Allegations In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Specific And Supported By Foundation Facts To Avoid Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies Sentence To Period Already Undergone Citing Medical Condition And Expression Of Remorse Qualification Of '10+2 System' Cannot Be Equated With Other Certifications Absent An Equivalence Clause: Supreme Court Essential Qualifications In Recruitment Cannot Be Diluted Or Subject To Judicial Equivalence: Supreme Court Court Has Discretion To Decide Genuineness Of Signature By Comparison; Not Essential To Invoke Expert Opinion In All Cases: Supreme Court Civil Disputes Cannot Be Converted Into Criminal Offences To Recover Money: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Under Section 420 IPC Taxing Authorities Must Classify Goods Based On Form At Time Of Sale, Not End Use: Supreme Court Suit For Declaration Of Status Must Seek Consequential Relief To Avoid Bar Of Proviso: Allahabad High Court Illegal Detention | Police Failure To Maintain CCTV Footage Invokes Adverse Presumption Under Sec 119 BSA Against State: Allahabad High Court Section 138 NI Act | Accused Rebuts Presumption By Proving Intimation Of Misplaced Cheque To Bank And Lack Of Documentation For Alleged Settlement: Andhra Pradesh High Court Garnishee Proceedings Under CPC | Disputed Debt Cannot Be Summarily Adjudicated Without Leading Evidence: Bombay High Court Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act 2022 | Magistrate’s Power Under Section 5 To Direct DNA Profiling Is Not Conditional Upon Consent: Calcutta High Court Conviction Based On 'Assumption And Presumption' Cannot Be Sustained: Bombay High Court Acquits Husband Limitation Act | Suit For Specific Performance Must Be Filed Within Reasonable Time Even If No Date For Performance Is Fixed: Delhi High Court Enrolment As Advocate | Bar Council Must Consider 'Equivalent Qualifications' Under Rule 4(a) Rules Of Legal Education: Karnataka High Court Section 482 BNSS | Pre-Arrest Bail Is Not A Matter Of Course; Must Show Special Case For Invoking Extraordinary Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Hindu Succession Act | A Co-parcener Cannot Alienate Entire Property; Non-Impleaded Legal Heir Not Bound By Previous Decree: Madras High Court Purchaser During Pendency Of Suit Bound By Compromise Decree, Cannot Treat It As Void In Collateral Proceedings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 23 Rule 1-A CPC | In Partition Suits, Defendants Asserting A Share Can Seek Transposition If Original Plaintiffs Withdraw: Patna High Court Section 69 BNS | Suppression Of Subsisting Marriage Or Live-In Relationship During Marriage Proposal Constitutes 'Deceitful Means': Kerala High Court Anticipatory Bail | Mere Apprehension Of Investigating Agency Is Insufficient To Deny Bail Without Demonstrating Necessity Of Custodial Interrogation: Telangana High Court Income Tax Evasion | Criminal Prosecution Under Section 276C IT Act Cannot Sustain Once Foundation Assessment Order Is Set Aside: Punjab & Haryana High Court Election Petition Must Be Presented By Petitioner In Person, Non-Compliance Renders It Liable To Summary Dismissal: Supreme Court Absence Of Recovery Or Evidence Of Stolen Property Precludes Conviction Under Section 394 IPC: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Orders Formation of Search Committees for Vice-Chancellor Appointments in West Bengal: 'Our Endeavour is to Infuse Transparency'

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Supreme Court Resolves Deadlock Between State Government and Chancellor Over University Leadership

In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court has intervened to address the ongoing stalemate over the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in state-aided universities in West Bengal. The bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant and K.V. Viswanathan, mandated the formation of Search-Cum-Selection Committees chaired by former Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit. This move aims to bring transparency and fairness to the appointment process amid disputes between the state government and the Chancellor.

The controversy stems from the West Bengal government's appointment of 24 Vice-Chancellors in 2022 without the inclusion of a University Grants Commission (UGC) nominee in the Search Committee, as required by law. The High Court ruled these appointments unsustainable, a decision upheld by the Supreme Court. Subsequently, the state attempted to extend the tenures of existing Vice-Chancellors, which was met with opposition from the Chancellor, leading to the appointment of interim Vice-Chancellors. The legality of these interim appointments was also challenged, resulting in a protracted legal battle.

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that the appointments were illegal due to the absence of UGC nominees in the Search Committees. The Court emphasized compliance with statutory requirements to ensure the credibility and legality of the appointments.

The Court noted the deep-seated conflict between the state government and the Chancellor, which had led to a governance vacuum in the universities. It highlighted the necessity for both parties to cooperate for the academic and administrative stability of the institutions.

To resolve the deadlock, the Court invoked its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to constitute Search-Cum-Selection Committees. These committees, chaired by Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, will include eminent educationists, scientists, jurists, and administrators, ensuring a fair and transparent selection process.

Justice Surya Kant remarked, "Our endeavour is to infuse transparency, independence, fairness, and impartiality so as to ensure that persons possessing the highest level of competence and integrity, capable of leading the University by example, are shortlisted."

The Supreme Court's intervention underscores the judiciary's role in upholding statutory mandates and ensuring fair governance in educational institutions. By constituting Search-Cum-Selection Committees, the Court aims to restore normalcy and integrity in the appointment of Vice-Chancellors in West Bengal. This landmark decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for the administration of universities across the state.

 

Date of Decision: July 8, 2024

The State of West Bengal vs. Dr. Sanat Kumar Ghosh and Ors.

Latest Legal News