Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

“Supreme Court Advocates Timely Trials, Grants Bail to Foreign National Amid Prolonged Incarceration”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the significance of timely trials and granted bail to a foreign national, Ejike Jonas Orji, who had been under incarceration for over nine years. The Court’s order, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal on August 17, 2023, addressed the validity of the bail conditions imposed by the High Court and underscored the principles of justice and dignity.

Ejike Jonas Orji, a Nigerian citizen, had appealed against the bail conditions set by the High Court, particularly a requirement for a certificate of assurance from the High Commission of Nigeria. The appellant’s counsel argued that obtaining such a certificate posed serious challenges and was causing undue prejudice to his client. The appellant’s marriage to an Indian citizen and his family’s residence in Delhi were presented to establish his ties to India.

The Court acknowledged the appellant’s prolonged incarceration, highlighting the violation of constitutional principles of dignity and liberty. Referring to the right to speedy trial enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the Court expressed concern over the impact of extended imprisonment and emphasized the need for reasonable, fair, and just procedures.

Quoting from the judgment, the Court reflected on the urgent necessity to ensure that trials involving special laws with stringent provisions are taken up and concluded swiftly. The Court recognized the overcrowded conditions of jails and the transformation of inmates due to prolonged confinement, underscoring the importance of preventing such injustice.

The judgment held that despite not satisfying the certificate of assurance condition, the appellant could be granted bail. The Court directed the appellant’s release on bail, subject to compliance with other conditions outlined in the High Court’s order, except the certificate condition.

This decision not only serves as a precedent for granting bail with considerations for foreign nationals but also highlights the crucial importance of expeditious trial processes, ensuring justice is meted out while upholding fundamental rights.

Supreme court of India,“We are of the view that even without satisfying the condition (D), bail can be considered for the appellant who is in custody since 02.6.2014. Accordingly, subject to the bail conditions as mentioned in the High Court’s order (except the condition (D)), the appellant be released on bail as directed vide order dated 13.6.2022.”

This judgment echoes the call for timely justice and the necessity to prevent undue incarceration while upholding the principles of the law.

Date of Decision: August 17, 2023

EJIKE JONAS ORJI vs NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU    

Latest Legal News