Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Vehicle Accident Case, Citing “Serious Errors” in Previous Assessments

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has enhanced the compensation awarded to a claimant in a motor vehicle accident case. The court noted “serious errors” in the assessments made by the Motor Vehicles Claims Tribunal and the High Court, leading to a lower compensation amount being awarded initially.

The appellant, Sri Lakshmana Gowda B.N., had filed an appeal challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal. The court heard arguments from both the appellant and the respondent, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., and examined the records of the case.

Justice Aravind Kumar, delivering the judgment, stated, “The Tribunal committed a serious error in awarding abysmally less compensation contrary to the evidence on record.” The court found that the assessments of the claimant’s income and permanent disability were incorrect, resulting in an unjustifiably low compensation amount.

The court awarded additional compensation for pain and suffering, stating, “The compensation awarded towards ‘pain and suffering’ is on the lower side.” They also considered the claimant’s loss of future income, loss of marriage prospects, and loss of earnings during the laid-up period, recalculating the compensation amounts for these factors.

“The Tribunal and the High Court fell in error in construing the income of the claimant at Rs. 3,000/- p.m. instead of Rs. 8,000/- p.m.,” the court emphasized, highlighting the incorrect assessment of the claimant’s income.

The final compensation awarded by the Supreme Court was Rs. 15,94,812, with interest at 6% per annum. The court directed The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. To deposit the awarded amount within six weeks.

Date of Decision:  July 7, 2023

SRI LAKSHMANA GOWDA B.N.   vs THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.  CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/07-Jul-2023-SRI-LAKSHMANA-Vs-Oriental-Insurance.pdf"]

Latest Legal News