High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

Supreme Court deprecates attempt to indulge in Forum Shopping and Bench Hunting

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India has rejected a request for recusal made by Sanjiv Kumar Rajendrabhai Bhatt, the petitioner in SLP (Crl.) No. 9445 of 2022, in a order passed on May 10, 2023. The petitioner had requested that one of the judges recuse themselves from the matter due to a previous stricture made against the petitioner's conduct on delaying tactics adopted by them in a related matter in 2011.

 The order was passed by a bench comprising Justices M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar, who heard arguments from the petitioner's counsel, Shri Devadatt Kamat, and the respondents' counsels, Shri Maninder Singh and Shri A.N.S. Nadkarni.

 The Court noted that the petitioner had not raised this objection earlier in the present matter and that the request lacked bona fide and seemed to be made with mala fide intention to avoid the Bench for no valid reason. The Court stated that the observations made by the High Court against the petitioner's conduct in the past could not be a ground to accede to the request made by the petitioner. The Court also strongly deprecated the attempt to indulge in Forum Shopping and Bench Hunting.

 The Court's decision has implications for the legal practice in India, as recusal requests can be a common tactic used by parties to try and influence the outcome of a case. The Court's rejection of the request in this case sends a message that such requests should be made with genuine reasons and not as a means to avoid a particular Bench or judge.

 It is worth noting that the order is non-reportable, meaning that it cannot be used as a precedent or cited in future cases. However, it provides an insight into the Court's reasoning on the matter and the factors that were considered in reaching the decision.

Date of Order:* May 10, 2023

Sanjiv Kumar Rajendrabhai Bhatt vs State of Gujarat & Anr.           

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/10-May-2023-Sanjeev-vs-state-Non.pdf"]

Latest Legal News