Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petition : Warned Bar Association no impediment in the work of legal defence counsel

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India delivered its verdict in Contempt Petition (Civil) No 726 of 2023 and Writ Petition (Civil) No 420 of 2023, reinstating the petitioners and similarly situated members of the Bharatpur Bar Association. The court's decision came on July 10, 2023, with Chief Justice Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha presiding over the case.

The order, which was disposed of by the court, emphasized the importance of ensuring no obstruction for the petitioners or other members of the Bar in performing their duties as legal defense counsel. In the order, the court highlighted that "there shall be no impediment in the work of legal defense counsel" and warned that coercive action would be taken if any incidents occur in the future.

"The concerned members of the Bar are placed on notice that this Court will be constrained to take recourse to the coercive arm of law, should any incident occur in the future," the court stated in its judgment.

The court acknowledged the statements made by the counsel representing the newly elected body of the Bharatpur Bar Association and the erstwhile Association. It was confirmed that no strike was declared, and steps were not taken to prevent the petitioners or similarly situated members of the Bar from pursuing their avocation or profession.

"The statements made on behalf of the respondents-contemnors, it is not expedient in the interest of justice to pursue the exercise of the contempt jurisdiction any further," the court remarked.

The judgment, which ensures the reinstatement of the petitioners and their colleagues, brings relief to the affected members of the Bar Association. It also serves as a reminder of the court's commitment to upholding the rights of legal defense counsel and maintaining an unhindered legal system.

The Supreme Court's decision in this case holds significance for the legal fraternity and sets a precedent for the protection of the professional rights of lawyers across the country.

Date of Decision: July 10, 2023

Purnaprakash Sharma & Ors   vs Yashwant Singh Faujdar & Ors

Latest Legal News