Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Orders Payment of Duty Call-up Allowance to Odisha Home Guards

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has directed the State of Odisha to pay Duty Call-up Allowance (DCA) to Home Guards at a rate of Rs. 533 per day, starting from the date of filing the writ petition. The judgment, delivered on March 17, 2023, by a bench comprising Justices M. R. Shah and M. M. Sundresh, affirmed the rights of Home Guards to receive fair compensation for their services. The Court emphasized that the payment should be in accordance with the minimum pay given to police personnel in the state.

The judgment, arising from the case of Prakash Kumar Jena & Ors. v. The State of Odisha & Ors., stemmed from a writ petition filed by Home Guards who had served for over 10 to 15 years. The petition sought salary disbursement as per a previous Supreme Court decision in the case of Grah Rakshak, Home Guards Welfare Association vs. State of Himachal Pradesh.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court noted, "The State of Odisha cannot be permitted to now submit that as contractual Constables appointed under Rule 2013 are being paid a fixed lump sum amount at the entry level, the Home Guards after rendering 10 to 15 years of service also shall be entitled to the same fixed salary. The aforesaid stand would be just contrary to the directions issued by this Court in the case of Grah Rakshak (supra) and the subsequent clarificatory order."

The Court further added, "The Home Guards shall be entitled to the periodical rise which may be available to the Police personnel of the State, and the DCA to be paid to the Home Guards be periodically increased taking into consideration the minimum of the pay to which the Police personnel of the State are entitled, considering periodical increase from time to time."

With this judgment, the Supreme Court has ensured that the Home Guards in Odisha will receive fair compensation for their dedicated service. The ruling sets a significant precedent, upholding the rights of Home Guards and establishing clear guidelines for the payment of DCA.

Date of Decision: March 17, 2023

PRAKASH KUMAR JENA & ORS.  vs THE STATE OF ODISHA & ORS.               

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/17-Mar-2023-Parksash-vs-State-Odisha.pdf"]

Latest Legal News