Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Domestic Violence Case to Uttar Pradesh, Citing Valid Grounds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India has granted approval for the transfer of a case filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, from the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Indore to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh. The case, titled “Archana & Ors. Vs. Jasveer Singh & Ors.,” has been at the center of a legal battle, with the petitioners seeking the transfer on the grounds of malafide proceedings and the involvement of multiple family members from the husband’s side.

During the hearing, the Court took note of the respondents’ absence, with respondent No.1 failing to appear on both occasions, and respondents 2 and 3 not making an appearance despite the service of a show-cause notice. This led the Court to proceed with the case based on the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners.

In its order, the Court emphasized that there were no averments in the complaint regarding the cause of action within the district of Indore and that the respondents resided in Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh, as per the address provided in the complaint. Taking these factors into consideration, the Court expressed satisfaction with the grounds urged by the petitioners and accepted the request for transfer.

The Bench comprising of Hon’ble Justice Vikram Nath and Hon’ble Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah remarked, “We have considered the facts of the case and grounds on which transfer has been sought. On such consideration, we are satisfied with the grounds urged by the petitioners and accept the same. Therefore, proceedings being M.J.C.R. No.1904 of 2022 titled ‘Archana & Ors. Vs. Jasveer Singh & Ors.’ Pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Indore is ordered to be transferred to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh.”

The Court further directed the Court at Indore to promptly and without any delay send the case record to the Family Court in Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh. With the transfer petition allowed, the Court also disposed of any pending applications related to the case.

The verdict signifies the Court’s commitment to ensuring that justice is delivered in a fair and expeditious manner, especially in cases involving the protection of women from domestic violence. By allowing the transfer of the case to the appropriate jurisdiction, the Supreme Court has upheld the principles of convenience and justice, ensuring that the case will now be heard in the most suitable forum.

The order has set a precedent for similar cases seeking transfers based on valid grounds, emphasizing the importance of considering the practical aspects and equitable distribution of legal proceedings in ensuring fair access to justice for all citizens.

DATE OF DECISION: July 19, 2023

JASVEER SINGH & ORS.  vs ARCHANA & ORS. 

 

Similar News