Cheque Bounce Cases Should Ordinarily Be Sent To Mediation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Calls For Mediation In NI Act Matters 138 NI Act | Belated Plea Of Forged Signatures Cannot Be Used To Delay Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Handwriting Expert Sections 332 & 333 IPC | Lawful Discharge Of Duty Must Be Proved, Mere Status As Public Servant Not Enough: Allahabad High Court Bus Conductor Accused of Assaulting Traffic Inspectors Custody With Biological Mother Cannot Ordinarily Be Treated As Illegal Detention: Delhi High Court Refuses Habeas Corpus For Return Of Child To Canada Foreign Custody Orders Must Yield To Welfare Of Child: Delhi High Court Refuses To Enforce Canadian Return Order Through Habeas Corpus Possible Criminal Racket Luring Young Girls Through Self-Proclaimed Peers And Tantriks Must Be Examined: J&K High Court Orders Wider Judicial Scrutiny Nomenclature Cannot Determine Constitutional Entitlement: Supreme Court Strikes Down Exclusion Of ‘Academic Arrangement’ Employees From Regularisation Testimony Of Related Witnesses Cannot Be Discarded Merely For Relationship: Supreme Court Upholds Murder Conviction 149 IPC | Presence In Unlawful Assembly Is Enough For Murder Liability”: Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Directly Recruited Engineers Entitled To Seniority From Date Of Initial Appointment Including Training Period: Supreme Court Section 32 Evidence Act | If There Is Even An Iota Of Suspicion, Dying Declaration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court Framing A Case On Public Perceptions And Personal Predilections Ends Up In A Mess: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal In Alleged Parricide Arson Case When Oppression Petition Is Pending, Courts Must Ensure The Subject Matter Does Not Disappear Before Adjudication: Supreme Court Orders Status Quo In ₹1000 Crore Redevelopment Dispute Parties Cannot Participate In Arbitration And Later Challenge The Process Only After An Unfavourable Outcome : Supreme Court ICSID Clause Is Only A Fail-Safe Mechanism, Not A Restriction: Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal’s Constitution In MCGM Dispute Passive Euthanasia | 'Right To Die With Dignity Is An Intrinsic Facet Of Article 21': Supreme Court Permits Withdrawal Of Life Support Medical Board Must Record Reasons Before Denying Disability Pension To Armed Forces Personnel: Kerala High Court Grants Disability Pension To Air Force Corporal 138 NI Act | Directors Cannot Be Prosecuted If Company Is Not Made Accused: Allahabad High Court Quashes Cheque Bounce Cases Broad Daylight Removal of Goods by Known Creditors Is Not Theft: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Shopkeeper’s Insurance Claim Reservation Cannot Freeze Private Land Forever – Lapse Under Section 127 MRTP Act Operates Automatically: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Transfer On Marriage Cannot Defeat Helper’s First Right To Promotion: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Anganwadi Helper’s Promotion Where Accusations Are Prima Facie True, Statutory Bar Under Section 43D(5) UAPA Operates; Bail Cannot Be Granted: Jharkhand High Court Bomb Hurled At Head Of Victim Shows Clear Intention To Kill: Kerala High Court Upholds Life Sentence In Kannur Political Murder Case Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment

Supreme Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines for Enhanced Security and Digitization of Judicial Infrastructure

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta, has addressed pressing concerns regarding security breaches within court premises and the urgent need for technological advancements in the judicial system. The court’s observations shed light on the critical nature of these issues and their far-reaching consequences.

The court’s observations highlighted the urgency of the situation, with Justice S. Ravindra Bhat stating, “Would not hope for the litigants who visit the temples of justice dwindle, if the very halls of justice lack the shield of security? How can the litigants secure justice for them when those entrusted to render justice are themselves insecure?” The court emphasized that recent incidents of gunfire within court premises have exposed vulnerabilities that jeopardize the safety of judges, lawyers, court staff, litigants, and the general public.

Acknowledging the tragic incident involving an Additional Sessions Judge, the court expressed concerns about the personal safety of judges. Justice Dipankar Datta noted, “Lives of judges, off the court, of late are also not entirely safe and secure.” The court stressed the importance of implementing comprehensive security protocols to preserve the sanctity of the judicial process.

Addressing the pending contempt petition related to the violation of court orders on the installation of CCTV cameras, the court highlighted two crucial issues. The installation of security measures within court premises and the introduction of audio-visual recording during trials were identified as vital steps toward enhancing the safety and transparency of the justice delivery system.

The court’s guidelines include recommendations for the establishment of security plans, permanent Court Security Units, meticulous CCTV camera installation, modern security equipment, and comprehensive digitization of judicial infrastructure. The court emphasized that immediate measures should be undertaken alongside long-term solutions to ensure the safety of all stakeholders and to maintain faith in the judicial system.

The Supreme Court’s ruling underscores the significance of these issues and urges the prioritization of these measures. It has directed High Courts to provide monthly reports on the implementation status of the guidelines. The court’s proactive approach aims to enhance access to justice, prevent untoward incidents, and fortify the safety and security of the judicial ecosystem.

The court’s comprehensive judgement is a step forward in ensuring the safety and integrity of the judicial process, with the next hearing scheduled for October 12, 2023.

Date of Decision: 11th August, 2023

PRADYUMAN BISHT vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS    

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/11-Aug-2023_Pardyuman_Vs_UOI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News