Conviction Under Section 326 IPC Requires Proof of ‘Dangerous Weapon’ – Supreme Court Modifies Conviction to Section 325 IPC Marital Disputes Must Not Become Never-Ending Legal Battles – Supreme Court Ends 12-Year-Long Litigation with Final Settlement Denial of Pre-Charge Evidence is a Violation of Fair Trial: Supreme Court Restores Complainant’s Right to Testify Slum Redevelopment Cannot Be Held Hostage by a Few Dissenters – Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Eviction Notices Termination of Judicial Probationers Without Inquiry Violates Principles of Natural Justice – Allahabad High Court Quashes Discharge Orders A Celebrity’s Name is Not Public Property – No One Can Exploit It Without Consent – High Court Bars Release of Film Titled ‘Shaadi Ke Director Karan Aur Johar’ Truck Driver's Negligence Fully Established – No Contributory Negligence by Car Driver: Delhi High Court Enhances Compensation in Fatal Accident Case Stamp Duty Demand After 15 Years is Legally Unsustainable – Karnataka High Court Quashes Proceedings Licensees Cannot Claim Adverse Possession, Says Kerala High Court No Evidence Directly Implicating Acquitted Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Acquittal in ₹55 Lakh Bank Fraud Compensatory Aspect of Cheque Bounce Cases Must Be Given Priority Over Punishment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Income Tax | Transfer Pricing Adjustments Must Be Based on Economic Reality, Not Hypothetical Comparisons: Delhi High Court Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC is a Legal Mandate, Not a Mere Technicality: Kerala High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Police Officers Bail Cannot Be Granted When Prima Facie Evidence Links Accused to Terrorist Activities—Andhra Pradesh High Court Denies Bail Under UAPA" Statutory Bail Cannot Be Cancelled Without Justifiable Grounds—Calcutta High Court Reinstates Bail for NIA Case Accused Juvenile Justice Cannot Be Ignored for Heinous Crimes—Bail to Minor in Murder Case Upheld: Delhi High Court Litigants Cannot Sleep Over Their Rights and Wake Up at the Last Minute: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Plea to Reopen Ex-Parte Case After 16 Years Economic Offenses With Deep-Rooted Conspiracies Must Be Treated Differently—Bail Cannot Be Granted Lightly: Chhattisgarh High Court Denies Bail in ₹5.39 Crore Money Laundering Case Tenant Cannot Deny Landlord’s Title Once Property Is Sold—Eviction Upheld: Jharkhand High Court Pending Criminal Case Cannot Be a Ground to Deny Passport Renewal Unless Cognizance Is Taken by Court: Karnataka High Court Conviction Cannot Rest on Suspicion—Kerala High Court Acquits Mother and Son in Murder Case Over Flawed Evidence Seized Assets Cannot Be Released During Trial—Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Gali Janardhan Reddy’s Plea for Gold and Bonds Remarriage Cannot Disqualify a Widow From Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Unregistered Sale Agreement Gives No Right to Possession—Madras High Court Rejects Injunction Against Property Owners

Supreme Court Orders Formation of Search Committees for Vice-Chancellor Appointments in West Bengal: 'Our Endeavour is to Infuse Transparency'

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Supreme Court Resolves Deadlock Between State Government and Chancellor Over University Leadership

In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court has intervened to address the ongoing stalemate over the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in state-aided universities in West Bengal. The bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant and K.V. Viswanathan, mandated the formation of Search-Cum-Selection Committees chaired by former Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit. This move aims to bring transparency and fairness to the appointment process amid disputes between the state government and the Chancellor.

The controversy stems from the West Bengal government's appointment of 24 Vice-Chancellors in 2022 without the inclusion of a University Grants Commission (UGC) nominee in the Search Committee, as required by law. The High Court ruled these appointments unsustainable, a decision upheld by the Supreme Court. Subsequently, the state attempted to extend the tenures of existing Vice-Chancellors, which was met with opposition from the Chancellor, leading to the appointment of interim Vice-Chancellors. The legality of these interim appointments was also challenged, resulting in a protracted legal battle.

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that the appointments were illegal due to the absence of UGC nominees in the Search Committees. The Court emphasized compliance with statutory requirements to ensure the credibility and legality of the appointments.

The Court noted the deep-seated conflict between the state government and the Chancellor, which had led to a governance vacuum in the universities. It highlighted the necessity for both parties to cooperate for the academic and administrative stability of the institutions.

To resolve the deadlock, the Court invoked its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to constitute Search-Cum-Selection Committees. These committees, chaired by Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, will include eminent educationists, scientists, jurists, and administrators, ensuring a fair and transparent selection process.

Justice Surya Kant remarked, "Our endeavour is to infuse transparency, independence, fairness, and impartiality so as to ensure that persons possessing the highest level of competence and integrity, capable of leading the University by example, are shortlisted."

The Supreme Court's intervention underscores the judiciary's role in upholding statutory mandates and ensuring fair governance in educational institutions. By constituting Search-Cum-Selection Committees, the Court aims to restore normalcy and integrity in the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in West Bengal. This landmark decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for the administration of universities across the state.

 

Date of Decision: July 8, 2024

The State of West Bengal vs. Dr. Sanat Kumar Ghosh and Ors.

Similar News