Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

"Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petitions, Upholds High Court's Decision to Grant Bail: 'The Interest of Justice Must Be Preserved'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India dismissed the Special Leave Petitions filed by both the victim and the State/Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The petitions challenged the Calcutta High Court's decision to grant bail to multiple accused in a criminal case involving serious offences under the Indian Penal Code.

Justice VIKRAM NATH and Justice AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH presided over the case and delivered the judgment. The Court stated, "The interest of justice must be preserved," thereby upholding the High Court's decision but imposing additional conditions on the accused.

The Calcutta High Court had granted bail to the accused for offences under Sections 376(D), 228A, 506, and 120B of the IPC. The High Court's decision was primarily based on the ground of parity as bail had been granted to the main accused, Jitendra Narain.

The Supreme Court agreed with the High Court's ultimate decision to grant bail but for entirely different reasons. "We do not find reason to interfere with the Impugned Judgments," the Court observed. However, it imposed additional conditions on the accused, including expeditious proceedings by the Trial Court and full cooperation from the accused during the trial.

The Court emphasized the importance of the victim's safety, stating, "The onus of ensuring their safety is on the Union Territory Administration." The Director-General of Police was directed to examine the victim's subsequent complaints and take appropriate action within ten days.

The Court referred to previous judgments outlining the factors to be considered while granting or refusing bail. These include the nature of the accusation, severity of the punishment, and the likelihood of the accused absconding.

The Special Leave Petitions were dismissed, and any pending applications were disposed of. The Court's decision serves as a significant precedent in cases involving the grant of bail for serious offences.

Date of Decision: August 24, 2023

XXX  vs UNION TERRITORY OF ANDAMAN  & NICOBAR ISLANDS & ANR. 

Latest Legal News