Benefit Of Acquittal Can Be Extended To Non-Appealing Co-Accused If Prosecution Case Is Found To Be Fundamentally Unreliable: Madras High Court Hindu Marriage Act | Petition For Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Serves As A Valid Defence Against Allegations Of Desertion: Kerala High Court Employee Has No Vested Right To Seek Or Retain Additional Charge; Writ Petition Not Maintainable To Challenge Its Withdrawal: Madhya Pradesh High Court Insurance Act | Insurer Cannot Waive Statutory Deadline For Premium Payment Under Bank Guarantee; No Estoppel Against Statute: NCDRC Absence Of Crime Number In Inquest Report & Discrepancy In Sec 157 CrPC Special Report Renders FIR Doubtful: Allahabad High Court MTP Act  | Termination Of Pregnancy Beyond 24 Weeks Permissible If It Involves Risk To Life Or Grave Injury To Mental Health Of The Victim: Gujarat High Court Section 174A IPC | FIR Cannot Be Quashed If Process Server Reports Indicate Failure To Serve At Ordinary Residence: Delhi High Court Issues Guidelines Insolvency Petition | Transferees Of Debtor Cannot Substitute Debtor To Rebut Allegation Of Intent To Defeat Creditors Under Section 6(b) Provincial Insolvency Act: High Court Medical Negligence | Doctor Cannot Be Held Liable For Choosing One Reasonable Course Of Treatment Over Another: Bombay High Court Cruelty | Non-Registration Of FIR Cannot Be Ground To Discredit Testimony Of Wife Seeking Divorce: Jharkhand High Court No Deception At Inception: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Revive Cheating Charges Against Borrower After One-Time Settlement Consumer Protection Act | Doctrine Of 'Caveat Emptor' Subservient To 'Caveat Venditor'; Auctioneer Liable For Sale Of Encumbered Vehicle: State Commission

“Supreme Court Advocates Timely Trials, Grants Bail to Foreign National Amid Prolonged Incarceration”

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the significance of timely trials and granted bail to a foreign national, Ejike Jonas Orji, who had been under incarceration for over nine years. The Court’s order, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal on August 17, 2023, addressed the validity of the bail conditions imposed by the High Court and underscored the principles of justice and dignity.

Ejike Jonas Orji, a Nigerian citizen, had appealed against the bail conditions set by the High Court, particularly a requirement for a certificate of assurance from the High Commission of Nigeria. The appellant’s counsel argued that obtaining such a certificate posed serious challenges and was causing undue prejudice to his client. The appellant’s marriage to an Indian citizen and his family’s residence in Delhi were presented to establish his ties to India.

The Court acknowledged the appellant’s prolonged incarceration, highlighting the violation of constitutional principles of dignity and liberty. Referring to the right to speedy trial enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the Court expressed concern over the impact of extended imprisonment and emphasized the need for reasonable, fair, and just procedures.

Quoting from the judgment, the Court reflected on the urgent necessity to ensure that trials involving special laws with stringent provisions are taken up and concluded swiftly. The Court recognized the overcrowded conditions of jails and the transformation of inmates due to prolonged confinement, underscoring the importance of preventing such injustice.

The judgment held that despite not satisfying the certificate of assurance condition, the appellant could be granted bail. The Court directed the appellant’s release on bail, subject to compliance with other conditions outlined in the High Court’s order, except the certificate condition.

This decision not only serves as a precedent for granting bail with considerations for foreign nationals but also highlights the crucial importance of expeditious trial processes, ensuring justice is meted out while upholding fundamental rights.

Supreme court of India,“We are of the view that even without satisfying the condition (D), bail can be considered for the appellant who is in custody since 02.6.2014. Accordingly, subject to the bail conditions as mentioned in the High Court’s order (except the condition (D)), the appellant be released on bail as directed vide order dated 13.6.2022.”

This judgment echoes the call for timely justice and the necessity to prevent undue incarceration while upholding the principles of the law.

Date of Decision: August 17, 2023

EJIKE JONAS ORJI vs NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU    

Latest Legal News