Bail | Right to Speedy Trial is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21: PH High Court    |     Postal Department’s Power to Enhance Penalties Time-Barred, Rules Allahabad High Court    |     Tenants Cannot Cross-Examine Landlords Unless Relationship is Disputed: Madras High Court    |     NDPS | Conscious Possession Extends to Vehicle Drivers: Telangana High Court Upholds 10-Year Sentence in Ganja Trafficking Case    |     Aid Reduction Of Without Due Process Unlawful: Rajasthan High Court Restores Full Grants for Educational Institutions    |     Assessment of Notional Income in Absence of Proof Cannot Be 'Mathematically Precise,' Says Patna High Court    |     NCLT's Resolution Plan Overrides State Tax Claims: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Demands Against Patanjali Foods    |     An Agreement is Not Voidable if the Party Could Discover the Truth with Ordinary Diligence: Calcutta High Court Quashes Termination of LPG Distributorship License    |     Independent Witnesses Contradict Prosecution's Story: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquit Accused in Arson Case    |     Merely Being a Joint Account Holder Does Not Attract Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act:  Gujarat High Court    |     Higher Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perversity is Found: Himachal Pradesh High Court Refused to Enhance Maintenance    |     Perpetual Lease Allows Division of Property: Delhi High Court Affirms Partition and Validity of Purdah Wall    |     "Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Videography in Temple Premises Limited to Religious Functions: Kerala High Court Orders to Restrict Non-Religious Activities on Temple Premises    |     Past Service Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Affirms Pension Rights for Daily Wage Employees    |     'Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ Does Not Mean Beyond All Doubt: Madras High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Man Convicted of Murdering Mother-in-Law    |    

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Consideration for Promotion, Excluding Uncommunicated ACRs

04 September 2024 9:50 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has ordered a fresh consideration for the promotion of R.K. Jibanlata Devi to the post of Assistant Registrar, setting aside the previous Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) decision. The judgment, delivered on February 24, 2023, by Justices M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar, emphasized the exclusion of uncommunicated Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) and highlighted the importance of fair assessment in promotion processes.

The Court, acknowledging the petitioner's claim for promotion based on seniority-cum-merit, directed a fresh assessment while disregarding the uncommunicated ACRs for the years 2016-17 and 2019-20. It emphasized that uncommunicated ACRs, even with a "Good" grading, cannot be relied upon for promotion considerations. Furthermore, the Court noted that the ACR grading for the year 2019-20, communicated to the petitioner just one day before the DPC meeting, should not have been considered since the petitioner was granted a 15-day period to make representations.

The judgment highlighted the need for fair and transparent assessment in promotion procedures. It clarified that the ACR weightage, accounting for 80 marks out of 100, should have been given due consideration during the interviews conducted by the Hon'ble Judges. The Court emphasized that the gradings in the ACRs and relevant information should have been made available to the interviewing Judges to ensure a fair evaluation.

In light of the ruling, the High Court of Manipur is required to undertake a fresh evaluation, taking into account the ACRs for the years 2017-18 and 2018-19. The Court directed the competent authority to complete the fresh consideration within six weeks from the date of the judgment. If the petitioner is promoted as a result, she will be entitled to all consequential benefits, including arrears and seniority, effective from the date of the promotion of her juniors.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the significance of effective communication of ACRs and fair assessment practices in the promotion of employees. It reinforces the principle of equal opportunity and highlights the need for transparent procedures to ensure justice in the workplace.

Date of Decision: February 24, 2023

R.K. Jibanlata Devi  VS High Court of Manipur through its Registrar General and others

Similar News