Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Supreme Court Allows Transfer of Domestic Violence Case to Uttar Pradesh, Citing Valid Grounds

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India has granted approval for the transfer of a case filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, from the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Indore to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh. The case, titled “Archana & Ors. Vs. Jasveer Singh & Ors.,” has been at the center of a legal battle, with the petitioners seeking the transfer on the grounds of malafide proceedings and the involvement of multiple family members from the husband’s side.

During the hearing, the Court took note of the respondents’ absence, with respondent No.1 failing to appear on both occasions, and respondents 2 and 3 not making an appearance despite the service of a show-cause notice. This led the Court to proceed with the case based on the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners.

In its order, the Court emphasized that there were no averments in the complaint regarding the cause of action within the district of Indore and that the respondents resided in Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh, as per the address provided in the complaint. Taking these factors into consideration, the Court expressed satisfaction with the grounds urged by the petitioners and accepted the request for transfer.

The Bench comprising of Hon’ble Justice Vikram Nath and Hon’ble Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah remarked, “We have considered the facts of the case and grounds on which transfer has been sought. On such consideration, we are satisfied with the grounds urged by the petitioners and accept the same. Therefore, proceedings being M.J.C.R. No.1904 of 2022 titled ‘Archana & Ors. Vs. Jasveer Singh & Ors.’ Pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class at Indore is ordered to be transferred to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh.”

The Court further directed the Court at Indore to promptly and without any delay send the case record to the Family Court in Auraiya, Uttar Pradesh. With the transfer petition allowed, the Court also disposed of any pending applications related to the case.

The verdict signifies the Court’s commitment to ensuring that justice is delivered in a fair and expeditious manner, especially in cases involving the protection of women from domestic violence. By allowing the transfer of the case to the appropriate jurisdiction, the Supreme Court has upheld the principles of convenience and justice, ensuring that the case will now be heard in the most suitable forum.

The order has set a precedent for similar cases seeking transfers based on valid grounds, emphasizing the importance of considering the practical aspects and equitable distribution of legal proceedings in ensuring fair access to justice for all citizens.

DATE OF DECISION: July 19, 2023

JASVEER SINGH & ORS.  vs ARCHANA & ORS. 

 

Latest Legal News