds Brain-Injured Manager Suffered 100% Functional Disability, Enhances Compensation to ₹97.73 Lakh Cannot Be Forced to Pay Gratuity to Retired Employees Who Refuse to Vacate Company Quarters: Supreme Court Victim Who Incited Riot Inside Court Cannot Blame Accused for Trial Delay: Supreme Court Grants Bail in Section 307 Case You Cannot Sell What You Don’t Own: ‘Vendor’s Half Share Means Buyer Gets Only Half’ : Andhra Pradesh High Court Nagaland's Oil Laws Face Constitutional Challenge: Gauhati High Court Sends Union-State Dispute to Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 3 CPC | Will's Validity Cannot Be Decided in Substitution Proceedings: Himachal Pradesh High Court 6-Year-Old Loses Arm To Live 11kV Wire Passing 'Almost Touching' Her Balcony: Punjab & Haryana High Court Awards Rs. 99.93 Lakh To Child Despite Nigam Blaming Father For 'Extending Balcony' Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 To Quash Rape & POCSO Conviction After Marriage Between Accused And Victim NGT Cannot Order Demolition of Temple On Ground of Encroachment of Park: Supreme Court Quashes Removal Order For Want of Jurisdiction Hostile Witnesses & Doubtful Recovery Can Collapse Prosecution: J&K High Court Sets High Threshold for Criminal Proof Compassion Cannot Override the Clock: Karnataka HC Denies Job to Guardian Aunt Despite 2021 Rule Change” Second Marriage During Pendency of Divorce Appeal Is Void: Kerala High Court Appearing in Exam Does Not Cure Attendance Deficiency: MP High Court Upholds 'Year Down' Against BBA Student With Sub-30% Attendance Patna High Court Directs Bihar To Submit Detailed Rehabilitation Plan For Recovered Mental Health Patients, Expand Half-Way Homes Across State Rajasthan High Court Upholds Refusal to Drop Bharat Band Stone-Pelting Case

Supreme Court Quashes Order on Deposit of Interim Compensation in Dishonored Cheque Case

04 September 2024 10:30 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has quashed an order directing the petitioner to deposit 10% of the amount of a dishonored cheque as interim compensation. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar, addressed the tenability of the trial court’s order under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The court held that the order was in violation of Section 143A(1) of the Act, which stipulates that interim compensation can only be granted when the accused pleads not guilty to the accusation in the complaint. The order in question was issued before the accused had entered a plea, thus infringing upon the statutory provision.

Quoting from the judgment, the bench stated, “As is evident from a plain reading of Section 143A(1)(a), it is only where the accused ‘pleads not guilty’ of the accusation made in the complaint that interim compensation under Section 143A(1) can be granted. In the present case, the Magistrate did not issue the order after the plea of the accused was entered, but before that i.e. after he answered the summons.”

The court emphasized that since the trial had reached an advanced stage, no further orders were made. However, it clarified that the complainant could seek appropriate relief, including under Section 143A, at any stage of the trial, thus upholding the complainant’s right to claim relief.

This judgment highlights the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and statutory provisions while granting interim compensation in dishonored cheque cases. It sets a precedent for future cases and provides clarity on the applicability of Section 143A at different stages of the trial.

The decision of the Supreme Court carries significant implications for the enforcement of the Negotiable Instruments Act and ensures fairness in the proceedings related to dishonored cheques.

Date of Decision: 7th July 2023

PAWAN BHASIN  vs STATE OF U.P. & ANR.

Latest Legal News