Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

Supreme Court Allows Continued Operation of Tamil Nadu Power Plant in Public Interest: Compliance with Conditions Emphasized

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has permitted the continued operation of the M/s IL&FS Tamil Nadu Power Company Limited's thermal power plant in Tamil Nadu. The judgment, delivered by Justice M.R. Shah, emphasizes the importance of compliance with the conditions imposed in the Environmental Clearance (EC) and a subsequent corrigendum.

The headline quotes from the judgment highlight the significant decision made by the Supreme Court. It underscores the court's recognition of the public interest involved in the power plant's continued operation. The judgment acknowledges the power deficit situation in Tamil Nadu and the adverse consequences that would arise from closing the plant, which currently supplies power to approximately 40 lakh households.

The court acknowledged the appellant's compliance with the clearance conditions and the submission of six-monthly reports to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF). The power plant employs imported coal with low sulfur content and has a Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) system in place, ensuring compliance with SO2 standards. The court recognized the substantial investment made by the appellant, amounting to Rs. 775 crores, for the installation of the FGD system.

Furthermore, the court considered the appellant's affiliation with the IL&FS Group, which is undergoing restructuring. It highlighted the value realization and recovery of public sector undertaking (PSU) debt as being in the larger public interest. The appellant's corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, including the adoption of several villages in the surrounding areas, were also mentioned.

Regarding the maintainability of the appeal, the court ruled that an appeal against the corrigendum to the EC would be permissible if the original EC was not under challenge or had been confirmed earlier by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on certain conditions. The scope of the appeal was limited to the corrigendum and the additional conditions imposed.

While permitting the continued operation of the power plant, the court emphasized the importance of full compliance with the conditions mentioned in the EC and the corrigendum. It noted that there were no fundamental breaches or non-compliance, but certain conditions required further compliance within the stipulated time. The court's order reflects the commitment to ensuring environmental standards are met while allowing the power plant to continue operating.

Date of Decision: February 17, 2023

M/s IL&FS Tamil Nadu Power Company Limited vs Muruganandam & Others

Similar News