Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Unarmed Witnesses’ Inaction Against Armed Assailants Justified By Instinct Of Self-Preservation; Testimony Cannot Be Discarded: Allahabad High Court Ocular Evidence Outweighs Motive: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based On Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Arrest Illegal If Written 'Grounds Of Arrest' Not Furnished To Accused; Communication Of Mere 'Reasons' Insufficient: Bombay High Court Absence Of Territorial Jurisdiction No Ground To Quash FIR At Threshold If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Calcutta High Court Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua Non For PC Act Conviction; Voice Recordings Inadmissible Without Sec 65-B Certificate: Chhattisgarh HC Section 91 IEA | Disposition Of Immovable Property Cannot Be Proved By Oral Evidence If Written Document Not Produced: Delhi High Court NRC Legacy Data Extracts Inadmissible Without Section 65B Certificate; PAN Card & EPIC Not Proof Of Citizenship: Gauhati High Court Testimony Of Injured Witness Entitled To Great Weight; Minor Contradictions Due To Lapse Of Memory Cannot Discard Prosecution Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Kerala High Court Remands Teacher Seniority Dispute For Fresh Consideration To Verify If Senior Teacher Relinquished Promotion Claim Receipt Of DNA Report After Testimony Doesn't Automatically Confer Right To Recall Witness For Further Cross-Examination: Madhya Pradesh High Court Possession Of 'Bhang' Not An Offence Under NDPS Act, Specific Definition Excludes It: Jharkhand High Court Acquits Man Trial Court Cannot Reject Request For Handwriting Expert Merely Because Signatures Are On Photocopies: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court deprecates attempt to indulge in Forum Shopping and Bench Hunting

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India has rejected a request for recusal made by Sanjiv Kumar Rajendrabhai Bhatt, the petitioner in SLP (Crl.) No. 9445 of 2022, in a order passed on May 10, 2023. The petitioner had requested that one of the judges recuse themselves from the matter due to a previous stricture made against the petitioner's conduct on delaying tactics adopted by them in a related matter in 2011.

 The order was passed by a bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar, who heard arguments from the petitioner's counsel, Shri Devadatt Kamat, and the respondents' counsels, Shri Maninder Singh and Shri A.N.S. Nadkarni.

 The Court noted that the petitioner had not raised this objection earlier in the present matter and that the request lacked bona fide and seemed to be made with mala fide intention to avoid the Bench for no valid reason. The Court stated that the observations made by the High Court against the petitioner's conduct in the past could not be a ground to accede to the request made by the petitioner. The Court also strongly deprecated the attempt to indulge in Forum Shopping and Bench Hunting.

 The Court's decision has implications for the legal practice in India, as recusal requests can be a common tactic used by parties to try and influence the outcome of a case. The Court's rejection of the request in this case sends a message that such requests should be made with genuine reasons and not as a means to avoid a particular Bench or judge.

 It is worth noting that the order is non-reportable, meaning that it cannot be used as a precedent or cited in future cases. However, it provides an insight into the Court's reasoning on the matter and the factors that were considered in reaching the decision.

Date of Order:* May 10, 2023

Sanjiv Kumar Rajendrabhai Bhatt vs State of Gujarat & Anr.           

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/10-May-2023-Sanjeev-vs-state-Non.pdf"]

Latest Legal News