Where Medical Evidence Creates Reasonable Doubt, Benefit Must Go To The Accused: Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Murder Conviction Lok Adalat Award Cannot Override Registered Lease Deed: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Execution Petition for Eviction Deemed Conveyance Does Not Enlarge Title — Civil Court Must Adjudicate Ownership Disputes: Bombay High Court Common Intention Must Be Proved—No One Can Be Convicted Solely for Being Named Among a Group: Calcutta High Court Mere Abusive Language or Threat, Without Sexual Colour, Does Not Attract Section 354A IPC: Delhi High Court Forcing a Child to Carry the Trauma Is an Assault on Dignity: Gujarat High Court Allows Termination of 15-Week Pregnancy of 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor Framing of Charge is Not a Final Order, No Appeal Lies Under Section 14A of SC/ST Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Interest Earned from Axis Bank Is ‘Attributable’ to Credit Business – Not a Separate Source of Income: ITAT Chennai Grants 80P Deduction Must Be Proved, Not May Be Proved: Karnataka High Court Upholds Triple Murder Conviction On Complete Chain Of Circumstantial Evidence Statutory Scheme Overrides Hereditary Claims: Kerala High Court Upholds Executive Officer Appointment at Malamakkavu Ayyappa Temple No Mid-Stream Change In Examination Centre Once Exams Are Underway:  Orissa High Court Draws Line On Judicial Interference Forest Allegation Found Baseless, Petitioner Had Personal Grudge: NGT Dismisses Plea Alleging Illegal Mining in Raisen Protected Forest CPC Has No Role in Consumer Forums: National Commission Slams Procedural Missteps in Insurance Complaint Transfer Case Permit Is Not a Formality, It’s a Legal Necessity: Madhya Pradesh High Court Directs Insurer to ‘Pay and Recover’ for Accident Caused by Vehicle Plying Outside Authorized States A Compromise Before Court Is Not a Private Contract but a Solemn Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail Senior Citizens Misled with FD Promises Can’t Be Bound by Insurance Contracts: Chandigarh State Commission Upholds Full Refund with Interest No Specific Forum Under Trust Act to Adjudicate Election Disputes Involving Fraud: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction Mere Presence is Not Conspiracy: Kerala High Court Grants Bail in Ganja Case Where Intermediate Quantity Alone Recovered from Accused Sufficient Cause Is Not a Matter of Sympathy, But Substance: Bombay High Court Rejects 645-Day Delay in Filing Review Petition

Supreme Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines for Enhanced Security and Digitization of Judicial Infrastructure

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta, has addressed pressing concerns regarding security breaches within court premises and the urgent need for technological advancements in the judicial system. The court’s observations shed light on the critical nature of these issues and their far-reaching consequences.

The court’s observations highlighted the urgency of the situation, with Justice S. Ravindra Bhat stating, “Would not hope for the litigants who visit the temples of justice dwindle, if the very halls of justice lack the shield of security? How can the litigants secure justice for them when those entrusted to render justice are themselves insecure?” The court emphasized that recent incidents of gunfire within court premises have exposed vulnerabilities that jeopardize the safety of judges, lawyers, court staff, litigants, and the general public.

Acknowledging the tragic incident involving an Additional Sessions Judge, the court expressed concerns about the personal safety of judges. Justice Dipankar Datta noted, “Lives of judges, off the court, of late are also not entirely safe and secure.” The court stressed the importance of implementing comprehensive security protocols to preserve the sanctity of the judicial process.

Addressing the pending contempt petition related to the violation of court orders on the installation of CCTV cameras, the court highlighted two crucial issues. The installation of security measures within court premises and the introduction of audio-visual recording during trials were identified as vital steps toward enhancing the safety and transparency of the justice delivery system.

The court’s guidelines include recommendations for the establishment of security plans, permanent Court Security Units, meticulous CCTV camera installation, modern security equipment, and comprehensive digitization of judicial infrastructure. The court emphasized that immediate measures should be undertaken alongside long-term solutions to ensure the safety of all stakeholders and to maintain faith in the judicial system.

The Supreme Court’s ruling underscores the significance of these issues and urges the prioritization of these measures. It has directed High Courts to provide monthly reports on the implementation status of the guidelines. The court’s proactive approach aims to enhance access to justice, prevent untoward incidents, and fortify the safety and security of the judicial ecosystem.

The court’s comprehensive judgement is a step forward in ensuring the safety and integrity of the judicial process, with the next hearing scheduled for October 12, 2023.

Date of Decision: 11th August, 2023

PRADYUMAN BISHT vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS    

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/11-Aug-2023_Pardyuman_Vs_UOI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News