Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Supreme Court Allows Continued Operation of Tamil Nadu Power Plant in Public Interest: Compliance with Conditions Emphasized

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has permitted the continued operation of the M/s IL&FS Tamil Nadu Power Company Limited's thermal power plant in Tamil Nadu. The judgment, delivered by Justice M.R. Shah, emphasizes the importance of compliance with the conditions imposed in the Environmental Clearance (EC) and a subsequent corrigendum.

The headline quotes from the judgment highlight the significant decision made by the Supreme Court. It underscores the court's recognition of the public interest involved in the power plant's continued operation. The judgment acknowledges the power deficit situation in Tamil Nadu and the adverse consequences that would arise from closing the plant, which currently supplies power to approximately 40 lakh households.

The court acknowledged the appellant's compliance with the clearance conditions and the submission of six-monthly reports to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF). The power plant employs imported coal with low sulfur content and has a Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) system in place, ensuring compliance with SO2 standards. The court recognized the substantial investment made by the appellant, amounting to Rs. 775 crores, for the installation of the FGD system.

Furthermore, the court considered the appellant's affiliation with the IL&FS Group, which is undergoing restructuring. It highlighted the value realization and recovery of public sector undertaking (PSU) debt as being in the larger public interest. The appellant's corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, including the adoption of several villages in the surrounding areas, were also mentioned.

Regarding the maintainability of the appeal, the court ruled that an appeal against the corrigendum to the EC would be permissible if the original EC was not under challenge or had been confirmed earlier by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on certain conditions. The scope of the appeal was limited to the corrigendum and the additional conditions imposed.

While permitting the continued operation of the power plant, the court emphasized the importance of full compliance with the conditions mentioned in the EC and the corrigendum. It noted that there were no fundamental breaches or non-compliance, but certain conditions required further compliance within the stipulated time. The court's order reflects the commitment to ensuring environmental standards are met while allowing the power plant to continue operating.

Date of Decision: February 17, 2023

M/s IL&FS Tamil Nadu Power Company Limited vs Muruganandam & Others

Latest Legal News