Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Continued Operation of Tamil Nadu Power Plant in Public Interest: Compliance with Conditions Emphasized

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has permitted the continued operation of the M/s IL&FS Tamil Nadu Power Company Limited's thermal power plant in Tamil Nadu. The judgment, delivered by Justice M.R. Shah, emphasizes the importance of compliance with the conditions imposed in the Environmental Clearance (EC) and a subsequent corrigendum.

The headline quotes from the judgment highlight the significant decision made by the Supreme Court. It underscores the court's recognition of the public interest involved in the power plant's continued operation. The judgment acknowledges the power deficit situation in Tamil Nadu and the adverse consequences that would arise from closing the plant, which currently supplies power to approximately 40 lakh households.

The court acknowledged the appellant's compliance with the clearance conditions and the submission of six-monthly reports to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF). The power plant employs imported coal with low sulfur content and has a Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) system in place, ensuring compliance with SO2 standards. The court recognized the substantial investment made by the appellant, amounting to Rs. 775 crores, for the installation of the FGD system.

Furthermore, the court considered the appellant's affiliation with the IL&FS Group, which is undergoing restructuring. It highlighted the value realization and recovery of public sector undertaking (PSU) debt as being in the larger public interest. The appellant's corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, including the adoption of several villages in the surrounding areas, were also mentioned.

Regarding the maintainability of the appeal, the court ruled that an appeal against the corrigendum to the EC would be permissible if the original EC was not under challenge or had been confirmed earlier by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on certain conditions. The scope of the appeal was limited to the corrigendum and the additional conditions imposed.

While permitting the continued operation of the power plant, the court emphasized the importance of full compliance with the conditions mentioned in the EC and the corrigendum. It noted that there were no fundamental breaches or non-compliance, but certain conditions required further compliance within the stipulated time. The court's order reflects the commitment to ensuring environmental standards are met while allowing the power plant to continue operating.

Date of Decision: February 17, 2023

M/s IL&FS Tamil Nadu Power Company Limited vs Muruganandam & Others

Latest Legal News