Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court

Supreme Court Overrules High Court Mandate on Power Purchase on High Rates, Upholds Consumer Interest in Electricity Contracts

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a noteable judgment, the Supreme Court of India has overruled a previous High Court mandate that directed state instrumentalities to purchase electricity from specific bidders, irrespective of the market alignment of their quoted rates. The apex court's decision reinforces the primacy of consumer interests and public welfare in commercial transactions involving state entities.

The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Prashant Kumar Mishra, revolved around the purchase of electricity by state distributors from private generators. The High Court had earlier mandated the purchase of power from the respondent, MB Power (Madhya Pradesh) Limited, which the Supreme Court found was not in alignment with prevailing market prices.

Justice Gavai, in his observation, emphasized the critical balance between consumer interest and generator benefits, stating, "It will not be permissible to take a lopsided view only to protect the interest of the generators ignoring the consumers’ interest and public interest." This statement underlines the judgment's focus on safeguarding consumer interests against potentially inflated electricity costs.

The Supreme Court's ruling highlighted the importance of a fair and transparent bidding process in determining power purchase agreements. The judgment noted that state entities, while having the autonomy to choose their commercial transactions, must adhere to the norms and procedures they have established and cannot deviate arbitrarily. The apex court clarified that judicial intervention is warranted only if the decision-making process is vitiated by arbitrariness, unreasonableness, or malafide intent.

The judgment is seen as a significant move in ensuring that power procurement by state entities is conducted in a manner that is both economically viable and in the best interest of consumers. It reiterates the judiciary's role in upholding the principles of fairness and reasonableness in state commercial activities, particularly in sectors as vital as power distribution.

Date of Decision: January 8, 2024

JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. VS MB POWER (MADHYA PRADESH) LIMITED  & ORS.

 

Latest Legal News