Multiple NDPS Cases Without Conviction Cannot Justify Indefinite Pre-Trial Custody: Himachal Pradesh HC Grants Bail in Heroin Case Departmental Findings Based On Witnesses Discredited By Criminal Court Constitute 'No Evidence': Orissa High Court Upheld Constable's Reinstatement When Pension Rules Are Capable of More Than One Interpretation, Courts Must Lean in Favour of the Employee: MP High Court Wife Left Voluntarily — But Minor Children Cannot Be Taken Away: Madras High Court Intervenes in Habeas Corpus for Two Toddlers Where Consideration Does Not Pass in Terms of the Sale Deed, the Sale Deed Is Null and Void, a Nullity and Dead Letter in the Eyes of Law: Jharkhand High Court National Award-Winning Director's Script Was Registered Two Years Before Complainant Even Wrote His — Supreme Court Quashes Copyright Infringement Case Against 'Kahaani-2' Director IBC Clean Slate Does Not Wipe Out Right of Set-Off as Defence: Supreme Court Draws Critical Distinction Between Counterclaim and Defensive Plea GST Assessment Challenged on Natural Justice Grounds Tagged to Criminal Writ in Supreme Court Railway Cannot Escape Compensation by Crying 'Trespass' Without Eyewitness: Bombay High Court Reverses Tribunal, Awards Rs. 4 Lakh to Widow of Rolex Employee Master Plan Cannot Be Held Hostage to Subsequent Vegetation Growth — Supreme Court Settles Deemed Forest vs. Statutory Planning Conflict Contempt | Sold Property Despite Court's Restraint Order: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sentences One Month's Imprisonment Tractor-Run-Over Death Was An Accident, Not Murder: Allahabad High Court Acquits Three Accused Fast-Tracking Cannot Bury Justice: Supreme Court Sets Aside 21-Year-Delayed Appeal Decided Without Informing Convict Panchayat Act's Demolition Powers Cease Once Plot Falls Under Development Authority's Planning Area: Calcutta High Court Actual Date Of Woman Director's Appointment A Triable Issue; Prosecution Can't Be Quashed Merely On Claims Of Compliance: Calcutta High Court A Website Cannot Whisper and Then Punish: Delhi High Court Reins in DSSSB Over E-Dossier Rejections Mutual Consent Alone Ends the Marriage: Gujarat High Court Affirms Mubarat Divorce Without Formalities State Cannot Hide Behind "Oral Consent" or Delay When It Builds Roads Through Citizens' Land Without Due Process: Himachal Pradesh HC Show Cause Notice Alone Cannot Cut a Retired Engineer's Pension: Jharkhand High Court Bovine Smuggling Is a Law and Order Problem, Not a Public Order Threat: J&K High Court Quashes PSA Detention Article 22(2) Constitution | Production Beyond 24 Hours Not Fatal If Delay Explained And Travel Time Excluded: Karnataka High Court Article 227 Is Not an Appellate Power: High Court Refuses to Reassess Tribunal Findings on Pension Claim: Kerala High Court High Court Cannot Call A Complaint "False And Malicious" Without First Finding It Discloses No Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court When Jurisdiction Fails, Remand Cannot Cure It: Supreme Court Sets Aside Order Sending MSME Award Dispute Back to Functus Officio Facilitation Council Selling Inferior Pipes as 'Jain' or 'Jindal Gold' Brand Is Not Just a Civil Wrong — It's Cheating: MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Went to Collect Chit Fund Money, Got Arrested in Prostitution Raid: Telangana High Court Grants Bail to Woman Accused of Being Sub-Organiser Axe Blow During Sudden Quarrel Falls Under Exception 4 To Section 300 IPC, Not Murder: Orissa High Court Modifies Conviction To Culpable Homicide

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Teen, Emphasizes Consensual Relationship in POCSO Case Involving 16-Year-Old

08 October 2024 10:41 AM

By: sayum


Supreme Court of India granted bail to Deshraj @ Musa in Deshraj @ Musa vs State of Rajasthan (Criminal Appeal No. 11020/2024), who had been charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The appellant, 18 years old at the time of the incident, was accused of abducting a 16-year-old girl and attempting to commit sexual offenses.

The case originated from FIR No. 77/2024, registered on April 28, 2024, at Thoi Police Station, District Neem Ka Thana. The appellant was charged under IPC Sections 354(D) (stalking), 506 (criminal intimidation), 363 (kidnapping), 366 (abduction with intent to compel marriage), and 376 (rape), along with Sections 7/8 and 11/12 of the POCSO Act. The appellant was arrested in May 2024, and the chargesheet was filed on June 5, 2024. His bail applications were initially rejected by both the trial court and the High Court.

The appellant's counsel argued that he was only 18 at the time of the alleged offense and that the victim, 16, was involved in a consensual relationship. They emphasized that the trial would be prolonged, with 12 witnesses yet to be examined. In contrast, the State contended that the victim was a minor and denied any consensual relationship, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges.

The Supreme Court, after hearing both sides, decided to grant bail, taking into account the young age of the appellant, the prolonged trial, and the fact that the relationship was claimed to be consensual. The Court imposed strict conditions, including barring the appellant from contacting the victim or influencing witnesses.

The Supreme Court directed the trial court to release the appellant on bail, subject to specific conditions to ensure his cooperation in the trial and prevent any misuse of his liberty.

Date of Decision: October 4, 2024

Deshraj @ Musa vs State of Rajasthan

 

Latest Legal News