Mere Allegations of Harassment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail to Wife in Matrimonial Suicide Case 'Convenience Of Wife Not A Thumb Rule, But Custody Of Minor Child Is A Weighing Aspect': Punjab & Haryana HC Transfers Divorce Case To Rohtak MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Cooperative Society Is A “Veritable Party” To Arbitration Clause In Flat Agreements, Temple Trust Entitled To Arbitrate As Non-Signatory: Bombay High Court State Government Cannot Review Its Own Revisional Orders Under Section 41(3): Allahabad High Court Affirms Legal Bar on Successive Reviews When Several Issues Arise, Courts Must Answer Each With Reasons: Supreme Court Automatic Retention Trumps Lessee Tag: Calcutta High Court Declares Saregama India ‘Raiyat’, Directs Reconsideration of Land Conversion Application Recovery of Valid Ticket Raises Presumption of Bona Fide Travel – Burden Shifts to Railways: Delhi High Court Restores Railway Accident Claim Failure to Frame Issue on Limitation Vitiates Award of Compensation Under Telegraph Act: Gauhati High Court Sets Aside Order, Remands Matter Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Heritable Right: Gujarat High Court Rejects 9-Year Delayed Claim, Orders Re-Issuance of ₹4 Lakh Compensation Court Cannot Rewrite Contracts to Suit Contractor’s Convenience: Kerala High Court Upholds Termination of Road Work Under Risk and Cost Clause Post-Bail Conduct Is Irrelevant in Appeal Against Grant of Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Crucial Distinction Between Appeal and Cancellation Granting Anticipatory Bail to a Long-Absconding Accused Makes a Mockery of the Judicial Process: Supreme Court Cracks Down on Pre-Arrest Bail in Murder Case Recognition as an Intangible Asset Does Not Confer Ownership: Supreme Court Draws a Sharp Line Between Accounting Entries and Property Rights IBC Cannot Be the Guiding Principle for Restructuring the Ownership and Control of Spectrum: Supreme Court Reasserts Public Trust Over Natural Resources Courts Cannot Convict First and Search for Law Later: Supreme Court Faults Prosecution for Ignoring Statutory Foundation in Cement Case When the Law Itself Stood Withdrawn, How Could Its Violation Survive?: Supreme Court Quashes 1994 Cement Conviction Under E.C. Act Ten Years Means Ten Years – Not a Day Less: Supreme Court Refuses to Dilute Statutory Experience Requirement for SET Exemption SET in Malayalam Cannot Qualify You to Teach Economics: Supreme Court Upholds Subject-Specific Eligibility for HSST Appointments Outsourcing Cannot Become A Tool To Defeat Regularization: Supreme Court On Perennial Nature Of Government Work Once Similarly Placed Workers Were Regularized, Denial to Others Is Discrimination: Supreme Court Directs Regularization of Income Tax Daily-Wage Workers Right To Form Association Is Protected — But Not A Right To Run It Free From Regulation: Supreme Court Recalibrates Article 19 In Sports Governance S. Nithya Cannot Be Transplanted Into Cricket: Supreme Court Shields District Cricket Bodies From Judicially Imposed Structural Overhaul Will | Propounder Must Dispel Every Suspicious Circumstance — Failure Is Fatal: : Punjab & Haryana High Court Electronic Evidence Authenticity Jeopardized by Unexplained Delay and Procedural Omissions: MP High Court Rejects Belated 65B Application Not Answering to the Questions of the IO Would Not Ipso Facto Mean There Is Non-Cooperation: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Undertaking to Satisfy Award Is Not Waiver of Appeal: Supreme Court Restores Insurer’s Statutory Right

Supreme Court Orders Formation of Search Committees for Vice-Chancellor Appointments in West Bengal: 'Our Endeavour is to Infuse Transparency'

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Supreme Court Resolves Deadlock Between State Government and Chancellor Over University Leadership

In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court has intervened to address the ongoing stalemate over the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in state-aided universities in West Bengal. The bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant and K.V. Viswanathan, mandated the formation of Search-Cum-Selection Committees chaired by former Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit. This move aims to bring transparency and fairness to the appointment process amid disputes between the state government and the Chancellor.

The controversy stems from the West Bengal government's appointment of 24 Vice-Chancellors in 2022 without the inclusion of a University Grants Commission (UGC) nominee in the Search Committee, as required by law. The High Court ruled these appointments unsustainable, a decision upheld by the Supreme Court. Subsequently, the state attempted to extend the tenures of existing Vice-Chancellors, which was met with opposition from the Chancellor, leading to the appointment of interim Vice-Chancellors. The legality of these interim appointments was also challenged, resulting in a protracted legal battle.

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that the appointments were illegal due to the absence of UGC nominees in the Search Committees. The Court emphasized compliance with statutory requirements to ensure the credibility and legality of the appointments.

The Court noted the deep-seated conflict between the state government and the Chancellor, which had led to a governance vacuum in the universities. It highlighted the necessity for both parties to cooperate for the academic and administrative stability of the institutions.

To resolve the deadlock, the Court invoked its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to constitute Search-Cum-Selection Committees. These committees, chaired by Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, will include eminent educationists, scientists, jurists, and administrators, ensuring a fair and transparent selection process.

Justice Surya Kant remarked, "Our endeavour is to infuse transparency, independence, fairness, and impartiality so as to ensure that persons possessing the highest level of competence and integrity, capable of leading the University by example, are shortlisted."

The Supreme Court's intervention underscores the judiciary's role in upholding statutory mandates and ensuring fair governance in educational institutions. By constituting Search-Cum-Selection Committees, the Court aims to restore normalcy and integrity in the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in West Bengal. This landmark decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for the administration of universities across the state.

 

Date of Decision: July 8, 2024

The State of West Bengal vs. Dr. Sanat Kumar Ghosh and Ors.

Latest Legal News