Bail | Right to Speedy Trial is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21: PH High Court    |     Postal Department’s Power to Enhance Penalties Time-Barred, Rules Allahabad High Court    |     Tenants Cannot Cross-Examine Landlords Unless Relationship is Disputed: Madras High Court    |     NDPS | Conscious Possession Extends to Vehicle Drivers: Telangana High Court Upholds 10-Year Sentence in Ganja Trafficking Case    |     Aid Reduction Of Without Due Process Unlawful: Rajasthan High Court Restores Full Grants for Educational Institutions    |     Assessment of Notional Income in Absence of Proof Cannot Be 'Mathematically Precise,' Says Patna High Court    |     NCLT's Resolution Plan Overrides State Tax Claims: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Demands Against Patanjali Foods    |     An Agreement is Not Voidable if the Party Could Discover the Truth with Ordinary Diligence: Calcutta High Court Quashes Termination of LPG Distributorship License    |     Independent Witnesses Contradict Prosecution's Story: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquit Accused in Arson Case    |     Merely Being a Joint Account Holder Does Not Attract Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act:  Gujarat High Court    |     Higher Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perversity is Found: Himachal Pradesh High Court Refused to Enhance Maintenance    |     Perpetual Lease Allows Division of Property: Delhi High Court Affirms Partition and Validity of Purdah Wall    |     "Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Videography in Temple Premises Limited to Religious Functions: Kerala High Court Orders to Restrict Non-Religious Activities on Temple Premises    |     Past Service Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Affirms Pension Rights for Daily Wage Employees    |     'Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ Does Not Mean Beyond All Doubt: Madras High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Man Convicted of Murdering Mother-in-Law    |    

Supreme Court Grants Mutual Consent Divorce with Quantified Permanent Alimony

06 September 2024 5:13 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment delivered today, the Supreme Court of India granted a mutual consent divorce to a couple and quantified the amount of permanent alimony to be paid by the husband. The judgment was pronounced by Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah.

The case, titled "Mansi Khatri vs. Gaurav Khatri," involved a Transfer Petition filed by the wife, seeking the transfer of the Divorce Petition filed by the husband from the Family Court in Indore, Madhya Pradesh to the Family Court in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh.

The Supreme Court observed that the parties had experienced an irretrievable breakdown of their marriage. In the interest of rendering complete justice, the Court decided to exercise its power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. As a result, the Court closed all the cases filed by the parties against each other and granted a decree of mutual consent divorce.

One of the key issues in the case was the quantification of permanent alimony. The wife had claimed an amount of Rs. 70,00,000 (Rupees Seventy Lakhs), while the husband had offered Rs. 25,00,000 (Rupees Twenty-Five Lakhs). After considering the financial positions of the parties, the Supreme Court quantified the permanent alimony at Rs. 35,00,000 (Rupees Thirty-Five Lakhs). The husband was directed to pay this amount within six months from the date of the judgment.

The Court also quashed the First Information Report (FIR) filed by the petitioner's father, as well as the Maintenance Case filed by the petitioner in Lucknow. However, it was clarified that if the husband failed to pay the quantified permanent alimony within the stipulated time, the quashed FIR and Maintenance Case would be revived.

The judgment signifies the Court's recognition of the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage and aims to provide a fair resolution for both parties involved. The decision reflects the Court's commitment to upholding justice and maintaining the sanctity of marital relationships.

Date of Decision: May 19, 2023

MANSI KHATRI vs GAURAV KHATRI       

Similar News