Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Disbursement of Employees' Dues in Sugar Factory Liquidation Case

04 September 2024 9:48 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has issued an order directing the disbursement of employees' dues in a case related to the liquidation of a sugar factory. The court, comprising Justices M.R. Shah and Krishna Murari, emphasized the bank's liability to pay salary/wage dues while assigning the responsibility of other statutory dues to the subsequent purchaser. The order aims to ensure the rightful distribution of funds to the concerned employees or their legal heirs, providing much-needed relief after a long legal battle.

The apex court stated, "The amount due and payable towards the wages/salaries of the concerned employees of the sugar factory in liquidation shall have to be paid to them and/or to their legal heirs out of the deposited amount." It further stressed the importance of thorough verification and identification of the claims to ensure the funds reach the rightful recipients. Additionally, the court set a deadline of December 31, 2023, for the disbursement process to be completed.

The judgment also highlighted the bank's request to transfer the deposited amount, along with accrued interest, to the account of the Collector, Bhandara. This move will enable the Collector to oversee the distribution of funds to the employees or their legal heirs on a proportional basis. The court further directed the Collector to disburse the respective employees' dues directly into their bank accounts, along with 7.5% interest.

Justice M.R. Shah, in the ruling, emphasized the transparency and integrity of the process, stating, "The disbursement to the concerned employees/legal heirs of the employees of the sugar factory in liquidation shall be done in the utmost transparent manner and with proper identification and verification of the claims."

The Supreme Court's decision brings hope to the employees of the sugar factory, who have been awaiting their rightful dues for a considerable period. The order ensures that the bank fulfills its obligation to pay salary/wage dues, while any remaining balance after disbursement will be utilized towards settling the bank's dues.

This ruling marks a significant step towards justice for the employees, providing a fair resolution in the complex matter of the sugar factory liquidation. With the Supreme Court's intervention, the affected employees can finally see the light at the end of the tunnel as they await the disbursement of their long-overdue dues.

DECISION: March 24, 2023

The Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd.  VS Babulal Lade & Ors. 

Latest Legal News