Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Domestic Violence Case to Uttar Pradesh, Citing Valid Grounds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India has granted approval for the transfer of a case filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, from the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Indore to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh. The case, titled “Archana & Ors. Vs. Jasveer Singh & Ors.,” has been at the center of a legal battle, with the petitioners seeking the transfer on the grounds of malafide proceedings and the involvement of multiple family members from the husband’s side.

During the hearing, the Court took note of the respondents’ absence, with respondent No.1 failing to appear on both occasions, and respondents 2 and 3 not making an appearance despite the service of a show-cause notice. This led the Court to proceed with the case based on the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners.

In its order, the Court emphasized that there were no averments in the complaint regarding the cause of action within the district of Indore and that the respondents resided in Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh, as per the address provided in the complaint. Taking these factors into consideration, the Court expressed satisfaction with the grounds urged by the petitioners and accepted the request for transfer.

The Bench comprising of Hon’ble Justice Vikram Nath and Hon’ble Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah remarked, “We have considered the facts of the case and grounds on which transfer has been sought. On such consideration, we are satisfied with the grounds urged by the petitioners and accept the same. Therefore, proceedings being M.J.C.R. No.1904 of 2022 titled ‘Archana & Ors. Vs. Jasveer Singh & Ors.’ Pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Indore is ordered to be transferred to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh.”

The Court further directed the Court at Indore to promptly and without any delay send the case record to the Family Court in Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh. With the transfer petition allowed, the Court also disposed of any pending applications related to the case.

The verdict signifies the Court’s commitment to ensuring that justice is delivered in a fair and expeditious manner, especially in cases involving the protection of women from domestic violence. By allowing the transfer of the case to the appropriate jurisdiction, the Supreme Court has upheld the principles of convenience and justice, ensuring that the case will now be heard in the most suitable forum.

The order has set a precedent for similar cases seeking transfers based on valid grounds, emphasizing the importance of considering the practical aspects and equitable distribution of legal proceedings in ensuring fair access to justice for all citizens.

DATE OF DECISION: July 19, 2023

JASVEER SINGH & ORS.  vs ARCHANA & ORS. 

 

Latest Legal News