Bail | Right to Speedy Trial is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21: PH High Court    |     Postal Department’s Power to Enhance Penalties Time-Barred, Rules Allahabad High Court    |     Tenants Cannot Cross-Examine Landlords Unless Relationship is Disputed: Madras High Court    |     NDPS | Conscious Possession Extends to Vehicle Drivers: Telangana High Court Upholds 10-Year Sentence in Ganja Trafficking Case    |     Aid Reduction Of Without Due Process Unlawful: Rajasthan High Court Restores Full Grants for Educational Institutions    |     Assessment of Notional Income in Absence of Proof Cannot Be 'Mathematically Precise,' Says Patna High Court    |     NCLT's Resolution Plan Overrides State Tax Claims: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Demands Against Patanjali Foods    |     An Agreement is Not Voidable if the Party Could Discover the Truth with Ordinary Diligence: Calcutta High Court Quashes Termination of LPG Distributorship License    |     Independent Witnesses Contradict Prosecution's Story: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquit Accused in Arson Case    |     Merely Being a Joint Account Holder Does Not Attract Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act:  Gujarat High Court    |     Higher Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perversity is Found: Himachal Pradesh High Court Refused to Enhance Maintenance    |     Perpetual Lease Allows Division of Property: Delhi High Court Affirms Partition and Validity of Purdah Wall    |     "Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Videography in Temple Premises Limited to Religious Functions: Kerala High Court Orders to Restrict Non-Religious Activities on Temple Premises    |     Past Service Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Affirms Pension Rights for Daily Wage Employees    |     'Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ Does Not Mean Beyond All Doubt: Madras High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Man Convicted of Murdering Mother-in-Law    |    

Supreme Court Orders Formation of Search Committees for Vice-Chancellor Appointments in West Bengal: 'Our Endeavour is to Infuse Transparency'

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Supreme Court Resolves Deadlock Between State Government and Chancellor Over University Leadership

In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court has intervened to address the ongoing stalemate over the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in state-aided universities in West Bengal. The bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant and K.V. Viswanathan, mandated the formation of Search-Cum-Selection Committees chaired by former Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit. This move aims to bring transparency and fairness to the appointment process amid disputes between the state government and the Chancellor.

The controversy stems from the West Bengal government's appointment of 24 Vice-Chancellors in 2022 without the inclusion of a University Grants Commission (UGC) nominee in the Search Committee, as required by law. The High Court ruled these appointments unsustainable, a decision upheld by the Supreme Court. Subsequently, the state attempted to extend the tenures of existing Vice-Chancellors, which was met with opposition from the Chancellor, leading to the appointment of interim Vice-Chancellors. The legality of these interim appointments was also challenged, resulting in a protracted legal battle.

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that the appointments were illegal due to the absence of UGC nominees in the Search Committees. The Court emphasized compliance with statutory requirements to ensure the credibility and legality of the appointments.

The Court noted the deep-seated conflict between the state government and the Chancellor, which had led to a governance vacuum in the universities. It highlighted the necessity for both parties to cooperate for the academic and administrative stability of the institutions.

To resolve the deadlock, the Court invoked its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to constitute Search-Cum-Selection Committees. These committees, chaired by Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, will include eminent educationists, scientists, jurists, and administrators, ensuring a fair and transparent selection process.

Justice Surya Kant remarked, "Our endeavour is to infuse transparency, independence, fairness, and impartiality so as to ensure that persons possessing the highest level of competence and integrity, capable of leading the University by example, are shortlisted."

The Supreme Court's intervention underscores the judiciary's role in upholding statutory mandates and ensuring fair governance in educational institutions. By constituting Search-Cum-Selection Committees, the Court aims to restore normalcy and integrity in the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in West Bengal. This landmark decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for the administration of universities across the state.

 

Date of Decision: July 8, 2024

The State of West Bengal vs. Dr. Sanat Kumar Ghosh and Ors.

Similar News