Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     Sudden Fight Without Premeditation Led to Fatal Injury, Not Murder: Supreme Court Reduces Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide    |     Andhra Pradesh High Court Holds Indefinite Suspension of Bar License Without Reason Violates Natural Justice Principles    |     Statements Recorded Under Section 108 of the Customs Act Do Not Warrant Pre-Arrest Bail: Kerala High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to Petitioners in Gold Smuggling Case    |     Muslim Law | Delay in Declaring Matrimonial Status Does Not Apply to Divorce Cases: Allahabad HC    |     Absence of Doctor's Certification on Victim's Mental Fitness Makes Dying Declaration Unreliable: Allahabad High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Death Case    |     Dying Declaration Can Sustain Conviction Even Without Doctor's Certificate of Fitness: Punjab & Haryana HC Upholds Conviction in Dowry Death Case    |     Mere Allegations of Harassment Do Not Constitute Cruelty Without Sufficient Evidence: Bombay High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Abetment of Suicide and Cruelty    |     Right to Hearing: Petitioners Must Be Heard Before Finalizing FTL of Durgam Cheruvu: Telangana High Court Directs No Demolition Until Decision    |     No Fresh Consent Needed Under Section 50 of NDPS Act Once Accused Elects Search Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate: Punjab and Haryana High Court    |     Suspicious Circumstances Around the 1993 Will: Wife Declared Dead While Alive: Calcutta HC Voids Probate    |     Extension of Sale Deed Deadline Prima Facie Binding, Time Not Essence of the Contract: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit    |     Law Does Not Compel the Impossible : High Court Invokes Doctrine of Impossibility in Pension Eligibility Case    |     Bar Council of India Mandates Criminal Background Checks, Biometric Attendance, and Strict Employment Declarations for Law Students    |     Service Law | Grant of Prosecution Sanction is Not Enough for Sealed Cover: SC Upholds DPC Findings in Favor of IRS Officer    |     Stamp Act | Agreements to Sell with Possession Clauses Are Conveyances and Must Be Stamped Separately: Supreme Court    |     Supreme Court Directs Immediate Implementation of Electronic Road Safety Monitoring Under Motor Vehicles Act    |     Supreme Court Stays Defamation Proceedings Against Shashi Tharoor, Issues Notice on "Person Aggrieved" Under Section 199 CrPC    |     Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention Violates Fundamental Right to Speedy Trial: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in Murder Conspiracy Case    |     Prosecution Failed to Prove Identity of the Exhumed Body: Supreme Court Acquits Police Officers in Custodial Death Case    |     Sacrosanct Duty of Husband to Financially Support Wife, Even if Able-Bodied and of Limited Means: Delhi HC Upholds Wife’s Maintenance    |     Delay in Filing FIR Undermines Credibility of Threat Allegations Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition for Bail Cancellation    |     False Claims Shake Court's Trust in Legal Proceedings: Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Premature Release After False Statements on Imprisonment Duration    |     Absence of Premeditation Leads to Reduction of Charge to Section 304 Part I IPC: Supreme Court Modifies Murder Conviction to Culpable Homicide    |     Executive Instructions Cannot Supplant Statutory Notifications: Bombay High Court Holds on Environmental Clearances    |    

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings U/S 498A IPC: Absence of Specific Allegations and Evidence Against Appellants

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India quashed the criminal proceedings against Mahalakshmi and others in a marital cruelty and dowry demands case, citing the “absence of specific allegations and evidence against appellants.” The bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and S.V.N. Bhatti highlighted the need for concrete evidence in cases involving marital disputes.

The appellants, Mahalakshmi, Maharani T.S., Ranjanavadhan, and Archana, were implicated in a case filed by Rekha Bhaskaran, under Sections 498A and 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The Supreme Court, in its judgment, observed that the allegations against the appellants were vague and lacked specific details that constitute cruelty under section 498A of the IPC.

Justice Khanna, while delivering the judgment, stated, “In the absence of any material evidence of interference and involvement in the marital life of the complainant, may not be sufficient to implicate the person as having committed cruelty under section 498A of the IPC.” This observation underlines the court’s stance on the necessity of substantive evidence in cases alleging marital cruelty.

The court also pointed out that appellant no. 1, Mahalakshmi, was not residing in India at the time of the alleged incidents, and the other appellants were living separately from the complainant’s marital home. This further weakened the prosecution’s case, leading to the quashing of the criminal proceedings.

The judgment also referenced several precedents, emphasizing the need for specific allegations and evidence in marital cruelty cases, such as Kahkashan Kausar @ Sonam and others v. State of Bihar and others, (2022) 6 SCC 599, and others.

While the proceedings against the appellants have been quashed, the court clarified that if any new material evidence comes to light during the recording of evidence, it would be open for the trial court to take action under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Date of Decision: 30th November 2023

MAHALAKSHMI & ORS. VS THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

Similar News