Rigours of UAPA Melt Before Article 21: Jharkhand High Court Grants Bail After Six Years of Incarceration Accused Cannot Challenge in Arguments What He Never Challenged in Cross-Examination: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction Counterblast Plea, Civil Dispute Defence No Shield When Cognizable Offence Is Disclosed: Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Ex-Driver Accused Of Outraging Modesty Lawyers Who Burned a Colleague's Furniture for Defending Toll Workers Have Tainted a Noble Profession: Supreme Court A Suspicious Dying Declaration Cannot Hang a Man: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Murder Conviction IQ of 65, Memory Loss, Frontal Lobe Damage: Supreme Court Holds Brain-Injured Manager Suffered 100% Functional Disability, Enhances Compensation to ₹97.73 Lakh Cannot Be Forced to Pay Gratuity to Retired Employees Who Refuse to Vacate Company Quarters: Supreme Court Victim Who Incited Riot Inside Court Cannot Blame Accused for Trial Delay: Supreme Court Grants Bail in Section 307 Case You Cannot Sell What You Don’t Own: ‘Vendor’s Half Share Means Buyer Gets Only Half’ : Andhra Pradesh High Court Nagaland's Oil Laws Face Constitutional Challenge: Gauhati High Court Sends Union-State Dispute to Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 3 CPC | Will's Validity Cannot Be Decided in Substitution Proceedings: Himachal Pradesh High Court 6-Year-Old Loses Arm To Live 11kV Wire Passing 'Almost Touching' Her Balcony: Punjab & Haryana High Court Awards Rs. 99.93 Lakh To Child Despite Nigam Blaming Father For 'Extending Balcony' Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 To Quash Rape & POCSO Conviction After Marriage Between Accused And Victim NGT Cannot Order Demolition of Temple On Ground of Encroachment of Park: Supreme Court Quashes Removal Order For Want of Jurisdiction Hostile Witnesses & Doubtful Recovery Can Collapse Prosecution: J&K High Court Sets High Threshold for Criminal Proof Compassion Cannot Override the Clock: Karnataka HC Denies Job to Guardian Aunt Despite 2021 Rule Change” Second Marriage During Pendency of Divorce Appeal Is Void: Kerala High Court Appearing in Exam Does Not Cure Attendance Deficiency: MP High Court Upholds 'Year Down' Against BBA Student With Sub-30% Attendance Patna High Court Directs Bihar To Submit Detailed Rehabilitation Plan For Recovered Mental Health Patients, Expand Half-Way Homes Across State Rajasthan High Court Upholds Refusal to Drop Bharat Band Stone-Pelting Case

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Consideration for Promotion, Excluding Uncommunicated ACRs

04 September 2024 9:50 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has ordered a fresh consideration for the promotion of R.K. Jibanlata Devi to the post of Assistant Registrar, setting aside the previous Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) decision. The judgment, delivered on February 24, 2023, by Justices M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar, emphasized the exclusion of uncommunicated Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) and highlighted the importance of fair assessment in promotion processes.

The Court, acknowledging the petitioner's claim for promotion based on seniority-cum-merit, directed a fresh assessment while disregarding the uncommunicated ACRs for the years 2016-17 and 2019-20. It emphasized that uncommunicated ACRs, even with a "Good" grading, cannot be relied upon for promotion considerations. Furthermore, the Court noted that the ACR grading for the year 2019-20, communicated to the petitioner just one day before the DPC meeting, should not have been considered since the petitioner was granted a 15-day period to make representations.

The judgment highlighted the need for fair and transparent assessment in promotion procedures. It clarified that the ACR weightage, accounting for 80 marks out of 100, should have been given due consideration during the interviews conducted by the Hon'ble Judges. The Court emphasized that the gradings in the ACRs and relevant information should have been made available to the interviewing Judges to ensure a fair evaluation.

In light of the ruling, the High Court of Manipur is required to undertake a fresh evaluation, taking into account the ACRs for the years 2017-18 and 2018-19. The Court directed the competent authority to complete the fresh consideration within six weeks from the date of the judgment. If the petitioner is promoted as a result, she will be entitled to all consequential benefits, including arrears and seniority, effective from the date of the promotion of her juniors.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the significance of effective communication of ACRs and fair assessment practices in the promotion of employees. It reinforces the principle of equal opportunity and highlights the need for transparent procedures to ensure justice in the workplace.

Date of Decision: February 24, 2023

R.K. Jibanlata Devi  VS High Court of Manipur through its Registrar General and others

Latest Legal News