Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

"Supreme Court Directs State to Consider Appointment of Constable, Says 'No Suppression of Material Information'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India has directed the State of West Bengal to consider the appointment of a respondent as a constable in the West Bengal Police Force. The Court stated that there was "no suppression of material information" by the respondent, thereby overturning the State's argument against his appointment.

The Bench, consisting of Justices J.K. Maheshwari and K.V. Viswanathan, delivered the judgment earlier today. The case revolved around the State's appeal against a High Court judgment that had initially directed the appointment of the respondent.

The Supreme Court observed that the verification roll used for the recruitment process was "vague" and did not specifically ask about pending criminal cases. "The respondent had answered 'No' to a question about being 'arrested, detained, or convicted,' which the Court deemed appropriate given the phrasing of the question," the judgment read.

Further, the Court noted that the respondent was acquitted in a criminal case that "did not involve heinous or serious offences or moral turpitude." The Court stated, "The prosecution had failed to prove the charges against the respondent."

In its decision, the Court also referred to the case of "Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and Others, (2016) 8 SCC 471" to emphasize the guidelines for dealing with suppression of information and the effect of conviction/acquittal on employment.

The Supreme Court modified the High Court's order and directed the State to consider the respondent's case for appointment within four weeks. However, the Court clarified that the respondent would only be entitled to "notional benefits," including continuity in service and pay fixation, but not salary and back wages until the date of his appointment.

Date of Decision: 22 August 2023

State of West Bengal & Ors. vs Mitul Kumar Jana       

Latest Legal News