Appellate Court Must Re-Appreciate Evidence To Determine Lesser Offence Under Section 386 CrPC If Graver Charge Is Not Sustained: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Provisions Override Other Laws Including Principles Of Res Judicata: Supreme Court Right To Information Act | CCTV Footage Cannot Be Provided Directly To Applicant If It Falls Under Section 8(1)(g) Exemptions: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Convenience Of Wife Is The Paramount Consideration In Transfer Of Matrimonial Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh High Court Inefficient Case Management By State Law Officers Impedes Justice: Allahabad High Court Directs Principal Secretary (Law) To Reform Procedures Section 24 CPC | Convenience Of Wife Is A Primary Consideration For Transfer Of Matrimonial Proceedings, But Virtual Appearance Can Mitigate Hardship: Andhra Pradesh High Court Son Cannot Claim Co-Ownership Or Resist Eviction Based On Alleged Financial Contribution To Property Purchased In Mother’s Name: Delhi High Court Order 33 Rule 1 CPC | Applicant Must Prove Inability To Pay Court Fee With Cogent Evidence; Mere Assertion Of Indigence Is Insufficient: Chhattisgarh High Court Plaintiff Must Establish Independent Right To Possession, Cannot Rely Solely On Lacunae In Defendant’s Evidence: Delhi High Court Successor Cannot Remain Silent: Bombay High Court Upholds Tenant's Right To Purchase Agricultural Land, Rules Rejection Before 1961 Amendment No Bar Single Mother Has Right To Determine Child’s Surname And Alter Biological Father's Name In Birth Certificate: Calcutta High Court Court Can Sanction Professional Fees Of Valuers Exceeding Prescribed Ceiling Post-Assignment: Bombay High Court MACT | Appellate Court Can Reduce Compensation Even If Insurer’s Appeal Challenges Quantum While Claimant Seeks Enhancement: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order VI Rule 17 CPC | Amendment Of Written Statement To Correct Internal Inconsistencies Does Not Amount To Withdrawal Of Admission: Delhi High Court Oral Family Partition Valid Even If Unregistered: Jharkhand High Court Power Of Attorney Lacking Explicit Interest Is Revocable Regardless Of 'Irrevocable' Label: Gujarat High Court DRC Act | Summary Eviction Proceedings Cannot Be Converted Into Extended Litigation By Seeking To File Additional Documents Post-Pleadings: Delhi High Court Financial Institutions Cannot Use 'Goonda-ism' For Repossession: Supreme Court Mandates Compensation For Violation Of Article 21 Motor Vehicles Act: Claimant Cannot Invoke Jurisdiction Of A Forum Where Neither Accident Occurred Nor Defendant Resides: Supreme Court Article 226 | Writ Court Cannot Decide Title Disputes Or Protect Possession If Factual Matrix Is Disputed: Supreme Court Suppression Of Material Facts In Writ Petition Under Article 32 Renders Challenge Non-Maintainable: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Orders Formation of Search Committees for Vice-Chancellor Appointments in West Bengal: 'Our Endeavour is to Infuse Transparency'

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Supreme Court Resolves Deadlock Between State Government and Chancellor Over University Leadership

In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court has intervened to address the ongoing stalemate over the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in state-aided universities in West Bengal. The bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant and K.V. Viswanathan, mandated the formation of Search-Cum-Selection Committees chaired by former Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit. This move aims to bring transparency and fairness to the appointment process amid disputes between the state government and the Chancellor.

The controversy stems from the West Bengal government's appointment of 24 Vice-Chancellors in 2022 without the inclusion of a University Grants Commission (UGC) nominee in the Search Committee, as required by law. The High Court ruled these appointments unsustainable, a decision upheld by the Supreme Court. Subsequently, the state attempted to extend the tenures of existing Vice-Chancellors, which was met with opposition from the Chancellor, leading to the appointment of interim Vice-Chancellors. The legality of these interim appointments was also challenged, resulting in a protracted legal battle.

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that the appointments were illegal due to the absence of UGC nominees in the Search Committees. The Court emphasized compliance with statutory requirements to ensure the credibility and legality of the appointments.

The Court noted the deep-seated conflict between the state government and the Chancellor, which had led to a governance vacuum in the universities. It highlighted the necessity for both parties to cooperate for the academic and administrative stability of the institutions.

To resolve the deadlock, the Court invoked its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to constitute Search-Cum-Selection Committees. These committees, chaired by Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, will include eminent educationists, scientists, jurists, and administrators, ensuring a fair and transparent selection process.

Justice Surya Kant remarked, "Our endeavour is to infuse transparency, independence, fairness, and impartiality so as to ensure that persons possessing the highest level of competence and integrity, capable of leading the University by example, are shortlisted."

The Supreme Court's intervention underscores the judiciary's role in upholding statutory mandates and ensuring fair governance in educational institutions. By constituting Search-Cum-Selection Committees, the Court aims to restore normalcy and integrity in the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in West Bengal. This landmark decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for the administration of universities across the state.

 

Date of Decision: July 8, 2024

The State of West Bengal vs. Dr. Sanat Kumar Ghosh and Ors.

Latest Legal News