No Arbitration Agreement, No Arbitrator: Supreme Court Voids Award Made Without Municipal Council's Consent, Calls Entire Proceedings "Coram Non Judice" Post-Disposal Miscellaneous Applications Maintainable Only In Rare Situations; Court Becomes Functus Officio After SLP Dismissal: Supreme Court Vague & Omnibus Allegations Against Relatives In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Nipped In The Bud; 7-Year Delay In FIR Fatal: Supreme Court State Can Withdraw Electricity Duty Exemption For Captive Power Plants In Public Interest But Must Give One-Year Notice Period: Supreme Court DSC Personnel Entitled To Second Pension; Shortfall In Service Up To 12 Months Can Be Condoned: Supreme Court Person Professing Christianity Cannot Claim Scheduled Caste Status To Invoke SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Except Matters One May, But Exclude Justice One Cannot: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award, Holds State Cannot Be Judge In Its Own Cause On Disputed Breach When State Requisitions Your Vehicle For Elections And It Kills Someone, The State Pays — Not Your Insurer: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Financial Burden Cannot Defeat Constitutional Right to Just Compensation: Supreme Court Unsigned Charge Is A Curable Irregularity, Won't Vitiate Trial Unless 'Failure Of Justice' Is Shown: Supreme Court Tenant Files Fresh Petition Before Rent Authority After Supreme Court Dismisses SLP, Review And Misc Application — Court Calls It "Gross Abuse of Process", Voids Restoration Order Taxation Law | Exemption For Naphtha Depends On 'Intended Use' At Procurement, Not Actual Exclusive Use: Supreme Court Army's Own Grading System Worked Against Women Officers For Years — Supreme Court Grants Permanent Commission, Pension To Short Service Women Officers

Supreme Court Orders Recovery of Unjust Pay Scale Granted to CSTT Officer, Cites ‘Well-Planned and Deliberate Infraction’

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a decision, the Supreme Court of India has ordered the recovery of excess pay unjustly granted to a Central Scientific and Technical Terminology (CSTT) officer, setting a significant precedent in the application of equal pay for equal work principles. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices Hima Kohli and Rajesh Bindal, has quashed previous orders by the High Court and the Tribunal, which had upheld the disputed pay scale revision.

The case revolved around respondent No. 4, an Assistant Scientific Officer (Medicine) in CSTT, who was granted an upgraded pay scale from ₹6500-10500 to ₹8000-13500, despite not practicing as a doctor. This decision faced scrutiny as it was not in line with the duties being performed by the officer. Other appellants in the same cadre, performing similar roles, were denied this pay scale upgrade, leading to the appeal.

In their observation, the Supreme Court noted, “The grant of a higher pay scale solely by relying upon the recommendations made by the Commission, which were not applicable, was illegal and cannot withstand judicial scrutiny.” This statement highlights the court’s stance on the misapplication of pay scale revisions and emphasizes the need for a fair and legal approach in such matters.

The court’s directive for the recovery of excess pay indicates a move towards rectifying the unfair advantage gained by respondent No. 4. Furthermore, the judgment holds both the respondent and the responsible officers liable for reimbursing the exchequer, underlining the accountability of individuals in positions of authority.

Date of Decision: November 30, 2023

Dr. P.N. SHUKLA AND OTHERS  VS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS   

Latest Legal News