CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Converts Conviction to Culpable Homicide - Granted Benefit of Doubt

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India modified the conviction and sentence of the appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 1863 of 2010, granting them the benefit of doubt. The judgment, delivered by Justices B.R. Gavai and M.M. Sundresh, stated, "We find that the appellants are entitled to benefit of doubt in view of Exception I of Section 300 of the Jammu and Kashmir State Ranbir Penal Code."

The case revolved around an incident where the appellants were accused of assaulting and causing the death of two individuals who were forcibly detained in their house. The victims ultimately succumbed to their injuries, leading to charges being framed against the appellants.

The prosecution relied heavily on the dying declaration of one of the deceased victims, along with the testimonies of witnesses. However, the Supreme Court noted contradictions in the dying declaration and the testimonies, as well as the failure of the prosecution to explain injuries sustained by one of the accused.

Considering the right of private defense claimed by the appellants, the court concluded that the possibility of the appellants acting in self-defense could not be ruled out. The judgment further stated, "We find that the appellants are entitled to benefit of doubt in view of Exception I of Section 300 of the RPC."

As a result, the conviction and sentence of the appellants under Section 302 of the RPC were converted to the one under Part-I of Section 304. The appellants had already served a sentence of approximately ten years, leading the court to determine that the sentence already undergone was sufficient.

Supreme Court allowed their appeal, modifying the conviction and sentence. The bail bonds of the appellants were ordered to be discharged.

Supreme Court highlights the importance of considering all aspects of a case, including self-defense claims and the benefit of doubt, in reaching a just decision. The ruling sets a significant precedent in criminal cases involving allegations of assault and highlights the need for a thorough examination of evidence to ensure fairness and justice.

Date of Decision: January 12, 2023

MOHINDER PAL AND OTHERS  vs STATE OF J & K

Latest Legal News