Deputy Registrar Of Chits Competent To Act As Arbitrator And Issue Recovery Certificates; Not Limited To Registrar Alone: Telangana High Court Custody With Biological Mother Presumed Lawful; Writ Of Habeas Corpus Not A Remedy To Enforce Foreign Court’s Return Orders: Bombay High Court Ocular Testimony Of Victim Prevails Over Medical Evidence In Rape Cases If Found Credible: Allahabad High Court Condonation Of Delay Should Follow Justice-Oriented Liberal Approach, Unintentional Delay Shouldn't Block Justice: Calcutta High Court Digital Banking Fraud: Clicking Suspicious Links Constitutes Customer Negligence; Liability Cannot Be Fastened On Bank Without Forensic Evidence: Delhi High Court Vexatious Matrimonial Complaints Filed As Counterblast To Divorce Is Abuse Of Process; Allegations Against In-Laws Must Be Specific: Gujarat High Court Sale Deed Executed By Son During Father's Lifetime Based On Manipulated Records Is Void Ab Initio: Karnataka High Court Charge Sheet E-Filed After Court Hours Deemed Filed Next Day; Accused Entitled To Default Bail: Kerala High Court Landowners Can't Use Antedated Stamp Papers To Defeat Ceiling Limits; Section 22 Land Reforms Act Prevails Over Registration Act: Madras High Court Rajasthan High Court Orders Tehsildar To Personally Pay ₹2 Lakh Compensation For 53-Day Illegal Detention Despite Suspension Of Sentence Mere Existence Of Dargah Doesn't Grant Jurisdiction To Waqf Board; Statutory Survey Under Sections 4 & 5 Is Mandatory: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Sets Aside Interim Stay On Delhi Race Club Eviction; Says Courts Can't Halt Statutory Proceedings Without Recording Finding On Prima Facie Case

Supreme Court Disposes of Contempt Petition : Warned Bar Association no impediment in the work of legal defence counsel

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India delivered its verdict in Contempt Petition (Civil) No 726 of 2023 and Writ Petition (Civil) No 420 of 2023, reinstating the petitioners and similarly situated members of the Bharatpur Bar Association. The court's decision came on July 10, 2023, with Chief Justice Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha presiding over the case.

The order, which was disposed of by the court, emphasized the importance of ensuring no obstruction for the petitioners or other members of the Bar in performing their duties as legal defense counsel. In the order, the court highlighted that "there shall be no impediment in the work of legal defense counsel" and warned that coercive action would be taken if any incidents occur in the future.

"The concerned members of the Bar are placed on notice that this Court will be constrained to take recourse to the coercive arm of law, should any incident occur in the future," the court stated in its judgment.

The court acknowledged the statements made by the counsel representing the newly elected body of the Bharatpur Bar Association and the erstwhile Association. It was confirmed that no strike was declared, and steps were not taken to prevent the petitioners or similarly situated members of the Bar from pursuing their avocation or profession.

"The statements made on behalf of the respondents-contemnors, it is not expedient in the interest of justice to pursue the exercise of the contempt jurisdiction any further," the court remarked.

The judgment, which ensures the reinstatement of the petitioners and their colleagues, brings relief to the affected members of the Bar Association. It also serves as a reminder of the court's commitment to upholding the rights of legal defense counsel and maintaining an unhindered legal system.

The Supreme Court's decision in this case holds significance for the legal fraternity and sets a precedent for the protection of the professional rights of lawyers across the country.

Date of Decision: July 10, 2023

Purnaprakash Sharma & Ors   vs Yashwant Singh Faujdar & Ors

Latest Legal News