"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking De-sealing of Property

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court of India has dismissed Civil Appeal Nos. 4538-4539 of 2023 and Writ Petition (Civil) No. 692 of 2023, upholding the order of the Delhi High Court. The appeals were filed by the legal representatives of the deceased Ram Kishan, challenging the High Court's orders dated 11.11.2021 and 10.04.2023 in CM (M) No.998 of 2021 and CM (M) No.1089 of 2022, respectively. The Writ Petition sought a writ of mandamus to de-seal a property in Delhi Cantt, but the Supreme Court denied the prayer, asserting that the building plan had not been sanctioned.

The crux of the matter revolved around the jurisdiction of the Delhi Cantonment Board (DCB) and the approval of the building plan. The appellant had contended that a previous order of the Supreme Court in Praveen Kumar v. Delhi Cantonment Board & Ors. barred the Civil Suit No.759 of 2018 filed by the respondents. However, the Supreme Court noted that the appellant had accepted DCB's jurisdiction and was in the process of constructing the property after obtaining due sanction, making the previous order inapplicable.

Regarding the de-sealing issue, the Court emphasized that the appellant's prayer was contingent on the approval of the building plan. As the building plan had not been sanctioned, the Court found no legal basis to grant the writ of mandamus for de-sealing the property. Moreover, the Court stated that the issue of de-sealing was interconnected with the pending Civil Suit, further diminishing the petitioner's claim.

In delivering the judgment, Justice C.T. Ravikumar and Justice Sanjay Kumar observed, "We find no infirmity or illegality in the High Court's orders. The prayer for de-sealing cannot be granted at this stage, as it hinges on the approval of the building plan, which has not been sanctioned."

With the Supreme Court's dismissal, the property will remain sealed until the necessary approvals are obtained, and the Civil Suit No.759 of 2018 will proceed in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations.

The judgment serves as a significant legal precedent concerning jurisdictional matters and the requisites for seeking de-sealing orders, setting the stage for future cases involving similar disputes.

 

Date of Decision: July 24, 2023

Ram Kishan (Deceased) through  Legal Representatives & Anr.  vs Manish Kumar & Anr.       

Similar News