Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Criticizes Hyper-Technical Approach, Orders Further Investigation in DSP Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has criticized a hyper-technical approach taken by the High Court and ordered further investigation into the murder of a Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP). The case involves the widow of the deceased DSP, Parveen Azad, seeking justice for her husband's murder, which occurred in a violent incident on March 2, 2013, in village Balipur, district Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh.

The order issued by the Supreme Court, on September 26, 2023, stems from a special leave petition (SLP) filed by Parveen Azad, challenging the High Court's decision to invalidate a directive from a Special Magistrate. The Special Magistrate had ordered further investigation into the case, citing irregularities in the initial investigation.

In its observations, the Supreme Court stated, "The High Court took a hyper-technical approach in the matter, making superfine distinction between re-investigation and further investigation. There does not appear to be any error on the part of the learned Special Magistrate in directing further investigation." The Court went on to set aside the High Court's order and upheld the Special Magistrate's directive for further investigation.

The case revolves around allegations made by Parveen Azad, who named several individuals as involved or complicit in her husband's murder. She also raised concerns about the police team abandoning her husband during the attack. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had submitted a charge sheet against several accused, but Azad's grievance was about the exoneration of five individuals she had named in her complaint.

The Supreme Court's decision directs the completion of further investigation within a period of three months and allows the trial proceedings to continue. It also emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive and unbiased investigation in cases of this nature.

This ruling is seen as a significant step towards ensuring justice in a high-profile case that has been closely watched by legal experts and the public. The Court's decision underscores the need for a fair and thorough investigation, irrespective of the circumstances, to uphold the principles of justice and rule of law.

DATE OF DECISION: September 26, 2023

PARVEEN AZAD vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Parveen_Azad_vs_Central_Bureau_Of_Investigation_on_26_September_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News