Bail | Right to Speedy Trial is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21: PH High Court    |     Postal Department’s Power to Enhance Penalties Time-Barred, Rules Allahabad High Court    |     Tenants Cannot Cross-Examine Landlords Unless Relationship is Disputed: Madras High Court    |     NDPS | Conscious Possession Extends to Vehicle Drivers: Telangana High Court Upholds 10-Year Sentence in Ganja Trafficking Case    |     Aid Reduction Of Without Due Process Unlawful: Rajasthan High Court Restores Full Grants for Educational Institutions    |     Assessment of Notional Income in Absence of Proof Cannot Be 'Mathematically Precise,' Says Patna High Court    |     NCLT's Resolution Plan Overrides State Tax Claims: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Demands Against Patanjali Foods    |     An Agreement is Not Voidable if the Party Could Discover the Truth with Ordinary Diligence: Calcutta High Court Quashes Termination of LPG Distributorship License    |     Independent Witnesses Contradict Prosecution's Story: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquit Accused in Arson Case    |     Merely Being a Joint Account Holder Does Not Attract Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act:  Gujarat High Court    |     Higher Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perversity is Found: Himachal Pradesh High Court Refused to Enhance Maintenance    |     Perpetual Lease Allows Division of Property: Delhi High Court Affirms Partition and Validity of Purdah Wall    |     "Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Videography in Temple Premises Limited to Religious Functions: Kerala High Court Orders to Restrict Non-Religious Activities on Temple Premises    |     Past Service Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Affirms Pension Rights for Daily Wage Employees    |     'Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ Does Not Mean Beyond All Doubt: Madras High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Man Convicted of Murdering Mother-in-Law    |    

"Supreme Court Clarifies 'Basic Wage' Definition, Dismisses Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner's Appeal"

04 September 2024 11:13 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India dismissed an appeal filed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, terming it "meritless." The case, which had been closely watched by legal experts and employers alike, centered on the definition of 'basic wage' for provident fund contributions.

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner had appealed against a judgment dated July 20, 2011, by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The original issue stemmed from an order dated June 15, 2009, by the Appellate Tribunal under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF Act).

The appellant argued that M/S G4S Security Services (India) Ltd. & ANR were "wrongly splitting the wage structure of the employees and treating the reduced wage as the basic wage, thereby evading its liability to contribute the correct amount towards the provident fund."

The Court, however, was unequivocal in its stance. It stated, "In our opinion, once the EPF Act contains a specific provision defining the words 'basic wage' (under Section 2b), then there was no occasion for the appellant to expect the Court to have traveled to the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, to give it a different connotation or an expansive one, as sought to be urged. Clearly, that was not the intention of the legislature."

This judgment is significant as it clarifies the legal framework around provident fund contributions and sets a precedent for how 'basic wage' should be defined under the EPF Act. Employers and employees across sectors will likely be impacted by this clarification.

The Court also noted that a similar issue had been considered and accepted by the appellant department in the past, further emphasizing the lack of merit in the current appeal.

With this judgment, the Supreme Court has put to rest ambiguities surrounding the definition of 'basic wage' for provident fund contributions, thereby impacting the landscape of employment law in India.

Date of Decision: August 17, 2023

ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER vs M/S G4S SECURITY SERVICES (INDIA) LTD. & ANR

Similar News