Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petition : Warned Bar Association no impediment in the work of legal defence counsel

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India delivered its verdict in Contempt Petition (Civil) No 726 of 2023 and Writ Petition (Civil) No 420 of 2023, reinstating the petitioners and similarly situated members of the Bharatpur Bar Association. The court's decision came on July 10, 2023, with Chief Justice Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha presiding over the case.

The order, which was disposed of by the court, emphasized the importance of ensuring no obstruction for the petitioners or other members of the Bar in performing their duties as legal defense counsel. In the order, the court highlighted that "there shall be no impediment in the work of legal defense counsel" and warned that coercive action would be taken if any incidents occur in the future.

"The concerned members of the Bar are placed on notice that this Court will be constrained to take recourse to the coercive arm of law, should any incident occur in the future," the court stated in its judgment.

The court acknowledged the statements made by the counsel representing the newly elected body of the Bharatpur Bar Association and the erstwhile Association. It was confirmed that no strike was declared, and steps were not taken to prevent the petitioners or similarly situated members of the Bar from pursuing their avocation or profession.

"The statements made on behalf of the respondents-contemnors, it is not expedient in the interest of justice to pursue the exercise of the contempt jurisdiction any further," the court remarked.

The judgment, which ensures the reinstatement of the petitioners and their colleagues, brings relief to the affected members of the Bar Association. It also serves as a reminder of the court's commitment to upholding the rights of legal defense counsel and maintaining an unhindered legal system.

The Supreme Court's decision in this case holds significance for the legal fraternity and sets a precedent for the protection of the professional rights of lawyers across the country.

Date of Decision: July 10, 2023

Purnaprakash Sharma & Ors   vs Yashwant Singh Faujdar & Ors

Latest Legal News