Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Article 21-A Cannot Be Held Hostage to Transfer Preferences: Allahabad High Court Upholds Teacher Redeployment to Enforce Pupil–Teacher Ratio Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Paying Tax Does Not Legalise Illegality: Bombay High Court Refuses to Shield Alleged Unauthorized Structure Beneficial Pension Scheme Cannot Be Defeated By Cut-Off Dates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs EPFO To Follow Sunil Kumar B. Guidelines On Higher Pension Claims

Supreme Court Grants Probation in 37-Year-Old Essential Commodities Act Violation Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India granted probation to an appellant in a 37-year-old case involving a violation of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The appellant had been convicted under Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Act for exceeding the permissible limit of mustard oil and vegetable oil as per the West Bengal Pulses, Edible Oil (Dealers Licensing) Order, 1978.

The trial court had sentenced the appellant to six months of rigorous imprisonment along with a fine, which was later reduced to three months by the High Court. However, considering the lengthy duration of the case and the appellant's clean record, the Supreme Court exercised its discretion under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. The appellant was released on probation upon entering into a bond and providing sureties.

This judgment highlights the Court's recognition of the passage of time and the need for appropriate sentencing in cases of long-pending matters. The decision also underscores the application of the Probation of Offenders Act to mitigate the sentence imposed under the Essential Commodities Act.

Date of Judgment: May 10, 2023

Tarak Nath Keshari  vs State of West Bengal 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/10-May-2023-Tarak-Nath-vs-State.pdf"]

Latest Legal News