Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Allows Continued Operation of Tamil Nadu Power Plant in Public Interest: Compliance with Conditions Emphasized

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has permitted the continued operation of the M/s IL&FS Tamil Nadu Power Company Limited's thermal power plant in Tamil Nadu. The judgment, delivered by Justice M.R. Shah, emphasizes the importance of compliance with the conditions imposed in the Environmental Clearance (EC) and a subsequent corrigendum.

The headline quotes from the judgment highlight the significant decision made by the Supreme Court. It underscores the court's recognition of the public interest involved in the power plant's continued operation. The judgment acknowledges the power deficit situation in Tamil Nadu and the adverse consequences that would arise from closing the plant, which currently supplies power to approximately 40 lakh households.

The court acknowledged the appellant's compliance with the clearance conditions and the submission of six-monthly reports to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF). The power plant employs imported coal with low sulfur content and has a Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) system in place, ensuring compliance with SO2 standards. The court recognized the substantial investment made by the appellant, amounting to Rs. 775 crores, for the installation of the FGD system.

Furthermore, the court considered the appellant's affiliation with the IL&FS Group, which is undergoing restructuring. It highlighted the value realization and recovery of public sector undertaking (PSU) debt as being in the larger public interest. The appellant's corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, including the adoption of several villages in the surrounding areas, were also mentioned.

Regarding the maintainability of the appeal, the court ruled that an appeal against the corrigendum to the EC would be permissible if the original EC was not under challenge or had been confirmed earlier by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on certain conditions. The scope of the appeal was limited to the corrigendum and the additional conditions imposed.

While permitting the continued operation of the power plant, the court emphasized the importance of full compliance with the conditions mentioned in the EC and the corrigendum. It noted that there were no fundamental breaches or non-compliance, but certain conditions required further compliance within the stipulated time. The court's order reflects the commitment to ensuring environmental standards are met while allowing the power plant to continue operating.

Date of Decision: February 17, 2023

M/s IL&FS Tamil Nadu Power Company Limited vs Muruganandam & Others

Latest Legal News