Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

"Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petitions, Upholds High Court's Decision to Grant Bail: 'The Interest of Justice Must Be Preserved'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India dismissed the Special Leave Petitions filed by both the victim and the State/Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The petitions challenged the Calcutta High Court's decision to grant bail to multiple accused in a criminal case involving serious offences under the Indian Penal Code.

Justice VIKRAM NATH and Justice AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH presided over the case and delivered the judgment. The Court stated, "The interest of justice must be preserved," thereby upholding the High Court's decision but imposing additional conditions on the accused.

The Calcutta High Court had granted bail to the accused for offences under Sections 376(D), 228A, 506, and 120B of the IPC. The High Court's decision was primarily based on the ground of parity as bail had been granted to the main accused, Jitendra Narain.

The Supreme Court agreed with the High Court's ultimate decision to grant bail but for entirely different reasons. "We do not find reason to interfere with the Impugned Judgments," the Court observed. However, it imposed additional conditions on the accused, including expeditious proceedings by the Trial Court and full cooperation from the accused during the trial.

The Court emphasized the importance of the victim's safety, stating, "The onus of ensuring their safety is on the Union Territory Administration." The Director-General of Police was directed to examine the victim's subsequent complaints and take appropriate action within ten days.

The Court referred to previous judgments outlining the factors to be considered while granting or refusing bail. These include the nature of the accusation, severity of the punishment, and the likelihood of the accused absconding.

The Special Leave Petitions were dismissed, and any pending applications were disposed of. The Court's decision serves as a significant precedent in cases involving the grant of bail for serious offences.

Date of Decision: August 24, 2023

XXX  vs UNION TERRITORY OF ANDAMAN  & NICOBAR ISLANDS & ANR. 

Latest Legal News