Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

Supreme Court Grants Mutual Consent Divorce with Quantified Permanent Alimony

06 September 2024 5:13 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment delivered today, the Supreme Court of India granted a mutual consent divorce to a couple and quantified the amount of permanent alimony to be paid by the husband. The judgment was pronounced by Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah.

The case, titled "Mansi Khatri vs. Gaurav Khatri," involved a Transfer Petition filed by the wife, seeking the transfer of the Divorce Petition filed by the husband from the Family Court in Indore, Madhya Pradesh to the Family Court in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh.

The Supreme Court observed that the parties had experienced an irretrievable breakdown of their marriage. In the interest of rendering complete justice, the Court decided to exercise its power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. As a result, the Court closed all the cases filed by the parties against each other and granted a decree of mutual consent divorce.

One of the key issues in the case was the quantification of permanent alimony. The wife had claimed an amount of Rs. 70,00,000 (Rupees Seventy Lakhs), while the husband had offered Rs. 25,00,000 (Rupees Twenty-Five Lakhs). After considering the financial positions of the parties, the Supreme Court quantified the permanent alimony at Rs. 35,00,000 (Rupees Thirty-Five Lakhs). The husband was directed to pay this amount within six months from the date of the judgment.

The Court also quashed the First Information Report (FIR) filed by the petitioner's father, as well as the Maintenance Case filed by the petitioner in Lucknow. However, it was clarified that if the husband failed to pay the quantified permanent alimony within the stipulated time, the quashed FIR and Maintenance Case would be revived.

The judgment signifies the Court's recognition of the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage and aims to provide a fair resolution for both parties involved. The decision reflects the Court's commitment to upholding justice and maintaining the sanctity of marital relationships.

Date of Decision: May 19, 2023

MANSI KHATRI vs GAURAV KHATRI       

Latest Legal News