Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal, Upholds High Court's Order in Promotion Reversion Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Supreme Court of India has dismissed an appeal and upheld the order passed by the High Court in a promotion reversion case. The judgment, delivered by Justice Rajesh Bindal, brings clarity to the dispute between Manoj Kumar Jindal and Rajni Mahajan & Ors. In a crucial quote from the judgment, Justice Bindal stated, "Any order passed at this stage may affect a number of persons and further result in unsettling many positions which have already settled with the lapse of time."

The case revolved around the reversion of Rajni Mahajan, who was initially promoted to the position of senior lecturer but later reverted back to the post of lecturer through an order issued on November 8, 2007. The High Court's Single Bench had set aside the reversion order, and this decision was subsequently upheld by the Division Bench.

Respondent No. 1, Rajni Mahajan, had been promoted as a senior lecturer in May 2007. However, the reversion order was passed without providing her with an opportunity to file a detailed reply. The court found that this action violated the principles of natural justice.

Furthermore, the judgment highlighted that the promotion of Rajni Mahajan had been recommended by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) and that she had the requisite benchmark at the time of her promotion. The appellant failed to establish that she lacked the necessary benchmark when the promotion was granted.

Considering the passage of more than 15 years since Rajni Mahajan's promotion and the potential disruption to settled positions, the court deemed it inappropriate to interfere at this stage. The judgment emphasized the potential impact on numerous individuals and the risk of unsettling previously established positions.

While allegations of malafide were raised, the court did not find direct evidence to support them. The dismissal of the appeal signifies the court's agreement with the High Court's decision and concludes the legal battle in this matter.

Date of Decision: 14th March 2023    

Manoj Kumar Jindal VS Rajni Mahajan & Ors.         

            

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/14-Mar-2023-Manoj-Vs-Rajni-NON.pdf"]

Latest Legal News