Supreme Court Grants Bail to Man After One Year in Jail, Bars Social Media Contact with Complainant Supreme Court Grants Bail to Teen, Emphasizes Consensual Relationship in POCSO Case Involving 16-Year-Old Once Decided, Forever Closed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Bars Appeal Citing Res Judicata Supreme Court Halts Trial, Calls Continuing Proceedings a "Travesty of Justice" in ₹50 Crore Corruption Case A Married Woman's Consensual Relationship Does Not Attract Section 376 IPC in Absence of False Promise: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Lawyer Mere Possession of Proceeds of Crime Sufficient for Money Laundering Charges: Madras High Court Upholds Money Laundering Case Against Former Trustee of All India Overseas Bank Employees Union Age Is Not a Measure of Competence - But Public Safety Prevails: Calcutta High Court Upholds Age Restrictions for Electrical Supervisor Certification Landlord Cannot Claim Eviction Without Proving Genuine Need: Bombay High Court Overturns Eviction Decree Future Prospects Must Be Considered for Deceased Below 40 Years with a Permanent Job: Andhra Pradesh High Court Enhances Compensation NDPS | Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Granted When Accused Have Absconded and Failed to Cooperate in Investigation: Delhi High Court Continuing Prosecution in Light of Genuine Compromise Would Not Serve Justice:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes FIR for Attempt to Murder Allahabad High Court Denies Bail, Cites Lack of Extradition Treaty with China: ‘High Flight Risk’ in Fraud Case Custodial Interrogation Necessary for Effective Investigation: Anticipatory Bail Denied by Punjab & Haryana High Court in ₹1.19 Crore Cheating Case

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Teen, Emphasizes Consensual Relationship in POCSO Case Involving 16-Year-Old

08 October 2024 10:41 AM

By: sayum


Supreme Court of India granted bail to Deshraj @ Musa in Deshraj @ Musa vs State of Rajasthan (Criminal Appeal No. 11020/2024), who had been charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The appellant, 18 years old at the time of the incident, was accused of abducting a 16-year-old girl and attempting to commit sexual offenses.

The case originated from FIR No. 77/2024, registered on April 28, 2024, at Thoi Police Station, District Neem Ka Thana. The appellant was charged under IPC Sections 354(D) (stalking), 506 (criminal intimidation), 363 (kidnapping), 366 (abduction with intent to compel marriage), and 376 (rape), along with Sections 7/8 and 11/12 of the POCSO Act. The appellant was arrested in May 2024, and the chargesheet was filed on June 5, 2024. His bail applications were initially rejected by both the trial court and the High Court.

The appellant's counsel argued that he was only 18 at the time of the alleged offense and that the victim, 16, was involved in a consensual relationship. They emphasized that the trial would be prolonged, with 12 witnesses yet to be examined. In contrast, the State contended that the victim was a minor and denied any consensual relationship, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges.

The Supreme Court, after hearing both sides, decided to grant bail, taking into account the young age of the appellant, the prolonged trial, and the fact that the relationship was claimed to be consensual. The Court imposed strict conditions, including barring the appellant from contacting the victim or influencing witnesses.

The Supreme Court directed the trial court to release the appellant on bail, subject to specific conditions to ensure his cooperation in the trial and prevent any misuse of his liberty.

Date of Decision: October 4, 2024

Deshraj @ Musa vs State of Rajasthan

 

Similar News